Creating Knowledge Assets under Biocapitalism

Analyzing China's Biomedical Industry and Its Patent Networks

Bibliographic Data

ID4042626
AuthorsYu Zhou (0009-0001-5712-6902, Vassar College, corresponding author), Feixiang Sun (Capital Normal University)
Year2022
Volume98
Issue5
Pages411-437
Publication date2022-10-20
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueEconomic Geography (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0013-0095 • E-ISSN: 1944-8287
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00130095.2022.2070471
OpenAlexW4283777750
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited60

Breakthroughs in biotechnology, globalizing intellectual property rights legislations, and growing venture capital in the past thirty years have given rise to new forms of capitalist accumulation that scholars called biocapitalism. Bioscientific knowledge under biocapitalism is increasingly parceled out from a global common to private enclosures for biotech and pharmaceutical companies, contributing to vast inequalities and fractures of global access to innovation evident in the COVID-19 pandemic. The assetization and financialization of knowledge have shifted the ground of innovation from competitive commodity production and exchanges to generating, managing, and commercializing patents and associated monopoly rights, thus raising the challenges of innovation for those developing countries specialized in production. Many Asian countries have invested heavily in biomedical sciences to enhance their knowledge assets but had limited success in translating the scientific development to a globally significant biomedical industry. This article discusses the evolution of China’s biomedical industry from a technological laggard to a recent innovation boom after a regulatory overhaul in 2015. Analyzing the patent collaborative networks of China’s biomedical industry since 2003, we found the central roles of domestic public research institutions, in contrast to multinational corporations, as cutting-edge knowledge providers. We argue that China’s path of the biomedical industry is distinct from its other technology industries that rely on multinational corporations for core knowledge. It represents a national articulation in response to global biocapitalism by situating the domestic research institutions and biomedical firms at the center of knowledge assets production and engaging globally in the science and drug regulatory systems

Boom · Business · China · Economics · Futures studies · Industrial organization · Intellectual property · International trade · Market economy · Monopoly · Multinational corporation · Political science · Biotechnology and Related Fields · Finance · Innovation and Socioeconomic Development · Innovation Policy and RD

Tools

Open DOI