Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Goal-directed aiming

Two components but multiple processes

Bibliographic Data

ID4845783
AuthorsDigby Elliott (0000-0002-8593-2311, Liverpool John Moores University), Steve Hansen, Lawrence E M Grierson, Lawrence Grierson (0000-0003-0739-5976, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute), James Lyons (0000-0001-8686-8406, McMaster University), Simon J Bennett (0000-0002-8673-0164), Spencer J Hayes (0000-0002-8976-9232)
Year2010
Volume136
Issue6
Pages1023-1044
Publication date2010-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychological Bulletin (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-2909 • E-ISSN: 1939-1455
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1037/a0020958
PMID20822209
OpenAlexW2047237271
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited10

This article reviews the behavioral literature on the control of goal-directed aiming and presents a multiple-process model of limb control. The model builds on recent variants of Woodworth's (1899) two-component model of speed-accuracy relations in voluntary movement and incorporates ideas about dynamic online limb control based on prior expectations about the efferent and afferent consequences of a planned movement. The model considers the relationship between movement speed and accuracy, and how performers adjust their trial-to-trial aiming behavior to find a safe, but fast, zone for movement execution. The model also outlines how the energy and safety costs associated with different movement outcomes contribute to movement planning processes and the control of aiming trajectories. Our theoretical position highlights the importance of advance knowledge about the sensory information that will be available for online control and the need to develop a robust internal representation of expected sensory consequences. We outline how early practice contributes to optimizing strategic planning to avoid worst-case outcomes associated with inherent neural-motor variability. Our model considers the role of both motor development and motor learning in refining feed-forward and online control. The model reconciles procedural and representational accounts of the specificity-of-learning phenomenon. Finally, we examine the breakdown of perceptual-motor precision in several special populations (i.e., Down syndrome, Williams syndrome, autism spectrum disorder, normal aging) within the framework of a multiple-process approach to goal-directed aiming

Cognitive psychology · Component (thermodynamics) · Control (management) · Internal model · Motor Control · Motor Learning · Movement (music) · Perception · Process (computing) · Representation (politics) · Action Observation and Synchronization · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Motor Control and Adaptation · Muscle activation and electromyography studies · Neuroscience · Psychology

  • Navigating mortality

    Open Access•Jia Zhou, Furong Zhou et al.•BMC Psychology•2025

  • The impact of handedness on user performance in touchless input

    Open Access•Pantea Habibi, Debaleena Chattopadhyay•International Journal of…•2021

  • Input device matters for measures of behaviour in online experiments

    Open Access•Matthew Warburton, Carlo Campagnoli et al.•Psychological Research•2025

  • Contribution of Retinal Motion to the Impulse Control of Target-Directed Aiming

    James W Roberts, Lawrence E M Grierson et al.•The American Journal of Psychology•2021

  • Rhythmic auditory stimuli heard before and during a reaching movement elicit performance improvements in both temporal and spatial movement parameters

    Open Access•Carrie M Peters, Cheryl M Glazebrook•Acta Psychologica•2020

  • Susceptibility to the fusion illusion is modulated during both action execution and action observation

    Open Access•Timothy N Welsh, Connor Reid et al.•Acta Psychologica•2020

  • The influence of awareness on implicit visuomotor adaptation

    Open Access•Darrin O Wijeyaratnam, Zacharie Cheng-Boivin et al.•Consciousness and Cognition•2022

  • Measuring motor awareness and metacognition at the start, middle, and end of a reaching movement

    Open Access•Gabriela Oancea, Brian Maniscalco et al.•Consciousness and Cognition•2025

  • Forward Models for Physiological Motor Control

    Open Access•R Chris Miall, Daniel M Wolpert•Neural Networks•1996

  • Executive dysfunction in autism☆

    Open Access•Elisabeth L Hill•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2004

  • Time of Conscious Intention to Act in Relation to Onset of Cerebral Activity (Readiness-Potential)

    Benjamin Libet, CURTIS A GLEASON et al.•Brain•1983

  • When does age-related cognitive decline begin?

    Open Access•Timothy A Salthouse•Neurobiology of Aging•2009

  • The Mirror-Neuron System

    Giacomo Rizzolatti, Laila Craighero•Annual Review of Neuroscience•2004

  • Temporal judgements of internal and external events in persons with and without autism

    Open Access•Cheryl M Glazebrook, Digby Elliott et al.•Consciousness and Cognition•2007

  • Age-Related Kinematic Differences as Influenced by Task Difficulty, Target Size, and Movement Amplitude

    Caroline J Ketcham, Rachael D Seidler et al.•The Journals of Gerontology…•2002

  • How old and young subjects monitor and control responses for accuracy and speed

    Open Access•Patrick Rabbitt•British Journal of Psychology•1979

  • A century later

    Digby Elliott, Werner F Helsen et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2001

  • Movement control in skilled motor performance

    Steven W Keele•Psychological Bulletin•1968

Unique citing works8
Citations per year1,33
Citation span2020 - 2025 (6)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae