Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Kant and Overdemandingness I

The Demandingness of Imperfect Duties

Bibliographic Data

ID4079931
AuthorsJessica Saunders (0000-0003-1290-275X, Durham University), Joe Saunders, Joe Slater (0000-0003-2269-7235, University of Glasgow, corresponding author), Martin Sticker (0000-0003-4895-4359, University of Bristol)
Year2024
Volume19
Issue6
Publication date2024-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhilosophy Compass (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1747-9991 • E-ISSN: 1747-9991
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/phc3.12998
OpenAlexW4399458212
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited53

The Overdemandingness Objection maintains that an ethical theory or principle that demands too much should be rejected, or at least moderated. Traditionally, overdemandingness is considered primarily a problem for consequentialist ethical theories. Recently, Kant and Kantian ethics have also become part of the debate. This development helps us better understand both overdemandingness and problems with Kant's ethics. In this, the first of a pair of papers, we introduce the distinction between perfect and imperfect duties as well as a framework for understanding the overdemandingness objection that allows us to discuss overdemandingness across different ethical theories. We then consider two ways that Kantians have sought to avoid the implication that imperfect duties may be overly demanding: (1) via the latitude of imperfect duties, and (2) by the suggestion that the wider system of duties is self-moderating. We conclude that it is unclear whether the two most prominent ways of addressing the overdemandingness objection work, challenging them on their own terms, and observing that they are inapplicable to potential demandingness concerns pertaining to perfect duties

Imperfect · Linguistics · Free Will and Agency · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics

  • Reading and misreading Kant in relation to virtual taboos

    Open Access•Andrew Kimbrough•Ethics and Information Technology•2026

  • The Normativity of Rationality

    Open Access•Lisa Bastian•The Journal of Value Inquiry•2025

  • Kant and Overdemandingness II

    Open Access•Jessica Saunders, Joe Saunders et al.•Philosophy Compass•2025

  • Acting on Principle

    Onora Nell•Acting on Principle•1975

  • Living High and Letting Die

    Peter Unger, Peter K Unger•Living high and letting die•1996

  • Duties to Others

    Katja Maria Vogt•Kant's Ethics of Virtue•2008

  • Making Room for Options

    Open Access•Patricia Greenspan•Social Philosophy and Policy•2010

  • The Moral Habitat

    Barbara Herman•Moral Habitat•2021

  • Mutual Aid and Respect for Persons

    Barbara Herman•Ethics•1984

  • Towards Justice and Virtue

    Open Access•Onora O’neill, Onora O'Neill•Towards Justice and Virtue•1996

  • Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality (1984)

    Open Access•Peter Railton•Facts, Values, and Norms•2003

  • Famine, Affluence and Morality

    Peter Singer•Global Justice•2020

  • Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality

    Peter Railton, Neera Kapur Badhwar•Friendship•1993

  • Moral Saints

    Susan Wolf, Susan M Wolf•The Journal of Philosophy•1982

  • If You're an Egalitarian, How Come You're so Rich

    Open Access•G A Cohen•The Journal of Ethics•2000

  • Moral Luck

    Open Access•Bernard Williams•Moral Luck•1981

  • Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy

    Bernard Williams, Adrian Moore•Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy•2006

  • Satisficers Still Get Away with Murder

    Open Access•Joe Slater•Ergo an Open Access Journal of…•2024

  • Why we go wrong

    Open Access•Martin Sticker, Jessica Saunders•Inquiry•2025

  • Cost and Psychological Difficulty

    Open Access•Brian Mcelwee•Australasian Journal of Philosophy•2023

  • Autonomy, Progress and Virtue

    Open Access•Jens Timmermann•Kantian Review•2018

  • Perfect and Imperfect Duty

    Open Access•Simon Hope•Kantian Review•2023

  • Moral Rationalism and Demandingness in Kant

    Open Access•Marcel Van Ackeren, Martin Sticker•Kantian Review•2018

  • On Virtues of Love and Wide Ethical Duties

    Open Access•Melissa Seymour Fahmy•Kantian Review•2019

  • Utilitarianism

    Bernard Williams, J J C Smart•Utilitarianism•2013

  • K antian Imperfect Duties and Modern Debates over Human Rights

    Open Access•Simon Hope•Journal of Political Philosophy•2013

  • Satisficing Consequentialism Still Doesn't Satisfy

    Open Access•Joe Slater•Utilitas•2019

  • Defending Limits on the Sacrifices We Ought To Make For Others

    Open Access•Violetta Igneski•Utilitas•2008

  • Kantian Consequentialism

    David Cummiskey•Kantian consequentialism•1996

  • Kant and the demandingness of the virtue of beneficence

    Open Access•Paul Formosa, Martin Sticker•European Journal of Philosophy•2019

  • Kant's Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals a commentary

    Jens Timmermann•Kant's Groundwork of the…•2007

  • The Demandingness of Scanlon’s Contractualism

    Elizabeth Ashford•Ethics•2003

  • Kant's Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals

    Henry E Allison•Kant's Groundwork for the…•2011

  • Human Welfare and Moral Worth

    Thomas E Hill, Jr Thomas E Hill•Human welfare and moral worth•2002

  • Demandingness Objections in Ethics

    Brian Mcelwee•The Philosophical Quarterly•2017

Unique citing works3
Citations per year3
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae