Accountability in Three Realms
Making Learning Visible Inside and Outside the Classroom
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4795936 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mara Krechevsky (Zero Emissions Resource Organisation), Melissa Rivard (Zero Emissions Resource Organisation), Fredrick R Burton, Fredrick Burton |
| Year | 2009 |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 64-71 |
| Publication date | 2009-12-31 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Theory Into Practice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0040-5841 • E-ISSN: 1527-2532 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00405840903436087 |
| OpenAlex | W2075557188 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 7 |
This article describes the changing culture of a public school as members of its community explore new ways of being accountable to progressive ideals in an age of skills-based learning and standardized testing. Using documentation makes adult and student learning visible in and outside the classroom, supporting three forms of accountability: (a) accountability to self (looking at what one intended to teach in relation to what actually happened); (b) accountability to each other (contributing to collective learning as well as one's own); and (c) accountability to the larger community (evaluating the relationship between the school's mission and classroom practice). Documentation leads to more intentional and reflective teaching, provides evidence of student learning not represented by standardized tests, and supports the development of a school's identity. The authors conclude that documentation, although not a replacement for standardized tests, is a versatile tool that blurs the line between formative and summative assessment
Accountability · Documentation · Formative assessment · Identity (music · Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Political science · Sociology · Standardized test · Summative assessment · Computer Science · Higher Education Learning Practices · Psychology · Reflective Practices in Education · Student Assessment and Feedback
| Citations per year | 0.31 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2013 - 2018 (6) |
| Highly cited | No |