Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Morality of Belief II

Three Challenges and An Extension

Bibliographic Data

ID4079971
AuthorsRima Basu (0000-0001-8083-5996, Claremont McKenna College, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume18
Issue7
Publication date2023-07-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhilosophy Compass (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1747-9991 • E-ISSN: 1747-9991
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/phc3.12935
OpenAlexW4380486643
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited35

In this paper I explore three challenges to the morality of belief. First, whether we have the necessary control over our beliefs to be held responsible for them, i.e., the challenge of doxastic involuntarism. Second, the question of whether belief is really the attitude that we care about in the cases used to motivate the morality of belief. Third, whether attitudes weaker than belief, such as credence, can wrong, I then end by turning to how answers to the previous challenges suggest a way of extending the morality of belief to encompass a way of thinking of the moral mind more generally

Credence · Doxastic logic · Epistemology · Extension (predicate logic · Morality · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology

  • The Architecture of Blame and Praise

    David Shoemaker•The Architecture of Blame and…•2024

  • A defense of back‐end doxastic voluntarism

    Open Access•Laura K Soter•Noûs•2025

  • The Constitutive Inheritance Account of the Ethical Significance of Belief

    Z Quanbeck•Ethics•2025

  • Toward an Ethics of AI Belief

    Open Access•Winnie Ma, Vincent Valton•Philosophy & Technology•2024

  • Reframing Epistemic Partiality

    Open Access•Laura K Soter•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2025

  • Slurring silences

    Open Access•A G Holdier•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2024

  • Playing with labels

    Open Access•Elisabeth Camp, Carolina Flores•The Philosophical Quarterly•2024

  • Probabilistic Knowledge

    Sarah Mo, Sarah Moss•Probabilistic Knowledge•2018

  • Belief, credence, and norms

    Open Access•Lara Buchak•Philosophical Studies•2014

  • The wrongs of racist beliefs

    Open Access•Rima Basu•Philosophical Studies•2019

  • IX—Moral Encroachment

    Open Access•Sarah Mo, Sarah Moss•Proceedings of the Aristotelian…•2018

  • What we epistemically owe to each other

    Open Access•Rima Basu•Philosophical Studies•2019

  • Responsibility for Attitudes

    Angela M Smith•Ethics•2005

  • Radical moral encroachment

    Open Access•Rima Basu•Philosophical Issues•2019

  • What Use Are Real-World Cases for Philosophers

    Open Access•Katherine Furman•Ergo an Open Access Journal of…•2021

  • Morality justifies motivated reasoning in the folk ethics of belief

    Open Access•Corey Cusimano, Tania Lombrozo•Cognition•2021

  • People recognize and condone their own morally motivated reasoning

    Open Access•Corey Cusimano, Tania Lombrozo•Cognition•2023

  • On the epistemic costs of implicit bias

    Open Access•Tamar Szabó Gendler•Philosophical Studies•2011

  • Varieties of Moral Encroachment

    Open Access•Renée Jorgensen Bolinger•Philosophical Perspectives•2020

  • Belief, credence, and moral encroachment

    Open Access•James Fritz, Elizabeth G Jackson•Synthese•2021

  • Don’t forget forgetting

    Open Access•Daniel J Singer, Aaron Bramson et al.•Synthese•2021

  • Involuntary Sins

    Robert Merrihew Adams•The Philosophical Review•1985

Citations per year3.5
Citation span2024 - 2025 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae