Elided Clausal Conjunction Is Not the Only Source of Closest-Conjunct Agreement
A Picture-Matching Study
Bibliographic Data
A recurring hypothesis about the agreement phenomena generalized as closest-conjunct agreement takes this pattern to result from reduced clausal conjunction, simply displaying the agreement of the verb with the nonconjoined subject of the clause whose content survives ellipsis (Aoun, Benmamoun & Sportiche 1994, 1999; see also Wilder 1997). Closest-conjunct agreement is the dominant agreement pattern in the South Slavic languages Slovenian and Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian. A natural question is whether closest-conjunct agreement in these varieties may indeed be analyzed as entirely derived from conjunction reduction. In this article, we report on two experiments conducted to test this. The results reject the hypothesis as far as these languages are concerned, thereby upholding the relevance of models developed to account for closest-conjunct agreement within theories of agreement
Agreement · Bosnian · Conjunction (astronomy · Ellipsis (linguistics · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Physics · Political science · Relevance (law · Serbian · Slavic languages · Verb · Computer Science · Law · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity · Mathematics · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Studying agreement variation in Russian
Agreement with disjoined subjects in German
First conjunct complementiser agreement and the structure of coordination
Locus and timing of gender resolution
Gender agreement mismatch in sandwiched coordination
Conjunction Agreement and the Coordinate Structure Constraint
Furthest conjunct agreement in Jordanian Arabic
Hierarchies, targets, and controllers
Locating agreement in grammar
Closest conjunct agreement is an illusion
Unifying first and last conjunct agreement
Hierarchies, Targets and Controllers
The Grammars of Conjunction Agreement in Slovenian
Further Remarks on First Conjunct Agreement
First Conjunct Agreement
| Citations per year | 1.75 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2025 (4) |
| Highly cited | No |