Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Experience as knowledge

Disability, distillation and (reprogenetic) decision-making

Bibliographic Data

ID4597157
AuthorsFelicity Boardman (0000-0002-3268-6276, University of Warwick, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume191
Pages186-193
Publication date2017-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Science & Medicine (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0277-9536 • E-ISSN: 1873-5347
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.09.013
PMID28926777
OpenAlexW2753199387
LanguageEN
Citations received21
References cited42

Experiential knowledge' is increasingly recognised as an important influence on reproductive decision-making. 'Experiential knowledge of disability' in particular is a significant resource within prenatal testing/screening contexts, enabling prospective parents to imagine and appraise future lives affected by disability. However, the concept of 'experiential knowledge' has been widely critiqued for its idiosyncrasy, its impermanence and consequently its perceived inferiority to (medical) knowledge. This paper explores some of these key critiques of experiential knowledge through an analysis of its constitution and uses in the context of reproductive decision-making. Seventeen UK-resident women with Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA), or with SMA in their family, took part in two in-depth interviews: one in 2007-9 and the other in 2013-4. By comparing and contrasting these women's accounts at two time points, this paper demonstrates the stark contrast between 'lived experience' of SMA (the visceral everyday realities of life with the condition) and the various way(s) this experience was transformed into, and presented as, 'knowledge' through the processes of making, and accounting, for reproductive decisions. The analysis highlights that multiple, distinct and sometimes competing experiential frameworks are used to conceptualise SMA across time and context. However, rather than evidence of its fallibility, this finding highlights that 'knowledge' is an inappropriate vessel with which to capture and transfer 'experiential knowledge'. Rather, we need to consider how to value such insight in ways that harnesses its inherent strength without leaving it vulnerable to the epistemological critiques attracted by labelling it 'knowledge

Sociology · Children's Rights and Participation · Disability Rights and Representation · Innovative Education and Learning Practices · Medicine · Psychology

  • How should severity be understood in the context of reproductive genetic carrier screening

    Open Access•Lisa Dive, Alison D Archibald et al.•Bioethics•2023

  • Life ‘on high alert’

    Open Access•Jade Howard, Fadhila Mazanderani et al.•Health Risk & Society•2021

  • Turning to Service Users for the Understanding of Current and Future Mental Health Services in the Development Process of Research and Practice

    Open Access•Emmy Nilsson, Carina Tjörnstrand et al.•Health Expectations•2026

  • Do-it-yourself hormones

    Open Access•Natasa Stoli, Klasien Horstman et al.•SSM - Qualitative Research in…•2026

  • Mapping the benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening programmes

    Open Access•Lisa Hinton, Abi Mcniven et al.•SSM - Qualitative Research in…•2026

  • Maternal decision-making through temporal uncertainties

    Open Access•Kelly‐Mae Saville•Social Science & Medicine•2026

  • The Experiential Learning Pathway of Cancer Survivors as They Recover Their Lives Post-Treatment

    Open Access•Karine Bilodeau, Cynthia Henriksen et al.•Global Qualitative Nursing Research•2022

  • The perception of parents with a child with sickle cell disease in Ghana towards prenatal diagnosis

    Open Access•Menford Owusu Ampomah, Karl Atkin et al.•Journal of Community Genetics•2022

  • Imaging Journeys of Recovery and Learning

    Open Access•Brian Casey, Margaret Webb•Qualitative Health Research•2019

  • Defining patient’s experiential knowledge

    Open Access•Arnaud Halloy, Emmanuelle Simon et al.•Sociology of Health & Illness•2023

  • Could Seeking Human Germline Genome Editing Force Journeys of Transnational Care

    Open Access•Amarpreet Kaur•Multidisciplinary Journal of…•2020

  • Babies come when they are ready”

    Open Access•Julie Roberts, Denis Walsh•Feminism & Psychology•2018

  • Expert or experiential knowledge? How knowledge informs situated action in childcare practices

    Open Access•X Tian, Sai Zhang•Social Science & Medicine•2022

  • Ethnography of User Involvement

    Open Access•M L Kessing, Sine Kirkegaard•Qualitative Health Research•2025

  • You Probably Won't Notice Any Symptoms

    Open Access•Lisa Hinton, A Chisholm et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2021

  • Embodied risk for families with Li-Fraumeni syndrome

    Open Access•A Werner-Lin, Rowan Forbes Shepherd et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2022

  • Renegotiation, uncertainty, imagination

    Open Access•Hannah R Davidson, Hannah Davidson et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2024

  • Empathetic knowledge

    Open Access•M L Kessing, Alan Petersen•Health Sociology Review•2025

  • Genetics, emotion and care

    Open Access•Catherine Coveney, Basma Salem•Sociology of Health & Illness•2025

  • Negotiating mental illness across the lay-professional divide

    Open Access•M L Kessing, Nanna Mik‐meyer•Sociology of Health & Illness•2022

  • They don't know themselves, so how can they tell us

    Open Access•Lisa Hinton, N Armstrong•Sociology of Health & Illness•2020

  • Conducting Intensive Interviews Using Email

    Open Access•J L M Mccoyd, Toba Schwaber Kerson•Qualitative Social Work•2006

  • May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert–Lay Knowledge Divide

    Brian Wynne•Risk, Environment and Modernity•1998

  • Pragmatic women and body politics

    Margaret M Lock•Pragmatic women and body politics•1998

  • The Wounded Storyteller

    A W Frank•Wounded Storyteller•1995

  • Experiential knowledge as a resource for coping with uncertainty

    Open Access•Evelyne Baillergeau, Jan Willem Duyvendak•Health Risk & Society•2016

  • Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights

    Laura Purdy•Social Theory and Practice•2001

  • Exploring informed choice in the context of prenatal testing

    Open Access•Beth K Potter, Natasha O’Reilly et al.•Health Expectations•2008

  • Imagined futures

    Open Access•Emma F France, Louise Locock et al.•Health Expectations•2012

  • ‘Balance’ is in the eye of the beholder

    Open Access•Shenaz Ahmed, Louise D Bryant et al.•Health Expectations•2007

  • The role of experiential knowledge within attitudes towards genetic carrier screening

    Open Access•Felicity Boardman, Philip J Young et al.•Health Expectations•2018

  • Evidence-based activism

    Open Access•Vololona Rabeharisoa, Tiago Moreira et al.•BioSocieties•2014

  • In search of experiential knowledge

    Open Access•Stuart Blume•Innovation The European Journal…•2016

  • Test-tube women

    Open Access•Riane Eisler•Futures•1984

  • Refusing Prenatal Diagnosis

    Open Access•Rayna Rapp•Science Technology & Human Values•1998

  • Knowing Patients

    Open Access•J Pols•Science Technology & Human Values•2014

  • The involvement of patients' associations in research

    Open Access•Vololona Rabeharisoa, Michel Callon•International Social Science…•2002

  • Parenting in a crisis

    Open Access•Bridget Young, Mary Dixon-Woods et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2002

  • Negotiating desires and options

    Open Access•Kelly Raspberry, Kelly Amanda Raspberry et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2011

  • The experiential knowledge of patients

    Open Access•J Francisca Caron-Flinterman, Jacqueline E W Broerse et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2005

  • Lay knowledge, social movements and the use of medicines

    Open Access•Nicky Britten, Keith Maguire et al.•Health An Interdisciplinary…•2016

  • Genetic Risk and Reproduction

    Open Access•Evelyn Parsons, Paul Atkinson•The Sociological Review•1993

  • Developing Email Interview Practices in Qualitative Research

    Open Access•E A Burns, Edgar Burns•Sociological Research Online•2010

  • Interrogating the dynamics between power, knowledge and pregnant bodies in amniocentesis decision making

    Open Access•Susan Marken, Carole H Browner et al.•Sociology of Health & Illness•2010

  • Knowledge is power? The role of experiential knowledge in genetically 'risky' reproductive decisions

    Open Access•Felicity Boardman, Felicity K Boardman•Sociology of Health & Illness•2014

  • Belief, knowledge and expertise

    Open Access•L Prior•Sociology of Health & Illness•2003

  • Doing the right thing

    Open Access•Nina Hallowell•Sociology of Health & Illness•1999

  • Genetic risk and the birth of the somatic individual

    Carlos Novas, Nikolas Rose•Economy and Society•2000

Unique citing works21
Citations per year2,63
Citation span2018 - 2026 (9)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 21

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae