The effect of silent eating during school lunchtime on Covid-19 outbreaks
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4596040 |
|---|---|
| Authors | R Takahashi (0000-0002-8265-8425, Waseda University), Kengo Igei (Keio University Shonan Fujisawa), Yusuke Tsugawa (0000-0002-1937-4833, University of California, Los Angeles, corresponding author), Makiko Nakamuro (0000-0001-8428-8512, Keio University Shonan Fujisawa) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 348 |
| Pages | 116852 |
| Publication date | 2024-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Science & Medicine (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0277-9536 • E-ISSN: 1873-5347 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116852 |
| PMID | 38608485 |
| OpenAlex | W4393859373 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 18 |
Silent eating-no talking during mealtimes-has been used as a measure to reduce the spread of the COVID-19 infection because the emission of droplets during conversations has been considered a risk factor for spreading the virus. Japan implemented silent eating during school lunchtimes in May 2020, and it remained in effect until November 2022. However, concerns have been raised regarding its potential negative effects on children's well-being and educational attainment. More importantly, no study to date has examined its effectiveness in reducing the risk of COVID-19 outbreaks. This study aims to address this important knowledge gap by examining the impact of silent eating on the risk of COVID-19 outbreaks. In November 2022, the Japanese government announced that silent eating in public schools was no longer needed, which resulted in discontinuation of the measure in some schools while other schools maintained it. Taking advantage of this cancelation of the silent eating requirement as a natural experiment, we investigated whether silent eating was associated with a reduced risk of COVID-19 outbreaks. We measured the probability of class closures in public schools (the government's guidelines required class closure when more than one child was infected with COVID-19) by applying a Difference-in-Differences model with two-way fixed effects to panel data. We found no evidence that silent eating was associated with a reduced probability of class closures. Heterogeneity analysis also revealed that our findings did not vary by school characteristics. Our findings indicate that policymakers should be cautious about using silent eating at schools as a potential lever to control outbreaks of infectious diseases
Closure (psychology · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Discontinuation · Environmental health · Government (linguistics · Outbreak · Political science · Psychiatry · Public health · Social distance · Sociology · COVID-19 and Mental Health · COVID-19 epidemiological studies · COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts · Demography · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Social Psychology · Virology
Reshaping Adolescents' Gender Attitudes
Association of Social and Demographic Factors With Covid-19 Incidence and Death Rates in the US
Familiarity Does Not Breed Contempt
Mobility network models of Covid-19 explain inequities and inform reopening
Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects
Lessons from the health policies for children during the pandemic in Japan
Social Media and Mental Health
G Internet and Confidence in Government
Loving lunch in junior high
An Introductory Guide to Event Study Models
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |