From Our Side Rules Are Followed
Authorizing bureaucracy in Nepal's 'permanent transition
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3628580 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sarah Byrne (0009-0002-8607-2429, University of Zurich, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 971-1000 |
| Publication date | 2018-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Modern Asian Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0026-749X • E-ISSN: 1469-8099 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0026749x1600055x |
| OpenAlex | W2809487268 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 41 |
This article explores how local civil servants produce the conditions of possibility for bureaucratic authority in Nepal's contested political environment of war and post-war 'transition'. Specifically, it examines the everyday practices of local civil servants as they attempt to influence the distribution of such public resources as agricultural inputs and local government budgets. The article asks: how do local civil servants produce the authority necessary to get things done in the face of changing local government structuresandrival authority claims frombothwartime Maoist People's Governments and resurgent patronage politics in the post-war period? In a context characterized as 'ordinary extraordinary', the article suggests that local civil servants employ a form of practice that has been termed 'tactical government' and proposes three distinct forms of this practice. However, the article also argues that tactical practice tells only part of the story and that it can be insightful to enrich our understanding of tactical government with an analysis of more general life projects. Bureaucratic practices are also motivated by factors such as the significance of the contested resource and paternal ideas of 'the common good'. Such a suggestion is in line with recent work on everyday lives in situations of protracted violent conflict and insecurity, and on the role of culture in producing civil servants/services. Looking at these two forms of practice together, in particular their interconnections, gives us a fuller account of how authority is produced. Furthermore, it allows more nuanced and detailed perspectives into the complex process of state-making
Bureaucracy · Civil servants · Context (archaeology · Geography · Government (linguistics · Local government · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Spanish Civil War · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security · Public Administration · Sociopolitical Dynamics in Nepal
Himalayan 'People's War'
Economy and Society
An Anthropological Critique of Development
Red Tape
Economy and Society
A compromising consensus? Legitimising local government in post-conflict Nepal
The state of bureaucratic representativeness and administrative culture in Nepal
The Politics of Open Defecation
Government Without Expertise? Competence, Capacity, and Civil-Service Practice in Gaza, 1917–67
War and the commons
Constructing legitimacy in post-war transition
An absent presence
Filling in the Blanks
The practice of everyday life
Sovereign Bodies
Prosaic geographies of stateness
Governing Gaza
War, Livelihoods and Vulnerability in Sri Lanka
The Absent Presence
In the Eye of the Storm
Rethinking Power and Authority
Access and Property
Ruling by Record
Critical Remarks on Weber's Theory of Authority
Government of Paper
Blurred Boundaries
The Romance of Resistance
Political Optics and the Occlusion of Intimate Knowledge
Messy bureaucracies
Markets of Protection
Everyday Government in Extraordinary Times
Resistance and the Problem of Ethnographic Refusal
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2026 (9) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |