Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Archetypical pathways of direct and indirect land-use change caused by Cambodia's economic land concessions

Bibliographic Data

ID4239227
AuthorsNicholas R Magliocca, Nicholas Magliocca (0000-0002-0971-0207, University of Alabama), Quy Van Khuc (0000-0001-9516-2413, University of Alabama), Evan A Ellicott, Evan Ellicott (0000-0002-8308-8604, University of Maryland, College Park), Ariane De Bremond (0000-0002-0924-6053, University of Bern)
Year2019
Volume24
Issue2
Pagesart25
Publication date2019-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueConservation Ecology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1195-5449 • E-ISSN: 1708-3087
PublisherResilience Alliance (PUBLISHER • CA)
DOI10.5751/es-10954-240225
OpenAlexW2950222903
LanguageEN
Citations received17
References cited55

Magliocca, N. R., Q. Van Khuc, E. A. Ellicott, and A. de Bremond. 2019. Archetypical pathways of direct and indirect land-use change caused by Cambodia’s economic land concessions. Ecology and Society 24(2):25. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10954-240225

Biology · Geography · Land use · Land use, land-use change and forestry · Cambodian History and Society · Ecology

  • Archetype analysis in sustainability research

    Open Access•Christoph Oberlack, Diana Sietz et al.•Conservation Ecology•2019

  • Spatio-temporal unevenness in local land system regime shifts caused by land deals in Lao PDR

    Open Access•Nicholas Magliocca, Evan Ellicott et al.•Conservation Ecology•2022

  • Avenues of archetype analysis

    Open Access•Klaus Eisenack, Christoph Oberlack et al.•Conservation Ecology•2021

  • Why do large-scale agricultural investments induce different socio-economic, food security, and environmental impacts? Evidence from Kenya, Madagascar, and Mozambique

    Open Access•Christoph Oberlack, Markus Giger et al.•Conservation Ecology•2021

  • Land-use changes associated with large-scale land transactions in Ethiopia

    Open Access•Tim G Williams, Sadie A Trush et al.•Conservation Ecology•2021

  • Archetype analysis in sustainability research

    Open Access•Diana Sietz, Ulrich Frey et al.•Conservation Ecology•2019

  • Taking stock of and advancing knowledge on interaction archetypes at the nexus between land, biodiversity, food and climate

    Open Access•Diana Sietz, Regina Neudert•Environmental Research Letters•2022

  • Direct and indirect land-use change caused by large-scale land acquisitions in Cambodia

    Open Access•Nicholas Magliocca, Quy Van Khuc et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2019

  • Integrating inductive and deductive analysis to identify and characterize archetypical social-ecological systems and their changes

    Open Access•Manuel Pacheco-Romero, Manuel Pacheco‐Romero et al.•Landscape and Urban Planning•2021

  • Understanding archetypal spatial gradient patterns in urban economic, population and air quality nexus

    Open Access•Ping Zhang, Hao Wu et al.•Sustainable Cities and Society•2023

  • Using case study data to understand SES interactions

    Open Access•Sergio Villamayor-Toma, Christoph Oberlack et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2020

  • Agency shifts in agricultural land governance and their implications for land degradation neutrality

    Open Access•Niels Debonne, Jasper van Vliet et al.•Global Environmental Change•2021

  • Patterns of rural collective action in contemporary China

    Open Access•Rongyu Wang, Rong Tan•Journal of Rural Studies•2020

  • Chinese sisal estates and smallholder land uses and livelihoods, Kilosa, Central Tanzania

    Open Access•Puyang Li, Yujia Zhang et al.•World Development•2024

  • Understanding the role of illicit transactions in land-change dynamics

    Open Access•Beth Tellman, Nicholas Magliocca et al.•Nature Sustainability•2020

  • Large-scale agricultural investments in Eastern Africa

    Open Access•Julie G Zaehringer, P Messerli et al.•Ecosystems and People•2021

  • Driving forces of forest cover rehabilitation and implications for forest transition, environmental management and upland sustainable development in Vietnam

    Open Access•Quy Van Khuc, Bao Quang Tran et al.•Environment Development and…•2023

  • Approaches to Qualitative-Quantitative Methodological Triangulation

    Janice M Morse•Nursing Research•1991

  • Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century

    Open Access•Ruth Defries, Ruth S DeFries et al.•Nature Geoscience•2010

  • Archetypical patterns and trajectories of land systems in Europe

    Open Access•Christian Levers, Daniel Müller et al.•Regional Environmental Change•2018

  • Approaches and terminology for causal analysis in land systems science

    Open Access•Patrick Meyfroidt•Journal of Land Use Science•2016

  • The geography of large-scale land acquisitions

    Open Access•P Messerli, Markus Giger et al.•Applied Geography•2014

  • Accelerated deforestation driven by large-scale land acquisitions in Cambodia

    Open Access•Keith F Davis, Kyle Frankel Davis et al.•Nature Geoscience•2015

  • Global land and water grabbing

    Open Access•Maria Cristina Rulli, Antonio Saviori et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2013

  • Developing a science of land change

    Open Access•Ronald R Rindfuss, Stephen J Walsh et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2004

  • Cambodia's Unofficial Regime of Extraction

    Sarah Milne•Bulletin of Concerned Asian…•2015

  • Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching

    Open Access•Marco Caliendo, Sabine Kopeinig•Journal of Economic Surveys•2008

  • Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity

    Open Access•Eric F Lambin, Patrick Meyfroidt•Proceedings of the National…•2011

  • Configurational Comparative Methods

    Benoît Rihoux, C C Ragin et al.•Comparative methods•2009

  • Resilience in the global food system

    Open Access•David A Seekell, David Seekell et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2017

  • Statistical confirmation of indirect land use change in the Brazilian Amazon

    Open Access•Eugênio Arima, Peter Richards et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2011

  • A global assessment of market accessibility and market influence for global environmental change studies

    Open Access•Peter H Verburg, Erle C Ellis et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2011

  • Large scale land acquisitions and Redd

    Open Access•Sarah Carter, Ameur M Manceur et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2017

  • Multiple pathways of commodity crop expansion in tropical forest landscapes

    Open Access•Patrick Meyfroidt, K M Carlson et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2014

  • Deforestation risk due to commodity crop expansion in sub-Saharan Africa

    Open Access•Elsa M Ordway, Gregory P Asner et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2017

  • Triangulation and Mixed Methods Research

    Open Access•Donna M Mertens, Sharlene Hesse‐biber•Journal of Mixed Methods Research•2012

  • Drivers of deforestation and forest degradation in Vietnam

    Open Access•Quy Van Khuc, Bao Quang Tran et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2018

  • Anatomy of a boom

    Open Access•Sango Mahanty, Sarah Milne•Asia Pacific Viewpoint•2016

  • The Politics and Ethics of Land Concessions in Rural Cambodia

    Open Access•A Neef, Touch Siphat et al.•Journal of Agricultural and…•2013

  • Closing global knowledge gaps

    Open Access•Nicholas Magliocca, Erle C Ellis et al.•Global Environmental Change•2018

  • Mapping global land system archetypes

    Open Access•Tomáš Václavík, Sven Lautenbach et al.•Global Environmental Change•2013

  • Paper park performance

    Open Access•Allen Blackman, Alexander Pfaff et al.•Global Environmental Change•2015

  • Regionalisation of global insights into dryland vulnerability

    Open Access•Diana Sietz•Global Environmental Change•2014

  • Sustainable livelihoods in the global land rush? Archetypes of livelihood vulnerability and sustainability potentials

    Open Access•Christoph Oberlack, Laura Tejada et al.•Global Environmental Change•2016

  • The Global Water Grabbing Syndrome

    Open Access•Jampel Dell’angelo, Maria Cristina Rulli et al.•Ecological Economics•2017

  • Quantifying Spillover Effects from Large Land-based Investment

    Open Access•Klaus Deininger, Fang Xia•World Development•2016

  • The Tragedy of the Grabbed Commons

    Open Access•Jampel Dell’angelo, Paolo D’odorico et al.•World Development•2016

  • Self-sufficiency or surplus

    Open Access•Arnim Scheidel, M Giampietro et al.•Land Use Policy•2013

  • Exploring trade-offs between development and conservation outcomes in Northern Cambodia

    Open Access•Emilie Beauchamp, Tom Clements et al.•Land Use Policy•2018

  • A view from the top

    Sara Keene, Marygold Walsh-Dilley et al.•Canadian Journal of Development…•2015

  • Human Rights Responses to Land Grabbing

    Christophe Golay, Irene Biglino•Third World Quarterly•2013

  • Meta-studies in land use science

    Open Access•Jasper van Vliet, Nicholas R Magliocca et al.•AMBIO•2016

  • Survival Analysis in Land Change Science

    Li An, David G Brown et al.•Annals of the Association of…•2008

  • Gendered eviction, protest and recovery

    Vanessa Lamb, Laura Schoenberger et al.•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2017

  • Assessing Bias in the Estimation of Causal Effects

    Open Access•T Diprete, Thomas A Diprete et al.•Sociological Methodology•2004

  • Global Land Grabs

    M Edelman, Carlos Oya et al.•Third World Quarterly•2013

  • Middle-range theories of land system change

    Open Access•Patrick Meyfroidt, Rinku Roy Chowdhury et al.•Global Environmental Change•2018

  • Organizing against Land Grabbing in Cambodia

    Open Access•Willemijn Verkoren, Chorswang Ngin et al.•Development and Change•2017

  • From Force to Legitimation

    Open Access•A Beban, Sokbunthoeun So et al.•Development and Change•2017

  • Laos and the making of a 'relational' resource frontier

    Open Access•Katelyn Barney, Keith Barney•Geographical Journal•2009

  • Archetype analysis in sustainability research

    Open Access•Christoph Oberlack, Diana Sietz et al.•Conservation Ecology•2019

  • The Global Land Grab Meta-Narrative, Asian Money Laundering and Elite Capture

    Ian G Baird•Geopolitics•2014

  • Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets

    Carsten Q Schneider, Claudius Wagemann•Comparative Sociology•2010

  • Globalisation and the foreignisation of space

    A Zoomers•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2010

  • The rise of flex crops and commodities

    Saturnino M Borras Jr, Saturnino M Borra et al.•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2016

  • The formalization fix? Land titling, land concessions and the politics of spatial transparency in Cambodia

    Maggie Dwyer, Michael B Dwyer•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2015

  • The geopolitics of Brazilian soybeans

    Gustavo De L T Oliveira•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2016

  • Like gold with yield

    Madeleine Fairbairn•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2014

  • Creating a public tool to assess and promote transparency in global land deals

    Ward Anseeuw, Jotham Lay et al.•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2013

  • The politics of evidence

    Open Access•I Scoones, R Hall et al.•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2013

  • Messy hectares

    M Edelman•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2013

  • The international political economy of the global land rush

    Lorenzo Cotula•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2012

Unique citing works17
Citations per year2,43
Citation span2019 - 2024 (6)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 11

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae