Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Popular vs. elite democratic structures and international peace

Bibliographic Data

ID3915927
AuthorsDevin K Joshi (0000-0003-1531-9367, University of Denver), J S Maloy (Oklahoma State University), Timothy M Peterson (0000-0003-1159-4898, University of South Carolina, corresponding author)
Year2015
Volume52
Issue4
Pages463-477
Publication date2015-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Peace Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-3433 • E-ISSN: 1460-3578
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0022343314567722
OpenAlexW2107125643
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited52

Structural theories of international peace among democratic regimes have relied on two distinct explanatory logics: democratic institutions may cause a state's foreign policy to tend toward peace by exposing policymaking elites to pressure from ordinary citizens (the popular logic) or to pressure from other governmental agencies (the elite logic). These logics are often conflated in scholarly studies of war and peace, but we attempt to isolate the popular logic for empirical testing by developing a novel measure of institutionalized popular influence, the Institutional Democracy Index (IDI). Whereas previous usage of the Polity index to operationalize democratic structures has succeeded in testing the elite logic more than the popular logic, we use the IDI to analyze long-established democracies' involvement in international conflict between 1961 and 2001. What we find are significant differences within the family of democratic regimes that point to a monadic structural explanation of peace: more popular democracies are less warlike with respect to all other regimes, not just other democracies. By capturing variance among democratic regimes in their structures of inclusion (especially formal rules pertaining to voter access, electoral formulae, and cameral structures), the IDI enables us to observe crucial differences between the conflict propensities of more popular and more elite types of democracy

Democracy · Democratization · Economic system · Economics · Elite · Epistemology · Law and economics · Operationalization · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Polity · Positive economics · Sociology · State (computer science) · Variance (accounting) · Computer Science · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security · Political Conflict and Governance

  • International Trade, Cooperation, and Conflict

    Open Access•Timothy M Peterson, Shaoshuang Wen•Foreign Policy Analysis•2021

  • Popular versus Elite Democracies and Human Rights

    Open Access•Devin K Joshi, J S Maloy et al.•International Studies Quarterly•2019

  • Full Participation

    Sarah Birch•Full Participation•2009

  • Making Votes Count

    Open Access•Gary W Cox•Making Votes Count•1997

  • Machiavellian Democracy

    Open Access•John P Mccormick•Machiavellian Democracy•2011

  • Political Parties and Democracy

    L Diamond, Larry Jay Diamond et al.•Political Parties and Democracy•2001

  • Interaction terms in logit and probit models

    Open Access•Chunrong Ai, Edward C Norton•Economics Letters•2003

  • A Centripetal Theory of Democratic Governance

    Open Access•John Gerring, Strom C Thacker•Centripetal Theory of Democratic…•2008

  • Democracy and Development

    Open Access•Adam Przeworski, Michael E Alvarez et al.•Democracy and Development•2000

  • Democracies at War

    Dan Reiter, Allan C Stam et al.•Democracies at War•2002

  • The Logic of Democracy

    Open Access•Anthony Mcgann, Anthony J Mcgann•The Logic of Democracy•2006

  • The MID 3 data set, 1993–2001

    Douglas Lemke•Causes and consequences of…•2009

  • Patterns of democracy

    Laura Morales Diez De Ulzurrun•Choice Reviews Online•2000

  • Driving Democracy

    Open Access•P Norris•Driving Democracy•2008

  • The Logic of Political Survival

    Bruce Bueno De Mesquita, Alastair Smith et al.•The logic of political survival•2003

  • Electing to Fight

    Edward D Mansfield, Jack Snyder•Electing to fight•2005

  • Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace? Reflections on the Realist Critique of Kant's Project

    Luigi Caranti•Journal of Human Rights•2006

  • The MID3 Data Set, 1993—2001

    Open Access•Faten Ghosn, Glenn Palmer et al.•Conflict Management and Peace…•2004

  • Evaluating the Monadic Democratic Peace

    Open Access•Stephen L Quackenbush, M Rudy•Conflict Management and Peace…•2009

  • Alliance Treaty Obligations and Provisions, 1815-1944

    Brett Ashley Leeds, Brett Leeds et al.•International Interactions•2002

  • A Boom with Review

    Open Access•Michael Colaresi•American Journal of Political…•2012

  • Democracy and dictatorship revisited

    Open Access•José Antônio Cheibub, Jill Gandhi et al.•Public Choice•2010

  • Democratic Variants and Democratic Variance

    David H Clark, Timothy Nordstrom•The Journal of Politics•2005

  • Public, Legislative, and Executive Constraints on the Democratic Initiation of Conflict

    Dan Reiter, Erik R Tillman•The Journal of Politics•2002

  • Improving Tests of Theories Positing Interaction

    William D Berry, Matt Golder et al.•The Journal of Politics•2012

  • Two Persistent Dimensions of Democracy

    Michael Coppedge, Angel E Alvarez et al.•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • Establishing the rules of the game

    Sarah Birch•Representation•2005

  • Explaining Wars Fought by Established Democracies

    Open Access•David Leblang, Steve Chan•Political Research Quarterly•2003

  • Back to the Future

    Open Access•D Bruce Carter, David B Carter et al.•Political Analysis•2010

  • Understanding Interaction Models

    Open Access•Thomas Brambor, William R Clark et al.•Political Analysis•2006

  • Time to Fight

    Open Access•Michael Ireland, Michael J Ireland et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2001

  • Shared Human Rights Norms and Military Conflict

    Open Access•Timothy M Peterson, Leah Graham et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2011

  • Double Take

    Open Access•Kristian Skrede Gleditsch, Michael D Ward•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1997

  • Domestic Structure, Decisional Constraints, and War

    Open Access•T Clifton Morgan, Sally Howard Campbell•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1991

  • Tau-b or Not Tau-b

    Curtis S Signorino, Jeffrey M Ritter•International Studies Quarterly•1999

  • Democracy and Diversionary Military Intervention

    Open Access•Jeffrey Pickering, Emizet F Kisangani•International Studies Quarterly•2005

  • Survival and Accountability

    Open Access•Ryan Kennedy•International Studies Quarterly•2009

  • Explaining Rare Events in International Relations

    Open Access•Gary King, Langche Zeng•International Organization•2001

  • The protective and developmental varieties of liberal democracy

    Devin K Joshi•Democratization•2013

  • The Calculus of Consensus Democracy

    Open Access•Anthony J Mcgann, Michael Latner•Comparative Political Studies•2013

  • Gradations of Democracy? Empirical Tests of Alternative Conceptualizations

    Zachary Elkins•American Journal of Political…•2000

  • Statistical Critiques of the Democratic Peace

    Open Access•Allan Dafoe•American Journal of Political…•2011

  • Settled Borders and Regime Type

    Open Access•Douglas M Gibler, Jaroslav Tir•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • Disputes, Democracies, and Dependencies

    Open Access•Michael D Ward, Randolph M Siverson et al.•American Journal of Political…•2007

  • The Dividends of Diversion

    Open Access•Emizet F Kisangani, Jeffrey Pickering•British Journal of Political…•2009

  • Committed To Peace

    Open Access•Baukje Prins, Brandon C Prins et al.•British Journal of Political…•2008

  • Election Laws and Representative Governments

    Open Access•G Bingham Powell•British Journal of Political…•2006

  • The Social Market Roots of Democratic Peace

    M Mousseau•International Security•2009

  • Beyond the Separate Democratic Peace

    Open Access•John Macmillan, John B MacMillan•Journal of Peace Research•2003

  • Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946-1986

    Open Access•Zeev Maoz, Bruce Russett•American Political Science Review•1993

  • Assessing the Dyadic Nature of the Democratic Peace, 1918-88

    Open Access•David L Rousseau, Christopher Gelpi et al.•American Political Science Review•1996

  • An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace

    Open Access•Bruce Bueno De Mesquita, James D Morrow et al.•American Political Science Review•1999

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,29
Citation span2019 - 2021 (3)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae