Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Peasant Emancipation and Russian Social Thought

The Case of Boris N. Chicherin

Bibliographic Data

ID4213708
AuthorsG M Hamburg (0000-0001-7021-159X, University of Notre Dame, corresponding author)
Year1991
Volume50
Issue4
Pages890-904
Publication date1991-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSlavic Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0037-6779 • E-ISSN: 2325-7784
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2500470
OpenAlexW2331894715
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited8

The problem of abolishing serfdom preoccupied Russian social thinkers long before the Emancipation in 1861. In spite of more than a century of scholarship devoted to analyzing the peasant question, however, historians have reached no consensus on such fundamental issues as the origins and political implications of abolitionist thought. Did advocacy of peasant emancipation by members of the landed nobility spring from liberal altruism or from a selfish desire to defend seigneurial interests against revolutionary peasants and the peasants' spokesmen, the so-called "revolutionary democrats"? Can Slavophilism and westernism be classified simply as varieties of liberalism, which, whatever their minor differences, agreed on the necessity of avoiding peasant revolution and regarded Russian radicals as pernicious enemies? Before emancipation were Russian liberals sharply differentiated ideologically from more radical intellectuals, such as Aleksandr I. Herzen and Nikolai G. Chernyshevskii-a differentiation traceable to attitudes toward the peasant emancipation? Or did the definitive split between liberalism and radicalism come after the Emancipation? Scholars bring to these questions such disparate conceptions of Russian politics and of the nature of historical proof that achieving consensus may be impossible. Nevertheless, the Soviet historian Vera F. Zakharina has argued convincingly that certain facets of the larger questions can be illuminated by investigating the ideological assumptions in the letters and programmatic works of major social thinkers and especially by observing how these assumptions changed over time

Emancipation · Ideology · Liberalism · Nobility · Peasant · Political economy · Political radicalism · Political science · Politics · Scholarship · Social science · Sociology · Law · Russia and Soviet political economy · Soviet and Russian History

  • Boris Nikolajevič Čičerin o ruských dějinách (státní škola jako historiografický a společenský fenomén)

    Josef Šaur•Boris Nikolajevič Čičerin o…•2015

  • Yuli Zhukovsky’s contribution to Russian debates on economic development of the 1860s–70s

    Anton Galeev•European Journal of the History…•2022

  • Portraits of Early Russian Liberals

    Open Access•Derek Offord•Portraits of Early Russian Liberals•1985

  • A History of Russian Thought from the Enlightenment to Marxism

    Andrzej Walicki•A History of Russian Thought from…•1979

  • Rehabilitating Tsarism

    Open Access•Ronald Grigor Suny•Comparative Studies in Society…•1989

  • The End of Serfdom

    Peter Czap, Daniel Field•The Russian Review•1977

  • Legal Philosophies of Russian Liberalism

    Priscilla R Roosevelt, Andrzej Walicki•The Russian Review•1989

  • Koshelev, Samarin, and Cherkassky and the Fate of Liberal Slavophilism

    Open Access•Richard Wortman•Slavic Review•1962

Citations per year0.18
Citation span2015 - 2022 (8)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae