Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Portraiture and the Ethics of Alterity

Giacometti vis-à-vis Levinas

Bibliographic Data

ID4300393
AuthorsLeo Costello (LEO COSTELLO is Associate Professor of Art History at Rice University. He is the author of J.M.W. Turner and the Subject of History (Ashgate, 2012). He is now at work on a manuscript entitled “Pictures of Nothing: Romantic Figurations of the Void.”, corresponding author)
Year2015
Volume151
Pages62-77
Publication date2015-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueOctober (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0162-2870 • E-ISSN: 1536-013X
PublisherMIT Press - Journals (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1162/octo_a_00208
OpenAlexW2098598080
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited5

One of the primary critical investigations around the work of Alberto Giacometti has been his experience of a crisis in representation: the anguished realization of his inability to re-create his perceptions. Indeed, while this crisis came to the fore at various times in his life, it forms the hinge on which his career is taken to turn, because it marked his rejection of the principles of Surrealism. As the oft-repeated story goes, when André Breton heard that Giacometti had returned to study from live models, he scoffed, saying, "Everyone knows what a head looks like." Breton was right to sense the chasm that separated him from Giacometti, but the latter's reply, that "no one has ever really looked at a face before," suggests that Breton had failed to grasp the nature of the divide. Giacometti's return to study from life was precipitated by a profound sense of doubt about the most apparently basic artistic transaction, that of looking carefully and representing what he has seen. This skepticism about the very possibility of representation, which was nonetheless coupled with an abiding sense of purpose about the importance of attempting it, was central to Giacometti's approach to the figure. Giacometti knew well that artists before him, Cézanne and Picasso in particular, had shared a similar mix of compulsion and suspicion about representation. Giacometti, however, seems not only to have understood the extent of that dilemma to a degree that his predecessors had not, but to have been compelled by it. In short, the more that doubt seemed to fill Giacometti in the face of the Other, the more urgent the task of trying to represent it became

Aesthetics · Alterity · Art · Epistemology · Face (sociological concept · Perception · Political science · Psychoanalysis · Representation (politics · Skepticism · Law · Philosophy · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism · Psychology · Visual Culture and Art Theory · Walter Benjamin Studies Compilation

  • Manufacturing Life Through Science and Art Interaction

    Open Access•Emre Sünter•NanoEthics•2022

  • Baroque, Breakout, and Education Without Organs

    Open Access•A Jonathan Eakle, Jonathan Eakle•Qualitative Inquiry•2017

  • Questions to Luce Irigaray

    Open Access•Katrina Ince, Kate Ince•Hypatia•1996

  • Levinas

    Open Access•Morny Joy•Studies in Religion/Sciences…•1993

Citations per year0.22
Citation span2017 - 2022 (6)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae