Conditional trust
Citizens' council on data-driven media personalisation and public expectations of transparency and accountability
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5260612 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yen Nee Wong (0000-0003-1776-5221, University of Kent), Rhia Jones (0000-0002-8749-9953, British Broadcasting Corporation (United Kingdom)), Ranjana Das (0000-0003-0100-1817, University of Surrey, corresponding author), Philip Jackson, Philip J B Jackson (0000-0001-7933-5935, University of Surrey) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2023-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Big Data & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2053-9517 • E-ISSN: 2053-9517 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/20539517231184892 |
| OpenAlex | W4385989941 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 51 |
This article presents findings from a rigorous, three-wave series of qualitative research into public expectations of data-driven media technologies, conducted in England, United Kingdom. Through a range of carefully chosen scenarios and deliberations around the risks and benefits afforded by data-driven media personalisation technologies and algorithms, we paid close attention to citizens' voices as our multidisciplinary team sought to engage the public on what 'good' might look like in the context of media personalisation. We paid particular attention to risks and opportunities, examining practical use-cases and scenarios, and our three-wave councils culminated in citizens producing recommendations for practice and policy. In this article, we focus particularly on citizens' ethical assessment, critique and improvements proposed on media personalisation methods in relation to benefits, fairness, safety, transparency and accountability. Our findings demonstrate that public expectations and trust in data-driven technologies are, fundamentally, conditional, with significant emphasis placed on transparency, inclusiveness and accessibility. Our findings also point to the context dependency of public expectations, which appears more pertinent to citizens, in hard political as opposed to entertainment spaces. Our conclusions are significant for global data-driven media personalisation environments - in terms of embedding citizens' focus on transparency and accountability, but equally, also, we argue that strengthening research methodology, innovatively and rigorously to build in citizen voices at the very inception and core of design - must become a priority in technology development
Accountability · Business · Personalization · Political science · Public relations · Social media · Sociology · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection · Social Media and Politics · Marketing
The Implied Audience of Communications Policy Making
‘The Deal Should Be Fairer!’ Stakeholder Discourses on Intrusive Media Platforms and Interfaces
Audiences’ Coping Practices with Intrusive Interfaces
Talk on television
Value Sensitive Design
If…Then
Interested in Diversity
Algorithmic Accountability
The dark side of technology
Social media use and participation
Nothing to hide, nothing to lose? Incentives and disincentives to sharing information with institutions online
Networking Democracy
The algorithmic imaginary
To be or not to be algorithm aware
Complex ecologies of trust in data practices and data-driven systems
Rethinking the Focus Group in Media and Communications Research
Citizens’ juries in planning research priorities
What choices should we be able to make about designer babies? A Citizens’ Jury of young people in South Wales
Pandemic influenza communication
Automated decision‐making
The big data public and its problems
The limits of the imaginary
Managing visibility on YouTube through algorithmic gossip
Recommended for you
The corporate cultivation of digital resignation
Digitizing Deliberation
Understanding the Effects of Personalization as a Privacy Calculus
Folk theories of algorithmic operations during Internet use
Decoding algorithms
Folk theories of algorithms
Representing Citizens and Consumers in Media and Communications Regulation
Provocative Screens
An Agenda in the Interest of Audiences
Audiences’ Communicative Agency in a Datafied Age
Audiences in an Age of Datafication
Critical data studies
Known or knowing publics? Social media data mining and the question of public agency
Sharing precision medicine data with private industry
Examining the role of context in the implementation of a deliberative public participation experiment
Deliberations about deliberative methods
Digital Media Use
Captivating algorithms
The Feeling of Numbers
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |