Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Conditional trust

Citizens' council on data-driven media personalisation and public expectations of transparency and accountability

Bibliographic Data

ID5260612
AuthorsYen Nee Wong (0000-0003-1776-5221, University of Kent), Rhia Jones (0000-0002-8749-9953, British Broadcasting Corporation (United Kingdom)), Ranjana Das (0000-0003-0100-1817, University of Surrey, corresponding author), Philip Jackson, Philip J B Jackson (0000-0001-7933-5935, University of Surrey)
Year2023
Volume10
Issue2
Publication date2023-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBig Data & Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2053-9517 • E-ISSN: 2053-9517
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/20539517231184892
OpenAlexW4385989941
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited51

This article presents findings from a rigorous, three-wave series of qualitative research into public expectations of data-driven media technologies, conducted in England, United Kingdom. Through a range of carefully chosen scenarios and deliberations around the risks and benefits afforded by data-driven media personalisation technologies and algorithms, we paid close attention to citizens' voices as our multidisciplinary team sought to engage the public on what 'good' might look like in the context of media personalisation. We paid particular attention to risks and opportunities, examining practical use-cases and scenarios, and our three-wave councils culminated in citizens producing recommendations for practice and policy. In this article, we focus particularly on citizens' ethical assessment, critique and improvements proposed on media personalisation methods in relation to benefits, fairness, safety, transparency and accountability. Our findings demonstrate that public expectations and trust in data-driven technologies are, fundamentally, conditional, with significant emphasis placed on transparency, inclusiveness and accessibility. Our findings also point to the context dependency of public expectations, which appears more pertinent to citizens, in hard political as opposed to entertainment spaces. Our conclusions are significant for global data-driven media personalisation environments - in terms of embedding citizens' focus on transparency and accountability, but equally, also, we argue that strengthening research methodology, innovatively and rigorously to build in citizen voices at the very inception and core of design - must become a priority in technology development

Accountability · Business · Personalization · Political science · Public relations · Social media · Sociology · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection · Social Media and Politics · Marketing

  • Data Practices and Privacy in Gaming

    Open Access•Chunmeizi Su, Andreas Schellewald et al.•Policy & Internet•2025

  • How do we speak about algorithms and algorithmic media futures? Using vignettes and scenarios in a citizen council on data-driven media personalisation

    Open Access•Ranjana Das, Yen Nee Wong et al.•New Media & Society•2024

  • Researching data discomfort

    Open Access•Lisa Reutter•Big Data & Society•2025

  • Algorithmic decision-making

    Open Access•Lauritz Aastrup Munch, Jens Christian Bjerring et al.•Big Data & Society•2024

  • Our data, ourselves

    Open Access•Sagnik Dutta, Suruchi Mazumdar•Big Data & Society•2025

  • Putting Trust to the Test

    Open Access•Andreas Schellewald•Social Media + Society•2025

  • The Implied Audience of Communications Policy Making

    Open Access•Sonia Livingstone, Peter Lunt•The Handbook of Media Audiences•2011

  • ‘The Deal Should Be Fairer!’ Stakeholder Discourses on Intrusive Media Platforms and Interfaces

    Open Access•David Mathieu, Juliane Finger et al.•The Future of Audiences•2018

  • Audiences’ Coping Practices with Intrusive Interfaces

    Open Access•Anne Mollen, Frederik Dhaenens•The Future of Audiences•2018

  • Talk on television

    Sonia Livingstone, Peter Lunt•Talk on television•1994

  • Value Sensitive Design

    Batya Friedman, David G Hendry•Value Sensitive Design•2019

  • If…Then

    Taina Bucher•If... Then•2018

  • Interested in Diversity

    Open Access•Béla Bodó, Natali Helberger et al.•Digital Journalism•2019

  • Algorithmic Accountability

    Nicholas Diakopoulos•Digital Journalism•2015

  • The dark side of technology

    Open Access•Ivan B Dylko, Ivan Dylko et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2017

  • Social media use and participation

    Shelley Boulianne•Information Communication & Society•2015

  • Nothing to hide, nothing to lose? Incentives and disincentives to sharing information with institutions online

    Arthur Marwick, Alice Marwick et al.•Information Communication & Society•2019

  • Networking Democracy

    Brian D Loader, Dan Mercea•Information Communication & Society•2011

  • The algorithmic imaginary

    Taina Bucher•Information Communication & Society•2017

  • To be or not to be algorithm aware

    Open Access•Anne-Britt Gran, Peter Booth et al.•Information Communication & Society•2021

  • Complex ecologies of trust in data practices and data-driven systems

    Open Access•Robin Steedman, Helen Kennedy et al.•Information Communication & Society•2020

  • Rethinking the Focus Group in Media and Communications Research

    Open Access•Peter Lunt, Sonia Livingstone•Journal of Communication•1996

  • Citizens’ juries in planning research priorities

    Open Access•Rachael Gooberman‐hill, Jeremy Horwood et al.•Health Expectations•2008

  • What choices should we be able to make about designer babies? A Citizens’ Jury of young people in South Wales

    Open Access•Rachel Iredale, Marcus Longley et al.•Health Expectations•2006

  • Pandemic influenza communication

    Open Access•William Rogers, Wendy A Rogers et al.•Health Expectations•2009

  • Automated decision‐making

    Open Access•Stine Lomborg, Anne Kaun et al.•Sociology Compass•2023

  • The big data public and its problems

    Open Access•Tauel Harper•New Media & Society•2016

  • The limits of the imaginary

    Open Access•A N Markham•New Media & Society•2020

  • Managing visibility on YouTube through algorithmic gossip

    Open Access•Sophie Bishop•New Media & Society•2019

  • Recommended for you

    Open Access•Blake Hallinan, Ted Striphas•New Media & Society•2014

  • The corporate cultivation of digital resignation

    Open Access•Nora A Draper, Joseph Turow•New Media & Society•2019

  • Digitizing Deliberation

    Nicole M Rishel•Administrative Theory & Praxis•2011

  • Understanding the Effects of Personalization as a Privacy Calculus

    Open Access•Nadine Bol, Tobias Dienlin et al.•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2018

  • Folk theories of algorithmic operations during Internet use

    Leyla Dogruel•The Information Society•2021

  • Decoding algorithms

    Open Access•Stine Lomborg, Patrick Heiberg Kapsch•Media Culture & Society•2020

  • Folk theories of algorithms

    Open Access•Brita Ytre-Arne, Hallvard Moe•Media Culture & Society•2021

  • Representing Citizens and Consumers in Media and Communications Regulation

    Open Access•Sonia Livingstone, Peter Lunt•The Annals of the American…•2007

  • Provocative Screens

    Open Access•Ranjana Das, Anne Graefer•Provocative Screens•2017

  • An Agenda in the Interest of Audiences

    Open Access•Brita Ytre-Arne, Ranjana Das•Television & New Media•2018

  • Audiences’ Communicative Agency in a Datafied Age

    Open Access•Brita Ytre-Arne, Ranjana Das•Communication Theory•2020

  • Audiences in an Age of Datafication

    Open Access•Sonia Livingstone•Television & New Media•2018

  • Critical data studies

    Open Access•Andrew Iliadis, F Russo•Big Data & Society•2016

  • Known or knowing publics? Social media data mining and the question of public agency

    Open Access•Helen Kennedy, Giles Mo•Big Data & Society•2015

  • Sharing precision medicine data with private industry

    Open Access•Angela Ballantyne, Tamra Lysaght et al.•Big Data & Society•2022

  • Examining the role of context in the implementation of a deliberative public participation experiment

    Open Access•Julia Abelson, Pierre-Gerlier Forest et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2007

  • Deliberations about deliberative methods

    Open Access•Julia Abelson, Pierre-Gerlier Forest et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2003

  • Digital Media Use

    Open Access•Yate, Simeon Yate et al.•Sociological Research Online•2015

  • Captivating algorithms

    Open Access•N Seaver•Journal of Material Culture•2019

  • The Feeling of Numbers

    Open Access•Helen Kennedy, R L Hill•Sociology•2018

Unique citing works6
Citations per year3
Citation span2024 - 2025 (2)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae