Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Spatio-temporal unevenness in local land system regime shifts caused by land deals in Lao PDR

Bibliographic Data

ID4240600
AuthorsNicholas Magliocca (0000-0002-0971-0207, University of Alabama), Evan Ellicott (0000-0002-8308-8604, University of Maryland, College Park), Micah Ingalls (0000-0001-8724-9236, University of Bern), Michael Epprecht (University of Bern), Cornelia Hett (University of Bern), Vong Nanhthavong (0000-0002-4617-4052, University of Bern), Ariane De Bremond (0000-0002-0924-6053, University of Bern)
Year2022
Volume27
Issue4
Publication date2022-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueConservation Ecology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1195-5449 • E-ISSN: 1708-3087
PublisherResilience Alliance (PUBLISHER • CA)
DOI10.5751/es-13405-270407
OpenAlexW4312577876
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited66

Extensive land-use “regime shifts” have been observed as rapid transitions from natural land cover or subsistence-oriented land use to intensified and/or expanded commodity production. However, it is often unclear whether these land-use changes are part of broader land system regime shifts in which pre-existing production systems and livelihood strategies are fundamentally transformed along with observable land-use changes rather than simply displaced or eliminated. This is a critical social-environment question given that regime shifts are often a desired and intended outcome of national rural development and market-liberalization policies but must also be attentive to environmental conservation and/or climate change mitigation goals. We investigated whether nationally extensive land-use changes implemented through large-scale land deals in Lao People’s Democratic Republic resulted in full, partial, or no village- and landscape-level regime shifts in and around land deals. Overall, land deals triggered a wide variety of full, partial, and no regime shift outcomes. Land deals with both domestic and foreign investors produced positive and negative outcomes, although foreign land deals for the production of rubber led to significantly higher rates of indirect land-use change in impacted villages than domestic and/or non-rubber land deals. Also, financial compensation alone was insufficient to improve community well-being because it could be reinvested to perpetuate previous land uses without the desired transformation in livelihoods and rural development. Land deals that exhibited greater social embeddedness (i.e., provided adequate compensation complemented by job-creation and improved access to infrastructure and/or services) were more likely to lead to positive regime shifts. Our findings demonstrate that any land system regime shift will produce both winners and losers, and thus it becomes necessary to critically analyze the localized distribution of social and environmental costs and benefits within broader-scale land-use regime shifts

Agriculture · Business · Economics · Environmental resource management · Geography · Land degradation · Land tenure · Land use · Livelihood · Natural resource economics · Subsistence agriculture · Cambodian History and Society · Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies · Vietnamese History and Culture Studies · Ecology

  • Divergent outcomes of large-scale land transactions in Ethiopia

    Open Access•Chuan Liao, Arun Agrawal•Ecological Economics•2025

  • A transboundary agenda for nature-based solutions across sectors, scales and disciplines

    Open Access•Michelle Ann Miller, David Taylor•AMBIO•2024

  • Forest transition in Vietnam and displacement of deforestation abroad

    Open Access•Patrick Meyfroidt, Eric F Lambin•Proceedings of the National…•2009

  • Farming the planet

    Open Access•Chad Monfreda, Navin Ramankutty et al.•Global Biogeochemical Cycles•2008

  • The geography of large-scale land acquisitions

    Open Access•P Messerli, Markus Giger et al.•Applied Geography•2014

  • Accelerated deforestation driven by large-scale land acquisitions in Cambodia

    Open Access•Keith F Davis, Kyle Frankel Davis et al.•Nature Geoscience•2015

  • Global land and water grabbing

    Open Access•Maria Cristina Rulli, Antonio Saviori et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2013

  • Social-ecological systems as complex adaptive systems

    Open Access•Simon A Levin, Simon Levin et al.•Environment and Development…•2013

  • Regime Shifts, Resilience, and Biodiversity in Ecosystem Management

    Carl Folke, Steve Carpenter et al.•Annual Review of Ecology,…•2004

  • Equity and sustainability in the Anthropocene

    Open Access•Macedward Leach, Belinda Reyers et al.•Global Sustainability•2018

  • Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems

    Open Access•Marten Scheffer, R Carpenter et al.•Nature•2001

  • The Rubber Juggernaut

    Open Access•Alan D Ziegler, Jefferson Fox et al.•Science•2009

  • Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching

    Open Access•Marco Caliendo, Sabine Kopeinig•Journal of Economic Surveys•2008

  • High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change

    Open Access•Matthew C Hansen, Peter Potapov et al.•Science•2013

  • The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects

    Paul R Rosenbaum, Donald B Rubin•Biometrika•1983

  • Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity

    Open Access•Eric F Lambin, Patrick Meyfroidt•Proceedings of the National…•2011

  • Spatial patterns of large‐scale land transactions and their potential socio‐environmental outcomes in Cambodia, Ethiopia, Liberia, and Peru

    Open Access•C Liao, Suhyun Jung et al.•Land Degradation and Development•2020

  • Poverty trends in villages affected by land-based investments in rural Laos

    Open Access•Vong Nanhthavong, Michael Epprecht et al.•Applied Geography•2020

  • Defensive Environmentalists and the Dynamics of Global Reform

    Open Access•Thomas Rudel•Defensive Environmentalists and…•2013

  • Configurational Comparative Methods

    Benoît Rihoux, C C Ragin et al.•Comparative methods•2009

  • From nouns to verbs

    Open Access•Tom Hertz, Martín Meráz García et al.•People and Nature•2020

  • A global assessment of market accessibility and market influence for global environmental change studies

    Open Access•Peter H Verburg, Erle C Ellis et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2011

  • Multiple pathways of commodity crop expansion in tropical forest landscapes

    Open Access•Patrick Meyfroidt, K M Carlson et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2014

  • Direct and indirect land-use change caused by large-scale land acquisitions in Cambodia

    Open Access•Nicholas Magliocca, Quy Van Khuc et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2019

  • Traps and Sustainable Development in Rural Areas

    Open Access•L Jamila Haider, Wiebren J Boonstra et al.•World Development•2018

  • The long land grab

    Maggie Dwyer, Thoumthone Vongvisouk•Territory Politics Governance•2017

  • Governing flows in telecoupled land systems

    Open Access•Darla K Munroe, Mateus Batistella et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2019

  • Land system science and the 2030 agenda

    Open Access•Albrecht Ehrensperger, Ariane De Bremond et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2019

  • Assessments of synergistic outcomes from sustainable intensification of agriculture need to include smallholder livelihoods with food production and ecosystem services

    Open Access•C Liao, David G Brown•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2018

  • From global drivers to local land-use change

    Open Access•Victoria Junquera, Patrick Meyfroidt et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2020

  • Modelling the location and spatial pattern of a crop boom. A case study from Laos

    Open Access•Christine Ornetsmüller, Jean-Christophe Castella et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2019

  • Anatomy of a boom

    Open Access•Sango Mahanty, Sarah Milne•Asia Pacific Viewpoint•2016

  • Conducting Configurational Comparative Research With Qualitative Comparative Analysis

    Open Access•Alrik Thiem•American Journal of Evaluation•2016

  • Trajectories of deforestation, coffee expansion and displacement of shifting cultivation in the Central Highlands of Vietnam

    Open Access•Patrick Meyfroidt, Tan Phuong Vu et al.•Global Environmental Change•2013

  • Crop booms at the forest frontier

    Open Access•Victoria Junquera, Adrienne Grêt-Regamey•Global Environmental Change•2019

  • Paper park performance

    Open Access•Allen Blackman, Alexander Pfaff et al.•Global Environmental Change•2015

  • The transboundary displacement of deforestation under Redd

    Open Access•Micah L Ingalls, Micah Ingalls et al.•Global Environmental Change•2018

  • Regime shifts limit the predictability of land-system change

    Open Access•Daniel Müller, Zhanli Sun et al.•Global Environmental Change•2014

  • Sustainable livelihoods in the global land rush? Archetypes of livelihood vulnerability and sustainability potentials

    Open Access•Christoph Oberlack, Laura Tejada et al.•Global Environmental Change•2016

  • Meta-analyses of case studies

    Open Access•T K Rudel•Global Environmental Change•2007

  • Pathways to human well-being in the context of land acquisitions in Lao PDR

    Open Access•Vong Nanhthavong, Christoph Oberlack et al.•Global Environmental Change•2021

  • The Global Water Grabbing Syndrome

    Open Access•Jampel Dell’angelo, Maria Cristina Rulli et al.•Ecological Economics•2017

  • Resilience thinking meets social theory

    Open Access•Muriel Côte, Andrea J Nightingale•Progress in Human Geography•2011

  • Implications of poverty traps across levels

    Open Access•Sonja Radosavljevic, L Jamila Haider et al.•World Development•2021

  • Quantifying Spillover Effects from Large Land-based Investment

    Open Access•Klaus Deininger, Fang Xia•World Development•2016

  • Fractal poverty traps

    Open Access•Christopher B Barrett, Brent M Swallow et al.•World Development•2005

  • Rush for cash crops and forest protection

    Open Access•Thoumthone Vongvisouk, Rikke B Broegaard et al.•Land Use Policy•2016

  • The Anthropocene

    Open Access•Will Steffen, Åsa Persson et al.•AMBIO•2011

  • Assessing Bias in the Estimation of Causal Effects

    Open Access•T Diprete, Thomas A Diprete et al.•Sociological Methodology•2004

  • Changing agents of deforestation

    Open Access•T K Rudel•Land Use Policy•2006

  • Middle-range theories of land system change

    Open Access•Patrick Meyfroidt, Rinku Roy Chowdhury et al.•Global Environmental Change•2018

  • Land system science and sustainable development of the earth system

    Open Access•Peter H Verburg, Neville Crossman et al.•Anthropocene•2015

  • The power problematic

    Open Access•Micah L Ingalls, Micah Ingalls et al.•Conservation Ecology•2016

  • Two of a kind? Large-scale land acquisitions and commodity frontier expansion in Argentina's Dry Chaco

    Open Access•Nicholas R Magliocca, Nicholas Magliocca et al.•Conservation Ecology•2022

  • A multiscale gaming approach to understand farmer's decision making in the boom of maize cultivation in Laos

    Open Access•Christine Ornetsmüller, Jean-Christophe Castella et al.•Conservation Ecology•2018

  • Rents, Actors, and the Expansion of Commodity Frontiers in the Gran Chaco

    Yann Le Polain De Waroux, Matthias Baumann et al.•Annals of the American…•2018

  • Complex Land Systems

    Open Access•John A Dearing, Ademola K Braimoh et al.•Conservation Ecology•2010

  • Land-use regime shifts

    Open Access•Navin Ramankutty, Oliver T Coomes•Conservation Ecology•2016

  • Capturing emergent phenomena in social-ecological systems

    Open Access•Maja Schlüter, L Jamila Haider et al.•Conservation Ecology•2019

  • Archetypical pathways of direct and indirect land-use change caused by Cambodia's economic land concessions

    Open Access•Nicholas R Magliocca, Nicholas Magliocca et al.•Conservation Ecology•2019

  • Model Ambiguities in Configurational Comparative Research

    Open Access•Michael Baumgartner, Alrik Thiem•Sociological Methods & Research•2017

  • Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets

    Carsten Q Schneider, Claudius Wagemann•Comparative Sociology•2010

  • Problems for the plantations

    Open Access•Ian G Baird•Journal of Agrarian Change•2020

  • Tapping into rubber

    Juliet N Lu•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2017

  • Methodological reflections on 'land grab' databases and the 'land grab' literature 'rush

    Carlos Oya•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2013

  • Expansion of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) in Mainland Southeast Asia

    Jefferson Fox, Jean-Christophe Castella•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2013

  • Land grabs, land control, and Southeast Asian crop booms

    Derek Hall•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2011

  • Dynamics of Shifting Cultivation Landscapes in Northern Lao PDR Between 2000 and 2009 Based on an Analysis of Modis Time Series and Landsat Images

    Open Access•Kaspar Hurni, Cornelia Hett et al.•Human Ecology•2013

Unique citing works2
Citations per year1
Citation span2024 - 2025 (2)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae