Make it loud and simple
Coalition politics and problem framing in the French policy process of hydraulic fracturing
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4074458 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stéphane Moyson (0000-0002-6564-2309, UCLouvain, corresponding author), Bastien Fievet (UCLouvain, corresponding author), Maximilien Plancq (UCLouvain, corresponding author), Sébastien Chailleux (0000-0003-4664-3741, Sciences Po Bordeaux, corresponding author), David Aubin (0000-0002-5903-3283, UCLouvain, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 411-440 |
| Publication date | 2022-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Review of Policy Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1541-132X • E-ISSN: 1541-1338 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/ropr.12473 |
| OpenAlex | W4214576900 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 49 |
Based on a case study and media content analysis, we rely on insights from the advocacy coalition framework and from the narrative policy framework to conduct a congruence analysis of the French politics of hydraulic fracturing (2010-2017). Despite the lobbying of a resourceful coalition of pro-fracturing policy actors and their strategy of active participation in various professional forums, hydraulic fracturing was partially banned in 2011 and completely prohibited in 2017. Our results relate this ban to the stronger repetition of a simpler framing of the policy problem by the members of the anti-fracturing coalition. In other words, coalition members willing to transform their policy beliefs into concrete decisions should frame them into loud and simple policy narratives. These findings call for further articulation between the narrative policy framework and the advocacy coalition framework to account for narratives as the essence of strategies that advocacy coalitions develop for influencing policy processes
Civil engineering · Framing (construction · Geotechnical engineering · Hydraulic fracturing · Linguistics · Narrative · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Sociology · Engineering · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Law · Policy Transfer and Learning · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Theories of the Policy Process
The Advocacy Coalition Framework
Discourse Coalitions and the Institutionalization of Practice
Effects of News Coverage on Policy Attention and Actions
Policy change and learning
La fronde contre le gaz de schiste
Designing Case Studies
Unconventional gas development in Australia
Yet more ‘fracking’ social science
Unconventional oil and gas in France
Public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing (Fracking) in Canada
Strategic ignorance and politics of time
A Narrative Policy Framework Analysis of Wildfire Policy Discussions in Two Colorado Communities
Narrative Policy Framework
Cognition and policy change
A Comparative View of Advocacy Coalitions
Knowledge, Policy-Oriented Learning, and Policy Change
Reconsidering Policy Feedback
Policy forums
Themes and Variations
The advocacy coalition framework
The Politics of Crisis Policymaking
When Effect Becomes Cause
The Intersection of Narrative Policy Analysis and Policy Change Theory
Policy Narratives and Policy Processes
An Angel on the Wind
A Narrative Policy Framework
Shifting Resources and Venues Producing Policy Change in Contested Subsystems
Short‐Term Versus Long‐Term Coalitions in the Policy Process
Standing on the Shoulders of Giants
Varieties of Policy Feedback Research
Framing and advocacy
Forum Section
Framing by the Flock
Journalists, Cognition, and the Presentation of an Epidemiologic Study
Mechanisms in Political Processes
Framing
Heuristic Decision Making
Framing Contests and Policy Conflicts over Gas Pipelines
Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2025 (5) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |