The Aesthetic Enkratic Principle
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4159397 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Irene Martínez Marín (0000-0002-9906-4973, Uppsala University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 63 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 251-268 |
| Publication date | 2023-05-24 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The British Journal of Aesthetics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-0904 • E-ISSN: 1468-2842 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/aesthj/ayac059 |
| OpenAlex | W4309845791 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 35 |
There is a dimension of rationality, known as structural rationality, according to which a paradigmatic example of what it means to be rational is not to be akratic. Although some philosophers claim that aesthetics falls within the scope of rationality, a non-akrasia constraint prohibiting certain combinations of attitudes is yet to be developed in this domain. This essay is concerned with the question of whether such a requirement is plausible and, if so, whether it is an actual requirement of aesthetic rationality. Ultimately, this paper defends the view that aesthetics is no different from other domains in that it requires coherence between a subject's mental states (in the aesthetic case, between what is judged and what is aesthetically liked
Aesthetics · Constraint (computer-aided design · Dimension (graph theory · Epistemology · Rationality · Scope (computer science · Sociology · Subject (documents · Computer Science · Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art · Mathematics · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Emotional Insight
Happiness and Meaning
Rationality Through Reasoning
Aesthetic knowledge
Making space for the normativity of coherence
The Conflict of Evidence and Coherence
Valuing and Caring
The Normativity of Nature
Towards a Reasonable Objectivism for Aesthetic Judgements
The Philosophy of Motion Pictures
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |