Direct and indirect land-use change caused by large-scale land acquisitions in Cambodia

Bibliographic Data

ID15545288
AuthorsNicholas Magliocca (0000-0002-0971-0207, University of Alabama, corresponding author), Quy Van Khuc (0000-0001-9516-2413, Phenikaa University), Ariane De Bremond (0000-0002-0924-6053, University of Bern), Evan A Ellicott, Evan Ellicott (0000-0002-8308-8604, University of Maryland, College Park)
Year2019
Volume15
Issue2
Pages024010-024010
Publication date2019-12-18
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Research Letters (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326
PublisherIOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/ab6397
OpenAlexW2995204935
LanguageEN
Citations received18
References cited35

Large-scale land acquisitions (LSLAs) have received considerable scholarly attention over the last decade, and progress has been made towards quantifying their direct impacts. There is also a growing recognition of the importance of indirect effects of LSLAs, such as ‘spillover’ or indirect land-use change (iLUC), and the substantial challenges they pose for attribution and quantification. In fact, the relative contributions of direct and indirect LUC associated with LSLAs are unknown. This study aims to address these knowledge gaps using Economic Land Concessions (ELCs) in Cambodia, now the most targeted country for LSLAs in Southeast Asia. We leverage findings on archetypical pathways of direct and indirect LUC in Cambodia, developed through previous mixed-methods synthesis efforts, to quantify remotely sensed forest loss to specific ELCs. During 2000–2016, Cambodia roughly 1611 kha of forest, or 22% of total forest cover. Although ELCs (as of 2016) contained roughly 16% of Cambodia’s forest cover (2000), forest lost within ELC boundaries accounted for nearly 30% (476 kha) of total forest lost by 2016. Furthermore, iLUC contributed an additional 49–174 kha of forest loss (3.0%–10.7% of all forest lost in Cambodia) over the same period. Thus, iLUC contributed to Cambodia’s total forest loss at the rate of 11.4%–40.8% of direct LUC caused by ELCs. Such findings suggest that the total amount of LUC caused by LSLAs may well be underestimated globally. This and related synthesis research efforts can be valuable approaches for better targeting remote sensing analyses to specific locations and time periods needed to disentangle and quantify forest loss due to direct and indirect land change processes

Agroforestry · Biology · Cartography · Deforestation (computer science · Forest cover · Geography · Land cover · Land use · Land use, land-use change and forestry · Leverage (statistics · Scale (ratio · Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Environmental Science · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Ecology · Forestry

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access