Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The quantification of microwear polishes

Bibliographic Data

ID3918772
AuthorsR Grace, Roger V Grace (University of London), Ian D Graham (0000-0002-3669-1216, University of London), I D G Graham, M H Newcomer, Mark Newcomer (University of London)
Year1985
Volume17
Issue1
Pages112-120
Publication date1985-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueWorld Archaeology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0043-8243 • E-ISSN: 1470-1375
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00438243.1985.9979954
OpenAlexW1979249458
LanguageEN
Citations received60
References cited3

In the existing methodology of microwear analysis, both the descriptions and the comparisons of observed traces are highly subjective, which is unsatisfactory from many points of view. The authors describe various image processing techniques and discuss their potential to alleviate this situation by providing a means of quantifying microwear polishes and hence of comparing them objectively. Promising results have been obtained, although some technical difficulties remain. Applications of the technique to experimentally used flint implements enabled various useful observations to be made, including the unexpectedly large degree of overlap between the polishes produced by different contact materials; the implications of these results are briefly discussed. Research is continuing

Degree (music · Artificial Intelligence · Body Composition Measurement Techniques · Computer Science · Forensic and Genetic Research · Infrared Thermography in Medicine

  • Surface analysis of stone and bone tools

    W J Stemp, Adam S Watson et al.•Surface Topography: Metrology and…•2015

  • Quantifying Microwear on Experimental Mistassini Quartzite Scrapers

    Open Access•W J Stemp, Harry J Lerner et al.•Scanning•2013

  • Kárpát-medencei nyersanyagokból készült kőeszközök felületi elváltozásainak kvalitatív és kvantitatív elemzése

    Open Access•Antony Borel, Raphaël Deltombe et al.•Magyar Régészet•2021

  • Macro and Micro Evidences from the Past

    Open Access•João Marreiros, Niccolò Mazzucco et al.•Use-Wear and Residue Analysis in…•2015

  • Intra-raw material variability and use-wear accrual

    Open Access•Harry J Lerner•Journal of Lithic Studies•2014

  • Estudios funcionales de artefactos líticos de Cueva de las Manos, Río Pinturas, Santa Cruz, Argentina

    Open Access•G Roxana Cattáneo, Gianmario Cattaneo et al.•Revista del Museo de Antropología•2009

  • The ArchaeObia concept applied to data curation for the Acheulean site of Cagny-l’Épinette (Somme Valley, France)

    Open Access•Floriane Peudon, Éric Masson•Paléo•2026

  • Quantitative methods in archaeology

    Open Access•M Aldenderfer•Journal of Archaeological Research•1998

  • Microscopic analysis of technical and functional traces as a method for the use-wear analysis of rock crystal tools

    Open Access•Juan Luis Fernández-Marchena, Andreu Ollé•Quaternary International•2016

  • Monitoring and interpreting the use-wear formation processes on quartzite flakes through sequential experiments

    Open Access•Antonella Pedergnana, Andreu Ollé•Quaternary International•2017

  • Functional analysis of prehistoric flint tools by high-power microscopy

    Open Access•Helle Juel Jensen•Journal of World Prehistory•1988

  • A review of “Investigating microwear polishes with blind tests”

    Open Access•Emily H Moss•Journal of Archaeological Science•1987

  • A review of quantification of lithic use-wear using laser profilometry

    Open Access•W J Stemp•Journal of Archaeological Science•2014

  • Butchering or wood? A LSCM analysis to distinguish use-wear on stone tools

    Open Access•A Álvarez-Fernández, Rebeca García González et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2020

  • A new combined approach using confocal and scanning electron microscopy to image surface modifications on quartzite

    Open Access•A Pedergnana, Andreu Ollé et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2020

  • New perspectives for recognizing use wear from cereals

    Open Access•Davide D’Errico•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2017

  • Testing imaging confocal microscopy, laser scanning confocal microscopy, and focus variation microscopy for microscale measurement of edge cross-sections and calculation of edge curvature on stone tools

    Open Access•W J Stemp, D A Macdonald et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2019

  • Is Loading a Significantly Influential Factor in the Development of Lithic Microwear? An Experimental Test Using LSCM on Basalt from Olduvai Gorge

    Open Access•A Key, Alastair J M Key et al.•Journal of Archaeological Method…•2014

  • Quantitative Methods in Archaeology

    Open Access•M Aldenderfer•Journal of Archaeological Research•1998

  • Microwear methodology

    Open Access•M H Newcomer, Mark Newcomer et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•1988

  • UBM Laser Profilometry and Lithic Use-Wear Analysis

    Open Access•W J Stemp, Michael Stemp•Journal of Archaeological Science•2001

  • Documenting Stages of Polish Development on Experimental Stone Tools

    Open Access•W J Stemp, Michael Stemp•Journal of Archaeological Science•2003

  • On the importance of blind testing in archaeological science

    Open Access•Adrian Evans, Adrian Anthony Evans•Journal of Archaeological Science•2013

  • Investigating microwear polishes with blind tests

    Open Access•D B Bamforth•Journal of Archaeological Science•1988

  • Verifying the reliability of blood residue analysis on archaeological tools

    Open Access•Brian Kooyman, Margaret E Newman et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•1992

  • Investigating microwear polishes with blind tests

    Open Access•Mark Newcomer, R Grace et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•1986

  • Ambiguous use traces and blind test results

    Open Access•D B Bamforth, George R Burns et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•1990

  • Lithic raw material physical properties and use-wear accrual

    Open Access•Harry J Lerner, Harry Lerner et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2006

  • The application of focus variation microscopy for lithic use-wear quantification

    Open Access•D A Macdonald•Journal of Archaeological Science•2013

  • Sickle blade life-history and the transition to agriculture

    Open Access•Nathan Goodale, Heather Otis et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2009

  • Tracing sickle blade levels of wear and discard patterns

    Open Access•Jacob Vardi, Amir Golan et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2010

  • Why should traceology learn from dental microwear, and vice-versa

    Open Access•Ivan Calandra, A Pedergnana et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2019

  • An investigation of the fractal properties of flint microwear images

    Open Access•D Rees, G G Wilkinson et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•1991

  • Reaping the rewards

    Open Access•W J Stemp, Adrian Evans et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2011

  • Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses of Surface Alterations of Stone Tools Made of Raw Materials from the Carpathian Basin

    Open Access•Antony Borel, Raphaël Deltombe et al.•Hungarian Archaeology•2021

  • Scales of Analysis

    Open Access•Justin Bradfield•Arheologia•2022

  • Applied Force as a Determining Factor in Lithic Use-Wear Accrual

    A Key, Alastair J M Key•Lithic Technology•2013

  • Stone Tool Caching on the North American Plains

    Marcel Kornfeld, Kaoru Akoshima et al.•Journal of Field Archaeology•1990

  • Recent developments in the analysis of lithic artifacts

    Open Access•Richard W Yerkes, P Nick Kardulias•Journal of Archaeological Research•1993

  • A citation network analysis of lithic microwear research

    Open Access•Christopher J Dunmore, Ben Pateman et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2018

  • Barely scratched the surface

    Open Access•R Fuentes, Alfred Pawlik•Archaeological Research in Asia•2022

  • Through Time

    Open Access•G L F Berruti, Diego E Angelucci et al.•Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology•2024

  • Quantifying lithic surface alterations using confocal microscopy and its relevance for exploring the Châtelperronian at La Roche-à-Pierrot (Saint-Césaire, France)

    Open Access•Aline Galland, Alain Queffelec et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2019

  • Rethinking Use-Wear Analysis and Experimentation as Applied to the Study of Past Hominin Tool Use

    Open Access•João Marreiros, Ivan Calandra et al.•Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology•2020

  • Long-term trends in Natufian subsistence

    Open Access•Laure Dubreuil•Journal of Archaeological Science•2004

  • Quantification and Discrimination of Lithic Use‐wear

    Open Access•W J Stemp, Benjamin E Childs et al.•Archaeometry•2009

  • Quantifying 3D Micro‐Surface Changes on Experimental Stones Used to Break Bones and Their Implications for the Analysis of Early Stone Age Pounding Tools

    Open Access•Alfonso Benito-Calvo, Adrián Arroyo et al.•Archaeometry•2018

  • The quantification of surface abrasion on flint stone tools

    Open Access•Guillermo Bustos‐Pérez, Andreu Ollé•Archaeometry•2024

  • Testing Area‐Scale Fractal Complexity (A sfc ) and Laser Scanning Confocal Microscopy (LSCM) to Document and Discriminate Microwear on Experimental Quartzite Scrapers

    Open Access•W J Stemp, Harry J Lerner et al.•Archaeometry•2018

  • Shining Light on Dark Matter

    Open Access•Fiona Pichon, Juan José Ibáñez et al.•Journal of Archaeological Method…•2025

  • Archaeological and Experimental Lithic Microwear Classification Through 2D Textural Analysis and Machine Learning

    Open Access•Paolo Sferrazza•Journal of Archaeological Method…•2025

  • Early humans and the sea in Europe

    Open Access•Trishia Gayle R Palconit, Daniele Aureli et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2025

  • Diagnostic impact fractures and micro-wear analysis

    Open Access•A Jörgensen-Lindahl, T Richter•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2026

  • The Late Neolithic chipped stone industry from the new excavations at Domuztepe

    Open Access•Nilay Çetin Demir•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2026

  • A method for the taphonomic assessment of bone tools using 3D surface texture analysis of bone microtopography

    Open Access•Naomi L Martisius, Shannon J P Mcpherron et al.•Archaeological and Anthropological…•2020

  • Micro-abrasion of flint artifacts by mobile sediments

    Open Access•Wei Chu, Charlie Thompson et al.•Archaeological and Anthropological…•2015

  • Quantifying use-wear traces through Rimaps and Variogram analyses

    Open Access•Myrian R Álvarez, Myrian Álvarez et al.•Archaeological and Anthropological…•2012

  • The Quantification of Microwear on Chipped Stone Tools

    W J Stemp, Ben E Childs et al.•Lithic Technology•2008

  • On Accuracy and Revelance in Lithic Use-wear Analysis

    John J Shea•Lithic Technology•1987

  • Digital Image Analysis and Use-Wear Accrual as a Function of Raw Material

    Harry J Lerner•Lithic Technology•2007

  • The Functional Analysis of Flint Implements: Pincevent and Pont d'Ambon : two case studies from the French Final Palaeolithic

    Emily H Moss•The functional analysis of flint…•1983

  • Experimental determination of stone tool uses

    Lawrence H Keeley•Experimental determination of…•1980

  • Microwear analysis of experimental flint tools

    Open Access•Lawrence H Keeley, M H Newcomer et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•1977

Unique citing works60
Citations per year1,5
Citation span1986 - 2026 (41)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 60

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae