Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Identifying disrespect and abuse in organisational culture

A study of two hospitals in Mumbai, India

Bibliographic Data

ID3972680
AuthorsNeha Madhiwalla (0000-0002-0922-7186, Anusandhan Trust, corresponding author), Rakhi Ghoshal (0000-0001-9854-4425, Anusandhan Trust), Padmaja Mavani (0000-0003-2869-2988, Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Seth G.S. Medical College and K.E.M. Hospital, Mumbai, India), Nobhojit Roy (0000-0003-2022-7416, Head, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research on Surgical Care Delivery in LMICS, Surgical Unit, BARC Hospital, Mumbai, India)
Year2018
Volume26
Issue53
Pages36-47
Publication date2018-08-27
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueReproductive Health Matters (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0968-8080 • E-ISSN: 1460-9576
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09688080.2018.1502021
PMID30102132
OpenAlexW2886042740
LanguageEN
Citations received13
References cited19

This paper draws on findings from a qualitative study of two government hospitals in Mumbai, India, which aimed to provide a better understanding of the institutional drivers of disrespect and abuse (D&A) in childbirth. The paper describes the structural context, in which government hospital providers can exercise considerable power over patients, yet may be themselves vulnerable to violence and external influence. Decisions that affect care are made by a bureaucracy, which does not perceive problems with the same intensity as providers who are directly attending to patients. Within this context, while contrasting organisational cultures had evolved at the two hospitals, both were characterised by social/professional inequality and hierarchical functioning, and marginalising women. This context generates invisible pressures on subordinate staff, and creates interpersonal conflicts and ambiguity in the division of roles and responsibilities that manifest in individual actions of D&A. Services are organised around the internal logic of the institution, rather than being centred on women. This results in conditions that violate women's privacy, and disregards their choice and consent. The structural environment of resource constraints, poor management and bureaucratic decision-making leads to precarious situations, endangering women's safety. With the institution's functioning based on hierarchies and authority, rather than adherence to universal standards or established protocols, irrational, harmful practices endorsed by senior staff are institutionalised and reproduced. A deeper focus on organisational culture, embedded in the discourse of D&A, would help to evolve effective strategies to address D&A as systemic problems

Bureaucracy · Focus group · Institution · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Global Maternal and Child Health · Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health · Law · Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions · Medicine · Nursing

  • Evidence of ‘obstetric violence’ in India

    Open Access•Surbhi Shrivastava, M Sivakami•Journal of Biosocial Science•2020

  • Learning from obstetric violence in UK births at home

    Gemma Mckenzie•Journal of Gender-Based Violence•2024

  • Addressing obstetric violence

    Open Access•Abena Asefuaba Yalley, Gabija Jarašiūnaitė-Fedosejeva et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2024

  • A narrative review of challenges related to healthcare worker rights, roles and responsibilities in the provision of sexual and reproductive services in health facilities

    Open Access•Marta Schaaf, Antonella Lavelanet et al.•BMJ Global Health•2023

  • What factors are associated with forms of mistreatment during facility-based childbirth? A survey of referral health facilities in south-east Nigeria

    Open Access•Ijeoma Nkem Okedo‐Alex, Ifeyinwa Chizoba Akamike et al.•Journal of Biosocial Science•2022

  • Phenomenology of humiliation

    Shreya Subramani•Medical Humanities•2025

  • Surrogate decision-making’ in India for women competent to consent and choose during childbirth

    Open Access•Kaveri Mayra, Zoë Matthews et al.•Agenda•2021

  • ‘They did not care for me. I was alone on bed like a dead person’

    Open Access•Rejina Gurung, Sibylle Herzig Van Wee•Global Public Health•2024

  • A scoping review of the impact of organisational factors on providers and related interventions in LMICs

    Open Access•Bhavya Reddy, Sophia Thomas et al.•PLOS Global Public Health•2022

  • A critical interpretive synthesis of power and mistreatment of women in maternity care

    Open Access•Marta Schaaf, Maayan Jaffe et al.•PLOS Global Public Health•2023

  • The development of proxy indicators to measure workforce well-being in emergency obstetric and neonatal care settings

    Open Access•R Rima Jolivet, Erica Munson et al.•Journal of Global Health•2025

  • Systems on the edge

    Open Access•Kate Ramsey•Health Policy and Planning•2022

  • Yo trato de no llorar

    Allison R Cantor•Medical Anthropology•2023

  • ‘Maybe It Was Her Fate and Maybe She Ran Out of Blood’

    Open Access•Lucia D’ambruoso, Lucia D'Ambruoso et al.•Journal of Biosocial Science•2010

  • Birth on the Threshold

    Cecilia Van Hollen•Birth on the Threshold•2003

  • Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon

    Open Access•Suellen Miller, Edgardo Abalos et al.•The Lancet•2016

  • Defining disrespect and abuse of women in childbirth

    Open Access•Lynn P Freedman, Kate Ramsey et al.•Bulletin of the World Health…•2014

  • The Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth in Health Facilities Globally

    Open Access•Meghan A Bohren, Joshua P Vogel et al.•PLoS Medicine•2015

  • Attitudes and behaviours of maternal health care providers in interactions with clients

    Open Access•P Mannava, K Durrant et al.•Globalization and Health•2015

  • Mozambican Midwives' Views on Barriers to Quality Perinatal Care

    Karen Odberg Pettersson, Ella Johansson et al.•Health Care For Women International•2006

  • Disrespectful intrapartum care during facility-based delivery in sub-Saharan Africa

    Open Access•Susan Bradley, Christine Mccourt et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2016

  • Medical management and giving birth

    Kalpana Ram•Reproductive Health Matters•1994

  • Medical professional dominance and client dissatisfaction

    Open Access•Daphne Phillips•Social Science & Medicine•1996

  • The Cut Above" and "the Cut Below

    Simone Grilo Diniz, Alessandra Sampaio Chacham•Reproductive Health Matters•2004

  • Why do nurses abuse patients? Reflections from South African obstetric services

    Open Access•Rachel Jewkes, Naeema Abrahams et al.•Social Science & Medicine•1998

  • Moving targets

    Cecilia Van Hollen•Reproductive Health Matters•1998

  • Invoking Vali

    Open Access•Cecilia Van Hollen•Medical Anthropology Quarterly•2003

  • Managing Labor and Delivery among Impoverished Populations in Mexico

    Open Access•Vania Smith-Oka, Vania Smith‐oka•American Anthropologist•2013

Unique citing works13
Citations per year2,17
Citation span2020 - 2025 (6)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 11

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae