Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Effects of Different Types of Progress Indicators on Drop-Out Rates in Web Surveys

Bibliographic Data

ID5338626
AuthorsU Matzat (0000-0003-3228-7512, Eindhoven University of Technology, corresponding author), Chris Snijders (0000-0001-6165-7645, Eindhoven University of Technology), Wouter Van Der Horst
Year2009
Volume40
Issue1
Pages43-52
Publication date2009-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1864-9335 • E-ISSN: 2151-2590
PublisherHogrefe Publishing Group (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1027/1864-9335.40.1.43
OpenAlexW2099548776
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited10

The present study analyzes whether and how different types of progress indicators affect the tendency of respondents to continue filling out a web survey, focusing on whether the progress indicators effects depend on the position of the respondent in the questionnaire. Using a sample of 2460 respondents of a Dutch online access panel, we analyze three kinds of progress indicators (linear, fast-then-slow, slow-then-fast, and a control condition) using survival analysis. The results show that the effect of the indicators on the completion rate is either negative or nonexistent, depending on the questionnaire length. Moreover, the effect of an indicator does not depend on the position of the respondent in the answering process. We interpret our findings in terms of the implicit narrative between survey designer and respondent

Demographic economics · Drop out · Econometrics · Economics · Political science · Respondent · Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse

  • Using individually adapted progress indicator in web surveys

    Marko Maliković, Marko Tončić•International Journal of Social…•2021

  • Where Am I? A Meta-Analysis of Experiments on the Effects of Progress Indicators for Web Surveys

    Open Access•Ana Villar, Mario Callegaro et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2013

  • Does the online collection of ego-centered network data reduce data quality? An experimental comparison

    Open Access•U Matzat, Chris Snijders•Social Networks•2010

  • The Psychology of Survey Response

    Open Access•Roger Tourangeau, Lance J Rips et al.•Psychology of Survey Response•2000

  • Mail and Internet Surveys

    Peter M Chisnall•Journal of Advertising Research•2007

  • Access to occupations through social ties

    Open Access•Nan Lin, Mary Y Dumin et al.•Social Networks•1986

  • Classifying Response Behaviors in Web-based Surveys

    Open Access•Michael Bosnjak, Tracy L Tuten•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2006

  • Usability Evaluation of Computer-Assisted Survey Instruments

    Open Access•Mick P Couper•Social Science Computer Review•2000

  • Web Surveys

    Open Access•Scott Crawford, Scott D Crawford et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2001

  • Web Survey Design and Administration

    Mick P Couper, Michael W Traugott et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2001

  • Cognition and Communication

    Norbert Schwarz•Cognition and Communication•2014

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,19
Citation span2010 - 2021 (12)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae