Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in the British Parliament

Bibliographic Data

ID3765654
AuthorsJonathan B Slapin, Jonathan Slapin (0000-0002-6237-2868, University of Essex, corresponding author), Justin H Kirkland (0000-0002-5837-3606, University of Houston, corresponding author), Joseph A Lazzaro (University of Houston, corresponding author), Patrick A Leslie, Patrick Leslie (0000-0002-9218-8981, University of Essex, corresponding author), Tom O''Grady (0000-0001-5756-3216, University College London, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume112
Issue1
Pages15-30
Publication date2018-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Political Science Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0003055417000375
OpenAlexW2756371063
LanguageEN
Citations received58
References cited63

Strong party discipline is a core feature of Westminster parliamentary systems. Parties typically compel members of Parliament (MPs) to support the party regardless of MPs' individual preferences. Rebellion, however, does occur. Using an original dataset of MP votes and speeches in the British House of Commons from 1992 to 2015, coupled with new estimations of MPs' ideological positions within their party, we find evidence that MPs use rebellion strategically to differentiate themselves from their party. The strategy that MPs employ is contingent upon an interaction of ideological extremity with party control of government. Extremists are loyal when their party is in the opposition, but these same extremists become more likely to rebel when their party controls government. Additionally, they emphasize their rebellion through speeches. Existing models of rebellion and party discipline do not account for government agenda control and do not explain these patterns

Commons · Government (linguistics · House of Commons · Ideology · Opposition (politics · Parliament · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Gender Politics and Representation · Law · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Public Administration

  • Calculation and Conscience

    Open Access•Stephanie Zonszein, Apurav Yash Bhatiya et al.•British Journal of Political…•2026

  • Thinly Veiled

    Open Access•Jorge Fernandes, Jorge M Fernandes et al.•British Journal of Political…•2026

  • When Legislators Do Not Differentiate

    Open Access•Daniel Bischof, Vanessa Cheng‐matsuno et al.•British Journal of Political…•2026

  • Party Competition, Personal Votes, and Strategic Disloyalty in the U.S. States

    Open Access•Richard Burke, Justin H Kirkland et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2021

  • Parliamentary Debate and Job Market Signaling in Westminster Systems

    Open Access•Patrick Leslie, Patrick L Leslie•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2026

  • Grandstanding Instead of Deliberative Policy-Making

    Open Access•D Kostovicova, Lanabi La Lova•Journal of Intervention and…•2024

  • Assessing the parliamentary activities of UK MPs

    Open Access•Osnat Akirav•British Politics•2019

  • Braking and Exiting

    Open Access•Joseph Ganderson, Anna Kyriazi•Political Studies Review•2024

  • Unity and divisions on departmental select committees

    Open Access•Philip Lynch, Richard Whitaker•The British Journal of Politics…•2020

  • The personal touch’

    Open Access•Joshua Townsley, Siim Trumm et al.•The British Journal of Politics…•2021

  • Party theory of parliamentary debate and the endogenous nature of parliamentary institutions

    Open Access•Naoto Nonaka, Hirofumi Miwa•Party Politics•2023

  • Do Your Job, Keep Your Seat

    Open Access•Serika Atsumi•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2025

  • High emissions, low engagement? How members of parliament represent the carbon footprint of their constituents

    Open Access•Lucas Geese, Chantal Sullivan-Thomsett•European Journal of Political…•2026

  • Conflicting perceptions

    Open Access•Emma Van Der Goot, L Jacobs et al.•European Journal of Political…•2026

  • Incentives for non-participation

    Open Access•Zoltán Fazekas, Steven David Pickering•Public Choice•2022

  • Reassessing the Role and the Benefits of Junior Ministers in Coalition Governments

    Open Access•Ilana Shpaizman•Political Studies•2024

  • Chile 2021

    Open Access•Christopher A Martínez, Alejandro Olivares et al.•Revista de ciencia política•2022

  • Costly Signals

    Open Access•Markus Wagner, Nick Vivyan et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2020

  • Stance classification

    Open Access•Stephanie Ng, James Zhang et al.•Journal of Computational Social…•2025

  • Free votes and the analysis of recorded votes

    Open Access•Tamaki Ohmura, David M Willumsen•West European Politics•2023

  • When Do Politicians Grandstand? Measuring Message Politics in Committee Hearings

    Ju Yeon Park•The Journal of Politics•2021

  • Communicating the Rift

    Dominik Duell, Lea Kaftan et al.•The Journal of Politics•2023

  • With Friends like These, Who Needs Enemies

    Francesco Izzo, Federica Izzo•The Journal of Politics•2024

  • An Authenticity Expectations Gap? A Comparison of Publics’ and Members of Parliament’s Views on Politicians Being True to Themselves

    Jean Kenny, John Kenny et al.•Polity•2025

  • The Authentic A**hole

    Sofia Breitenstein, Jean Kenny et al.•Polity•2025

  • Parliamentary Representation

    Open Access•Siim Trumm, Andrew Barclay•Political Studies•2023

  • The Personalization of Electoral Rules

    Open Access•Thomas Däubler•Political Research Quarterly•2022

  • The Face of the Party

    Open Access•Vineeta Yadav, Amanda Fidalgo•Political Research Quarterly•2022

  • Ends Against the Middle

    Open Access•Jbrandon Duck-Mayr, Jacob M Montgomery•Political Analysis•2023

  • A Local Structure Graph Model

    Open Access•Olga V Chyzh, Mark S Kaiser•Political Analysis•2019

  • A General Model of Author “Style” with Application to the UK House of Commons, 1935–2018

    Open Access•Leslie Huang, Patrick O Perry et al.•Political Analysis•2020

  • The Study of Intraparty Frictions

    Open Access•Nicole Bolleyer, Ann-Kristin Kölln•Perspectives on Politics•2025

  • Citizens’ Preferences for Multidimensional Representation

    Open Access•Jack Blumenau, Fabio Wolkenstein et al.•Perspectives on Politics•2025

  • Which personality fits personalized representation

    Open Access•Troels Bøggild, Rosie Campbell et al.•Party Politics•2021

  • Whose bread I don’t eat, his song I don’t sing? MPs’ outside earnings and dissenting voting behaviour

    Open Access•Philipp Mai•Party Politics•2022

  • The partisan foundations of parliamentary speech

    Open Access•Charlotte Van Kleef, Tim A Mickler et al.•Party Politics•2024

  • Local roots and rebellion

    Open Access•Christin Reuter, Klaus Stolz•Parliamentary Affairs•2025

  • Do Members of Parliament Express More Opposition in the Plenary than in the Committee? Comparing Frontstage and Backstage Behaviour in Five National Parliaments

    Open Access•Christer Karlsson, Thomas Persson et al.•Parliamentary Affairs•2024

  • Loyal Activists? Party Socialization and Dissenting Voting Behavior in Parliament

    Open Access•Philipp Mai, Georg Wenzelburger•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2024

  • The Sound of Rebellion

    Open Access•Jonathan B Slapin, Jonathan Slapin et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2020

  • Foxes and Hedgehogs in Legislatures

    Open Access•Javier Martínez-Cantó, Christian Breunig et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2023

  • Campaigns and the Selection of Policy‐Seeking Representatives

    Open Access•Shaun Bowler, Gail Mcelroy et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2020

  • Electoral reform and fragmented polarization

    Open Access•Yen‐chieh Liao•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2025

  • Challenging the wisdom on preferential proportional representation

    Open Access•Carol Mershon•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2020

  • Back to the Westminster model? The Brexit process and the UK political system

    Open Access•Gianfranco Baldini, Edoardo Bressanelli et al.•International Political Science…•2022

  • Do all voters appreciate rebels? Ideology moderates valence benefits from factional dissent

    Johannes Besch, Alberto López Ortega et al.•Journal of Legislative Studies•2023

  • Conscientiousness of representatives and agreement with their party positions

    Open Access•Pirmin Bundi, Frédéric Varone et al.•Journal of Legislative Studies•2025

  • The politics of seeking and avoiding discourse in parliament

    Open Access•Erin Koch, Andreas Küpfer•European Journal of Political…•2025

  • The legislative cost of ruling

    Open Access•Troels Bøggild, Helene Helboe Pedersen•European Journal of Political…•2024

  • Careerists Versus Coal-Miners

    Open Access•Tom O’grady, Tom O''Grady•Comparative Political Studies•2019

  • This is what the Bolsheviks do

    Open Access•Nicholas Buhmann-Holmes•Comparative Political Studies•2025

  • The parliamentary voting behaviour of ‘teal’ independent MPs

    Open Access•Patrick Leslie•Australian Journal of Political…•2025

  • Multidimensional Representation

    Open Access•Fabio Wolkenstein, Christopher Wratil•American Journal of Political…•2021

  • Legislator Dissent Does Not Affect Electoral Outcomes

    Open Access•Patrick Cowley, Resul Umit•British Journal of Political…•2023

  • Impeaching the President

    Christopher A Martínez, Mariana Llanos et al.•Congress & the Presidency•2022

  • On-Side fighting in civil war

    Open Access•Jonah Schulhofer-Wohl•Rationality and Society•2020

  • Embedding Regression

    Open Access•Pedro L Rodríguez, Arthur Spirling et al.•American Political Science Review•2023

  • Playing to the Gallery

    Open Access•Moritz Osnabrügge, Sara B Hobolt et al.•American Political Science Review•2021

  • The Personal Vote

    Bruce E Cain, Bruce Cain et al.•Personal Vote•1987

  • The Efficient Secret

    Open Access•Gary W Cox•Efficient Secret•1987

  • Setting the Agenda

    Open Access•Gary W Cox, Mathew D Mccubbins•Setting the Agenda•2005

  • Legislative Voting and Accountability

    Open Access•John Michael Carey•Legislative voting and…•2008

  • The Politics of Parliamentary Debate

    Open Access•Sven-Oliver Proksch, Jonathan B Slapin et al.•Politics of Parliamentary Debate•2014

  • Party Discipline and Parliamentary Politics

    Open Access•Christopher Kam, Christopher J Kam•Party Discipline and Parliamentary…•2009

  • An economic theory of democracy

    Anthony Downs•An economic theory of democracy•1985

  • Veto Players

    George Tsebelis•Veto Players•2002

  • Reforming European Welfare States

    Jochen Clasen•REFORMING EUROPEAN WELFARE…•2005

  • Cameron and Liberal Conservatism

    Open Access•Timothy Heppell•The British Journal of Politics…•2012

  • Where There is Discord, Can They Bring Harmony? Managing Intra-Party Dissent on European Integration in the Conservative Party

    Open Access•Philip Lynch, Richard Whitaker•The British Journal of Politics…•2012

  • Rebels and Rebellions

    Open Access•Patrick Cowley, Philip Norton•The British Journal of Politics…•1999

  • Party, Constituency, and Representation

    Open Access•John J Baughman, John Baughman•Public Choice•2004

  • Legislative systems with absolute party discipline

    Open Access•Neil Longley•Public Choice•1998

  • The Politics of Coalition. How the Conservative–Liberal Democrat Government Works

    Open Access•G Pasquino•The Political Quarterly•2013

  • What Do Voters Want From Their Local MP

    Open Access•Nick Vivyan, Markus Wagner•The Political Quarterly•2015

  • Electoral Institutions and Legislative Behavior

    Open Access•Simon Hix•World Politics•2004

  • The Personal Vote

    Open Access•William H Flanigan•Political Science Quarterly•1988

  • Position Taking in European Parliament Speeches

    Open Access•Sven-Oliver Proksch, Jonathan B Slapin et al.•British Journal of Political…•2010

  • Europe, Thatcherism and traditionalism

    Hugh Berrington, Rod Hague•West European Politics•1998

  • No News Is News

    Open Access•Guillermo Rosas, Yael Shomer et al.•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • Desperately seeking a solution

    Martin Rhodes•West European Politics•2000

  • The Most Unkindest Cuts

    Alexander Herzog, Kenneth Benoit•The Journal of Politics•2015

  • Government-Opposition or Left-Right? The Institutional Determinants of Voting in Legislatures

    Open Access•Simon Hix, Abdul Noury•Political Science Research and…•2016

  • Who Takes the Parliamentary Floor? The Role of Gender in Speech-making in the SwedishRiksdag

    Open Access•Hanna Bäck, Marc Debus et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2014

  • The calculus of dissent

    Open Access•Barry J Gaines, Brian J Gaines et al.•Political Behavior•1993

  • Modeling Preferences Using Roll Call Votes in Parliamentary Systems

    Open Access•Thomas Bräuninger, Jochen Müller et al.•Political Analysis•2016

  • Measuring Political Positions from Legislative Speech

    Open Access•Benjamin E Lauderdale, Alexander Herzog•Political Analysis•2016

  • Legislative Behavior in Romania

    Open Access•Emanuel Emil Coman, Emanuel Coman•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2012

  • Legislative Voting Behavior, Seen and Unseen

    Open Access•Clifford J Carrubba, Clifford Carrubba et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2008

  • The Web of Authority

    Open Access•Edward Crowe, Edward W Crowe•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1986

  • British Backbench Rebellion and Government Appointments, 1945-87

    Open Access•J Richard Piper•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1991

  • Private Members' Bills in the UK Parliament

    Shaun Bowler•Journal of Legislative Studies•2010

  • Do Ideological Preferences Explain Parliamentary Behaviour? Evidence from Great Britain and Canada

    Cindy D Kam, C Kam•Journal of Legislative Studies•2001

  • Voting in the House or Wooing the Voters at Home

    Ron Johnston, P Cowley et al.•Journal of Legislative Studies•2002

  • Party unity in parliamentary democracies

    Ulrich Sieberer•Journal of Legislative Studies•2006

  • The Rights and Wrongs of Roll Calls

    Open Access•Arthur Spirling, Ian Mclean et al.•Government and Opposition•2006

  • The Demand and Supply of Parliamentary Policy Advocacy

    Open Access•Anthony M Bertelli, Rachel M Dolan et al.•Government and Opposition•2009

  • When do parties emphasise extreme positions? How strategic incentives for policy differentiation influence issue importance

    Open Access•Markus Wagner•European Journal of Political…•2012

  • Do voters reward rebellion? The electoral accountability of MPs in Britain

    Open Access•Nick Vivyan, Markus Wagner•European Journal of Political…•2012

  • The Rejected, the Ejected, and the Dejected

    Open Access•Giacomo Benedetto, Simon Hix•Comparative Political Studies•2007

  • The Making of Mavericks

    Open Access•M Tavits•Comparative Political Studies•2009

  • Party Structure and Backbench Dissent in the Canadian and British Parliaments

    Open Access•Christopher Garner, Natalia Letki•Canadian Journal of Political…•2005

  • Estimating Ideal Points in the British House of Commons Using Early Day Motions

    Open Access•Michael Kellermann•American Journal of Political…•2012

  • A Scaling Model for Estimating Time‐Series Party Positions from Texts

    Open Access•Jonathan B Slapin, Jonathan Slapin et al.•American Journal of Political…•2008

  • Institutional Foundations of Legislative Speech

    Open Access•Sven-Oliver Proksch, Sven‐oliver Proksch et al.•American Journal of Political…•2012

  • Making Policy Stick

    William B Heller•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • Competing Principals, Political Institutions, and Party Unity in Legislative Voting

    Open Access•John Michael Carey•American Journal of Political…•2007

  • Ideology, Party and Interests in the British Parliament of 1841–47

    Open Access•Cheryl Schonhardt-Bailey•British Journal of Political…•2003

  • Legislator Dissent as a Valence Signal

    Open Access•Rosie Campbell, Patrick Cowley et al.•British Journal of Political…•2019

  • The Price of Conscience

    Open Access•Charles Pattie, Edward Fieldhouse et al.•British Journal of Political…•1994

  • Selection Effects in Roll Call Votes

    Open Access•Simon Hug•British Journal of Political…•2010

  • Party Cohesion in Westminster Systems

    Open Access•Andrew C Eggers, Arthur Spirling•British Journal of Political…•2016

  • Strategic Opposition and Government Cohesion in Westminster Democracies

    Open Access•Torun Dewan, Arthur Spirling•American Political Science Review•2011

  • Cohesion in Legislatures and the Vote of Confidence Procedure

    Open Access•Daniel Diermeier, Timothy Feddersen et al.•American Political Science Review•1998

  • The Vote of Confidence in Parliamentary Democracies

    Open Access•John D Huber•American Political Science Review•1996

  • Ministerial Selection and Intraparty Organization in the Contemporary British Parliament

    Open Access•Christopher Kam, William T Bianco et al.•American Political Science Review•2010

  • Convicting the Innocent

    Open Access•Timothy Feddersen, Wolfgang Pesendorfer•American Political Science Review•1998

  • Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data

    Michael Laver, Kenneth Benoit et al.•American Political Science Review•2003

Unique citing works58
Citations per year8,29
Citation span2019 - 2026 (8)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 57

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae