Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

IRE/F as a Cross-Curricular Collaborative Genre of Implicit Argumentation

Bibliographic Data

ID4896136
AuthorsAnn M Lawrence (University of South Florida), Sandra Crespo (0000-0003-2103-3138)
Year2016
Volume55
Issue4
Pages320-331
Publication date2016-10-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueTheory Into Practice (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0040-5841 • E-ISSN: 1527-2532
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00405841.2016.1209021
OpenAlexW2498788293
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited14

We contend that the classroom-discourse routine of IRE/F (teacher initiation, student response, teacher evaluation/follow-up) is a genre of argumentation that is both collaborative and implicit because teachers and students cooperate during IRE/F exchanges not only to make and mirror knowledge claims but also to suppress justification for those claims. Analyzing consecutive IRE/F exchanges drawn from a first-grade geometry lesson, we propose that the implicit argumentation of IRE/F may conflict with students' learning of justification-centered forms of reasoning that are promoted in the cultural communities of academic disciplines. To highlight the argumentation and identification practices at work in IRE/F exchanges, and to expand teachers' options for responding to students, we offer the flexible heuristic WAIT (Welcome, Analyze, Include, Thank), which transforms the third IRE/F turn into an opportunity for explicitly analyzing students' argumentation practices and including students in disciplinary, school, and classroom communities

Argumentation theory · Argumentative · Discipline · Epistemology · Heuristic · Identification (biology · Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Social science · Sociology · EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Philosophy · Psychology · Writing and Handwriting Education

  • How the Visual Rhetoric of Online Discussions Enables and Constrains Students’ Participation

    Open Access•Michael B Sherry•Journal of Adolescent & Adult…•2017

  • The Uses of Argument

    Open Access•Stephen Toulmin, Stephen Edelston Toulmin•Uses of Argument•2003

  • Reevaluating the IRF sequence

    Open Access•Gordon Wells, Alex Wells•Linguistics and Education•1993

  • When Is Dialogue ‘Dialogic’

    Open Access•Catherine O’Connor, Sarah Michael et al.•Human Development•2007

  • Rethinking diversity

    Kris D Gutiérrez, Patricia Baquedano-López et al.•Mind Culture and Activity•1999

  • When Reading It Wrong Is Getting It Right

    Maren Aukerman, Maren S Aukerman•Research in the Teaching of English•2007

  • Dialogic Teaching and Dialogic Stance

    Maureen P Boyd, William C Markarian•Research in the Teaching of English•2015

  • Indirect Challenges and Provocative Paraphrases

    Michael B Sherry•Research in the Teaching of English•2014

  • Discussion-Based Approaches to Developing Understanding

    Open Access•Arthur N Applebee, Judith A Langer et al.•American Educational Research…•2003

  • What time is it, Denise

    Hugh Mehan•Theory Into Practice•1979

Citations per year0.11
Citation span2017 - 2017 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae