Talent Identification and Relative Age Effects in English Male Rugby Union Pathways
From Entry to Expertise
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5285211 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Adam L Kelly (0000-0003-4929-1067), Kevin Till (0000-0002-9686-0536), Daniel T Jackson (0000-0003-2253-7880), Daniel Jackson (0000-0002-8833-9476), Donald Barrell (0000-0001-9174-1418), Kate Burke, Jennifer Turnnidge (0000-0001-5055-9361) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Pages | 640607-640607 |
| Publication date | 2021-02-19 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Sports and Active Living (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2624-9367 • E-ISSN: 2624-9367 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fspor.2021.640607 |
| PMID | 33681762 |
| OpenAlex | W3131182687 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 49 |
A common practice in youth rugby union is to group players based on (bi)annual age with fixed cut-off dates. The overrepresentation of players born at the start of the cut-off date and the underrepresentation of players born toward the end of the cut-off date are termed relative age effects (RAEs). The aim of this study was to examine RAEs during entry into professional and international rugby union pathways in England, as well as comparing them to their respective senior cohort: U15 Regional Academy Player (n = 1,114) vs. Senior Professional Player (n = 281) and U16-23 England Academy Player (n = 849) vs. Senior International Player (n = 48). Chi-square (χ2) analysis compared birth quarter (BQ) distributions against expected distributions. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals compared the likelihood of a BQ being selected. Findings revealed a significant overrepresentation of relatively older players compared with their relatively younger peers within both youth cohorts (P < 0.001; BQ1 = 42.5% vs. BQ4 = 9.6%; BQ1 = 36.5% vs. BQ4 = 15.2%). In comparison, there was no significant difference in the BQ distributions within both senior cohorts. Further, BQ4s were 3.86 and 3.9 times more likely to achieve senior professional and international levels than BQ1s and BQ2s, respectively. It is suggested that relatively younger players may have a greater likelihood of achieving expertise following entry into a rugby union talent pathway due to benefitting from more competitive play against relatively older counterparts during their development (e.g., reversal effects; the underdog hypothesis). Moreover, possible solutions (e.g., age and anthropometric banding; playing-up and playing-down) are discussed to encourage practitioners and policy makers to create the most appropriate learning environment for every player
Football · Geography · Odds · Odds ratio · Quarter (Canadian coin · Sociology · Medicine · Psychology · Sport Psychology and Performance · Sports injuries and prevention · Sports Performance and Training · Demography · Internal Medicine
Relative age effect and development pathways in French basketball
Relative age effects in Rugby union and Rugby league
The Influence of Contextual Factors on the Relative Age Effect in Male International Rugby Union
Exploring the existence, strength, and independence of relative age and maturation selection biases
Structural and developmental characteristics of Japanese elite athletes
Talent Identification in an English Premiership Rugby Union Academy
Talent identification and development in an English Premiership rugby union club
Bio-banding in Sport
The Chi-square test of independence
Annual Age-Grouping and Athlete Development
Unequal Competition as an Impediment to Personal Development
Bio-banding in academy football
The rise of the underdog? The relative age effect reversal among Canadian-born NHL hockey players
"Birthday-Banding" as a Strategy to Moderate the Relative Age Effect
Appreciating Factors Beyond the Physical in Talent Identification and Development
Relative Age Effect and chi-squared statistics
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,4 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |