Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Early career training and development of academic independence

A case of life sciences in Japan

Bibliographic Data

ID4097265
AuthorsTohru Yoshioka-Kobayashi (0000-0003-4393-3989, Hitotsubashi University), Sotaro Shibayama (0000-0002-6701-9828, Lund University, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume46
Issue12
Pages2751-2773
Publication date2021-12-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueStudies in Higher Education (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0307-5079 • E-ISSN: 1470-174X
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/03075079.2020.1817889
OpenAlexW3085989739
LanguageEN
Citations received14
References cited70

Academic training is the initial step for junior scientists to learn to develop into independent scientists. This study investigates how supervisors decide to employ different approaches of early-career research training, and how these approaches influence the degree of trainees’ independence in their later careers. Drawing on survey and bibliometric data of life scientists in Japanese universities, this study presents the following findings. First, if scientists are allowed higher autonomy in upstream research functions in early-career training, they later tend to attain greater organizational independence with higher organizational ranks. Second, if scientists are encouraged to deviate from conventional research topics during early-career training, they later tend to achieve greater cognitive independence by producing original research output. Third, the differences in the training approaches chosen by individual supervisors are influenced by the training that they had received in their early-career training. Overall, the study suggests that training approaches and independence of scientists are socialized in the local training context and passed down from one generation to the next

Career development · Higher education · Mathematics education · Medical education · Pedagogy · Political science · Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions · Health and Medical Research Impacts · Medicine · Psychology · scientometrics and bibliometrics research

  • Development and Validation of the Japanese Version of the Revised Publication Pressure Questionnaire ( PPQr ‐J)

    Open Access•Kyosuke Nozawa, Kotaro Imamura et al.•Japanese Psychological Research•2026

  • How researchers across career stages experience researcher independence

    Open Access•Y Sakurai, Yu Jin et al.•Innovations in Education and…•2026

  • Female university academics' reflections on the development of their academic careers in the Norwegian higher education context

    Open Access•ZADA PAJALIC, Diana Saplacan Lindblom et al.•Social Sciences & Humanities Open•2023

  • The influencing mechanism of research training on Chinese STEM Ph.D. students’ career interests

    Open Access•Xiang Zheng, Wenhui Zhou et al.•Asia Pacific Education Review•2022

  • Occupational choice, satisfaction and success of PhD graduates in East Asia and the West

    Open Access•Yu Yang, T Fumasoli•Higher Education Quarterly•2024

  • Development of originality under inbreeding

    Open Access•Sotaro Shibayama•Higher Education Quarterly•2022

  • Exploring the determinants of research performance for early-career researchers

    Open Access•Danielle Lee•Scientometrics•2024

  • Determinants of Ph.D. progression

    Open Access•Tohru Yoshioka-Kobayashi, Sotaro Shibayama•Higher Education•2023

  • Group supervision in Chinese STEM laboratories

    Open Access•Jiayu Wang, Wenqin Shen et al.•Higher Education•2025

  • How doctoral supervisor–student co-authorship shapes future scientific productivity, collaboration, quality and independence

    Open Access•Songyue Lin, Jin Liu et al.•Higher Education•2026

  • Internationalizing Doctoral Education

    Open Access•Lechen Li, Rachel Dean Divaker et al.•Minerva•2025

  • Organizational location and propensity for coauthorship in sociology

    Joseph C Hermanowicz, Man-Kit Lei•Studies in Higher Education•2023

  • Shaping scientific careers

    Pauline Mattsson, Sotaro Shibayama•Studies in Higher Education•2025

  • Research independence

    Open Access•Sofia Patsali, Michele Pezzoni et al.•Studies in Higher Education•2024

  • How Economics Shapes Science

    Paula E Stephan, Paula Stephan•How Economics Shapes Science•2012

  • Does adviser mentoring add value? A longitudinal study of mentoring and doctoral student outcomes

    Open Access•Laura L Paglis, Stephen G Green et al.•Research in Higher Education•2006

  • Incentives and creativity

    Open Access•Pierre Azoulay, Joshua Graff Zivin et al.•The RAND Journal of Economics•2011

  • “I Heard it through the Grapevine”

    Open Access•Sheena K Gardner, Susan K Gardner•Higher Education•2007

  • Does Interdisciplinary Research Lead to Higher Citation Impact? The Different Effect of Proximal and Distal Interdisciplinarity

    Open Access•Alfredo Yegros, Alfredo Yegros-Yegros et al.•PLoS ONE•2015

  • The associative basis of the creative process.

    Sarnoff A Mednick, SARNOFF MEDNICK•Psychological Review•1962

  • Scientists’ collaboration strategies

    Open Access•Barry Bozeman, Elizabeth A Corley et al.•Research Policy•2004

  • From apprentice to colleague

    Open Access•Grit Laudel, Jochen Gläser•Higher Education•2008

  • Bias against novelty in science

    Open Access•Jian Wang, Reinhilde Veugelers et al.•Research Policy•2017

  • Organizational and institutional influences on creativity in scientific research

    Open Access•Thomas Heinze, Philip Shapira et al.•Research Policy•2009

  • Education

    Open Access•David Cyranoski, Natasha Gilbert et al.•Nature•2011

  • Mentoring in Academic Medicine

    Dario Sambunjak, Sharon E Straus et al.•JAMA•2006

  • The Role of the Department and Discipline in Doctoral Student Attrition

    Chris M Golde•The Journal of Higher Education•2005

  • Mentoring Relationships in Graduate School

    Open Access•Harriet R Tenenbaum, Harriet Tenenbaum et al.•Journal of Vocational Behavior•2001

  • Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier

    Open Access•Kevin J Boudreau, Kevin Boudreau et al.•Management Science•2016

  • The concept of ‘originality’ in the Ph.D

    Gillian Clarke, Ingrid Lunt•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2014

  • The Essential Tension

    Thomas S Kuhn, Thomas Kühn•The Essential Tension•1977

  • The social science PhD

    J Hockey•Studies in Higher Education•1991

  • Content and context in knowledge production

    Wendy Bastalich•Studies in Higher Education•2017

  • Research Ethics in Japanese Higher Education

    Open Access•Bruce Macfarlane, Yoshiko Saitoh•Journal of Academic Ethics•2008

  • The allocation of prestigious positions in organizational science

    Open Access•C Chet Miller, William H Glick et al.•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2005

  • Preparing the Next Generation of Scientists

    Open Access•Robert A Campbell•Social Studies of Science•2003

  • A Measure of Originality

    Open Access•Lynn Dirk•Social Studies of Science•1999

  • Doctoring Uncertainty

    Open Access•Sara Delamont, Pauln Atkinson•Social Studies of Science•2001

  • Motives and Meaning amongst PhD Supervisors in the Social Sciences

    J Hockey•British Journal of Sociology of…•1996

  • Critical Mass and Pedagogic Continuity

    Sara Delamont, Odette Parry et al.•British Journal of Sociology of…•1997

  • Postdoctoral Life Scientists and Supervision Work in the Contemporary University

    Open Access•R Müller•Minerva•2014

  • How do National Career Systems Promote or Hinder the Emergence of New Research Lines

    Open Access•Grit Laudel•Minerva•2017

  • The Role of the Department and Discipline in Doctoral Student Attrition

    Chris M Golde•The Journal of Higher Education•2005

  • Preparing the Next Generation of Faculty

    Ann E Austin•The Journal of Higher Education•2002

  • What's too much and what's too little?”

    Sheena K Gardner, Susan K Gardner•The Journal of Higher Education•2008

  • Science as a Vocation in the 1990s

    E J Hackett•The Journal of Higher Education•1990

  • What Matters for Excellence in PhD Programs? Latent Constructs of Doctoral Program Quality Used by Early Career Social Scientists

    Emory Morrison, Elizabeth Rudd et al.•The Journal of Higher Education•2011

  • PhD Students' Evaluations of Research Supervision

    Herbert W Marsh, Kenneth J Rowe et al.•The Journal of Higher Education•2002

  • Entrance into the Academic Career

    J Scott Long, P D Allison et al.•American Sociological Review•1979

  • Competition in Science

    Warren O Hagstrom•American Sociological Review•1974

  • What is Originality in the Humanities and the Social Sciences

    Open Access•Joshua Guetzkow, M Lamont et al.•American Sociological Review•2004

  • Tradition and Innovation in Scientists' Research Strategies

    Open Access•Jacob G Foster, Andrey Rzhetsky et al.•American Sociological Review•2015

  • Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior

    Dean K Simonton•Psychological Bulletin•2003

  • Becoming a supervisor

    C Halse•Studies in Higher Education•2011

  • How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision

    A Lee•Studies in Higher Education•2008

  • The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason

    Open Access•Pierre Bourdieu•Social Science Information•1975

Unique citing works14
Citations per year3,5
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 14

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae