Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Question-Answer Requirement for scope assignment

Bibliographic Data

ID4568972
AuthorsAndrea Gualmini (Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics, corresponding author), Sarah Hulsey (IIT@MIT), Valentine Hacquard (0000-0003-3854-0312, University of Maryland, College Park), Danny Fox (IIT@MIT)
Year2008
Volume16
Issue3
Publication date2008-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueNatural Language Semantics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0925-854X • E-ISSN: 1572-865X
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11050-008-9029-z
OpenAlexW2139827754
LanguageEN
Citations received83
References cited20

This paper focuses on children’s interpretation of sentences containing negation and a quantifier (e.g., The detective didn’t find some guys). Recent studies suggest that, although children are capable of accessing inverse scope interpretations of such sentences, they resort to surface scope to a larger extent than adults. To account for children’s behavioral pattern, we propose a new factor at play in Truth Value Judgment tasks: the Question–Answer Requirement (QAR). According to the QAR, children (and adults) must interpret the target sentence that they evaluate as an answer to a question that is made salient by the discourse

Cognitive psychology · Epistemology · Linguistics · Metaphysics · Natural language processing · Negation · Philosophy of language · Programming language · Salient · Sentence · Syntax · Truth value · Computer Science · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Philosophy · Psychology · Topic Modeling · Artificial Intelligence

  • Teaching and Learning Guide for

    Open Access•Napoleon Katsos, Chris Cummins•Language and Linguistics Compass•2010

  • Investigating the form-meaning mapping in the acquisition of English and Japanese measure phrase comparatives

    Open Access•Tomoe Arii, Kristen Syrett et al.•Natural Language Semantics•2017

  • Antecedent-Contained Deletion

    Kristen Syrett•Oxford Handbook of Experimental…•2019

  • Negation

    Ye Tian, Richard Breheny•Oxford Handbook of Experimental…•2019

  • Vagueness

    Sam Alxatib, Uli Sauerland•Oxford Handbook of Experimental…•2019

  • Politeness

    T Holtgraves, Thomas M Holtgraves•Oxford Handbook of Experimental…•2019

  • Metonymy

    Petra B Schumacher•Oxford Handbook of Experimental…•2019

  • Word Senses

    Hugh Rabagliati, Mahesh Srinivasan•Oxford Handbook of Experimental…•2019

  • Scalar Implicatures

    Richard Breheny•Oxford Handbook of Experimental…•2019

  • Counterfactuals

    Heather J Ferguson, Heather Ferguson•Oxford Handbook of Experimental…•2019

  • Exhaustivity in It -Clefts

    Edgar Onea•Oxford Handbook of Experimental…•2019

  • Constraint-Based Pragmatic Processing

    Judith Degen, Michael K Tanenhaus•Oxford Handbook of Experimental…•2019

  • Theory of Mind

    Paula Rubio-Fernández•Oxford Handbook of Experimental…•2019

  • Language Comprehension, Inference, and Alternatives

    Dimitrios Skordos, David Barner•Oxford Handbook of Experimental…•2019

  • Plurality

    Lyn Tieu, Jacopo Romoli•Oxford Handbook of Experimental…•2019

  • Genericity

    Dimitra Lazaridou-Chatzigoga•Oxford Handbook of Experimental…•2019

  • Focus

    Christina S Kim•Oxford Handbook of Experimental…•2019

  • Pronouns

    Hannah Rohde•Oxford Handbook of Experimental…•2019

  • Verbal Uncertainty

    Marie Juanchich, Miroslav Sirota et al.•Oxford Handbook of Experimental…•2019

  • Quantifier Spreading

    Patricia J Brooks, Olga Parshina•Oxford Handbook of Experimental…•2019

  • Presuppositions, Projection, and Accommodation

    Florian Schwarz•Oxford Handbook of Experimental…•2019

  • Reference and Informativeness

    Catherine Davies, J E Arnold•Oxford Handbook of Experimental…•2019

  • Modified Numerals

    Rick Nouwen, Stavroula Alexandropoulou et al.•Oxford Handbook of Experimental…•2019

  • Distributivity

    Kristen Syrett•Oxford Handbook of Experimental…•2019

  • Adjective Meaning and Scales

    Stephanie Solt•Oxford Handbook of Experimental…•2019

  • Negative Polarity Items

    Ming Xiang•Oxford Handbook of Experimental…•2019

  • Event (De)composition

    Sherry Yong Chen, E Matthew Husband•Oxford Handbook of Experimental…•2019

  • Spatial Terms

    Myrto Grigoroglou, Anna Papafragou•Oxford Handbook of Experimental…•2019

  • Ironic Utterances

    Nicola Spotorno, Ira Noveck•Oxford Handbook of Experimental…•2019

  • Metaphor

    Nausicaa Pouscoulous, Giulio Dulcinati•Oxford Handbook of Experimental…•2019

  • Turn-Taking

    Jan P De Ruiter•Oxford Handbook of Experimental…•2019

  • Quantification

    Adrian Brasoveanu, Jakub Dotlačil•Oxford Handbook of Experimental…•2019

  • Prosody and Meaning

    Judith Tonhauser•Oxford Handbook of Experimental…•2019

  • The Oxford Handbook of Ellipsis

    Jeroen Van Craenenbroeck, Tanja Temmerman•Oxford Handbook of Ellipsis•2018

  • The Oxford Handbook of Experimental Semantics and Pragmatics

    Chris Cummins, Napoleon Katsos•Oxford Handbook of Experimental…•2019

  • Embedded Scalars, Preferred Readings and Prosody

    Michael Franke, Fabian Schlotterbeck et al.•Journal of Semantics•2016

  • Solving Learnability Problems in the Acquisition of Semantics

    Andrea Gualmini, B Schwarz•Journal of Semantics•2009

  • Cross-linguistic scope ambiguity

    Open Access•Yongjia Song, Abimael Hernandez Jimenez et al.•Proceedings of the Linguistic…•2021

  • The State-Before-Event Inference Emerges Across Tenses

    Open Access•Elena Marx, Natalia Jardón et al.•Open MIND•2025

  • When pragmatics matters more for truth-value judgments

    Open Access•Gregory Scontras, Lisa Pearl et al.•Glossa a journal of general…•2021

  • A Collective-Distributive Pragmatic Scale and the Developing Lexicon

    Open Access•John Grinstead, Ramón Padilla-Reyes et al.•Language Learning and Development•2021

  • Understanding disjunction

    Open Access•Masuyo Ito•Language Acquisition•2026

  • The acquisition of wh- questions

    An D Nguyen, Géraldine Légendre•Language Acquisition•2022

  • Piecewise Structural Equation Modeling of the collective implicature in child language

    Open Access•John Grinstead, Ramón Padilla-Reyes et al.•Language Acquisition•2024

  • On the source of children’s conjunctive interpretation of disjunction

    Hiroyuki Shimada, Takuya Goro•Language Acquisition•2021

  • On the source of children’s conjunctive interpretation of disjunction

    Hiroyuki Shimada, Takuya Goro•Language Acquisition•2020

  • What could have been said? Alternatives and variability in pragmatic inferences

    Open Access•Eszter Ronai, Ming Xiang•Journal of Memory and Language•2024

  • Prosodic Resolution of Quantifier Scope Ambiguity in Child Mandarin

    Open Access•Haiquan Huang, Ziyu Wei et al.•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•2026

  • Verb‐echo answers in Japanese do not call for syntactic head movement

    Open Access•Tomoya Tanabe, Ryota Kobayashi•Studia Linguistica•2024

  • Quantifier spreading and the question under discussion

    Open Access•Dimitrios Skordos, Allyson Myers et al.•Cognition•2022

  • What hinders child semantic computation

    Open Access•Utako Minai, Nobuyuki Jincho et al.•Journal of Child Language•2012

  • Does hearing “and” help children understand “or”? Insights into scales and relevance from the acquisition of disjunction in child Romanian

    Open Access•Adina Camelia Bleotu, Mara Panaitescu et al.•Journal of Child Language•2025

  • The observation of superiority on multiple movements to the Italian left-periphery

    Open Access•Vincenzo Moscati•Journal of Child Language•2025

  • Events and agents in the acquisition of universal quantification

    Kristen Syrett•Theoretical Linguistics•2015

  • Preschoolers’ comprehension of exhaustive focus

    Open Access•Lilla Pintér, Balázs Surányi•First Language•2023

  • Embedded Implicatures and Experimental Constraints

    Open Access•Uli Sauerland•Semantics and Pragmatics•2010

  • Donkeys under discussion

    Open Access•Lucas Champollion, Dylan Bumford et al.•Semantics and Pragmatics•2019

  • Might do better

    Open Access•Bob Beddor, Andy Egan•Semantics and Pragmatics•2018

  • QUD effects on epistemic containment principle

    Open Access•Jeong, Sunwoo Jeong•ZAS Papers in Linguistics•2018

  • The pronoun interpretation problem in child Hungarian

    Open Access•György Rákosi, Enikő Tóth•Acta Linguistica Hungarica•2016

  • ‘The More, the Better?’ An Experimental Investigation on the Role of Sentential Negation in the Acquisition of Italian Nessuno

    Open Access•Letizia Raminelli, Desiré Carioti et al.•First Language•2026

  • Children’s exhaustive readings of questions

    Anita Cremers, Alexandre Cremers et al.•Language Acquisition•2016

  • Isomorphism for All (but Not Both )

    Lyn Tieu•Language Acquisition•2015

  • Discourse context cannot make ‘or’ inclusive (only experimental task can)

    Open Access•A Fishman, Daniel Asherov et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2023

  • The rise and fall of Isomorphism

    Open Access•Andrea Gualmini•Lingua•2008

  • The only one strategy in context

    Open Access•Francesca Foppolo, Luisa Meroni et al.•Lingua•2014

  • Children's comprehension of distributive universal quantification

    Open Access•Ken Drozd, Heather K J Van Der Lely et al.•Lingua•2017

  • Mandarin-speaking children’s acquisition of the additive particle ye ‘also’

    Open Access•Haiquan Huang, Yixiong Chen et al.•Lingua•2025

  • Pragmatic inferences are QUD-sensitive

    Open Access•Eszter Ronai, Ming Xiang•Journal of Linguistics•2020

  • Prosodic disambiguation of scopally ambiguous quantificational sentences in a discourse context

    Open Access•Kristen Syrett, Georgia Rosemarie Simon et al.•Journal of Linguistics•2014

  • A pragmatic constraint on ambiguity detection

    Open Access•Marie-Christine Meyer, Uli Sauerland•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2009

  • A two-source hypothesis for Gapping

    Open Access•Deborah Potter, Michael Frazier et al.•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2017

  • Why is children’s interpretation of doubly quantified sentences non-isomorphic

    Open Access•Katalin E Ki, Katalin É Kiss et al.•Linguistics•2017

  • Piecewise Structural Equation Modeling of the Quantity Implicature in Child Language

    Open Access•John Grinstead, Pedro Ortiz-Ramírez et al.•Language and Speech•2023

  • No "Chinese-speaking phase" in Chinese Children's Early Grammar - A Study of the Scope between Negation and Universal Quantification in Mandarin Chinese

    Open Access•Fan Li, Li Fan•Lingua•2017

  • Acquisition of the syntax-discourse interface

    Open Access•Diane Lillo-Martin, Ronice Müller De Quadros•Lingua•2011

  • The scope of indefinites

    Open Access•Tania Ionin•Natural Language Semantics•2010

  • The Mind-Context Divide

    Open Access•Joshua Rothman, Jason Rothman et al.•Lingua•2011

  • Scalar implicatures of embedded disjunction

    Open Access•Luka Crnič, Emmanuel Chemla et al.•Natural Language Semantics•2015

  • Born in the USA

    Open Access•Vincenzo Moscati, Jacopo Romoli et al.•Natural Language Semantics•2016

  • The nature of the semantic stimulus

    Open Access•Ezer Rasin, Athulya Aravind•Natural Language Semantics•2021

  • Children interpret disjunction as conjunction

    Open Access•Raj Singh, Ken Wexler et al.•Natural Language Semantics•2016

  • Remarks on the Experimental Turn in the Study of Scalar Implicature, Part I

    Open Access•Emmanuel Chemla, Raj Singh•Language and Linguistics Compass•2014

  • Interface Strategies

    Tanya Reinhart•Interface Strategies•2006

  • Semantic restrictions on children's passives

    Open Access•Michael P Maratsos, M Maratsos•Cognition•1985

  • The kindergarten-path effect

    Open Access•John C Trueswell, I A Sekerina et al.•Cognition•1999

  • The contexts of plausible denial

    Open Access•P C Wason•Journal of Verbal Learning and…•1965

  • Why children and adults sometimes (but not always) compute implicatures

    Maria Teresa Guasti, Gennaro Chierchia et al.•Language and Cognitive Processes•2005

  • Logic and Conversation

    H P Grice•Speech Acts•1975

  • Some facts one simply cannot deny

    Open Access•Jill G De Villiers, Helen B Tager Flusberg•Journal of Child Language•1975

  • Knowledge and Learning in Natural Language

    Open Access•Charles Yang•Encyclopedia of the sciences of…•2012

  • Knowledge and Learning in Natural Language

    Charles D Yang, Charles Yang•Knowledge and learning in natural…•2003

  • Navigating negative quantificational space

    Open Access•Julien Musolino, Stephen Crain et al.•Linguistics•2000

  • A Natural history of negation

    Open Access•Eva Hajičová•Lingua•1990

  • Why children aren't universally successful with quantification

    Open Access•Julien Musolino, Jeffrey Lidz•Linguistics•2006

  • Some knowledge children dont lack

    Open Access•Andrea Gualmini•Linguistics•2004

  • Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation

    Donald Davidson, Donald Herbert Davidson•Inquiries into truth and…•2001

Unique citing works83
Citations per year4,61
Citation span2008 - 2026 (19)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 81

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae