What is it Like to be a Phenomenologist

Bibliographic Data

ID4352100
AuthorsKelly Dean Jolley (0009-0009-6665-9055, Auburn University), Michael J Watkins (Auburn University), Michael Watkins (0000-0003-4751-9398)
Year1998
Volume48
Issue191
Pages204-209
Publication date1998-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Philosophical Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-8094 • E-ISSN: 1467-9213
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1111/1467-9213.00094
OpenAlexW2047543946
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited5

In a recent paper, ‘On the Persistence of Phenomenology’ (in T. Metzinger (ed.), Conscious Experience, Paderborn, 1995), Diana Raffman presents a new argument for qualia, an argument that provides new focus for the qualia debate. We think Raffman's work relocates the debate to a better neighbourhood, a neighbourhood in which what tempts us to think that there must be qualia or phenomenal information is highlighted. Raffman, we argue, locates the core thought shared by many of the friends of qualia, namely, that our conceptual resources are inadequate for capturing the richness of experience. Experience is ineffably determinate. Moreover, Raffman's argument in support of this thought seems especially embarrassing to scientific‐minded materialists, since the argument relies largely on well established empirical facts. We show, however, that Raffman's argument fails. So, if we are correct that her argument highlights what is tempting about qualia, then we have also shown that it is not tempting

Art · Art history · Library science · Sociology · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy · Philosophy

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub