Web Survey Design and Administration
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6367667 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mick P Couper (0000-0001-5006-9346), Michael W Traugott (0000-0002-4263-105X), Mark J Lamias |
| Year | 2001 |
| Volume | 65 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 230-253 |
| Publication date | 2001-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Public Opinion Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-362X • E-ISSN: 1537-5331 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1086/322199 |
| PMID | 11420757 |
| OpenAlex | W2014542527 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 135 |
| References cited | 6 |
Many claims are being made about the advantages of conducting surveys on the Web. However, there has been little research on the effects of format or design on the levels of unit and item response or on data quality. In a study conducted at the University of Michigan, a number of experiments were added to a survey of the student population to assess the impact of design features on resulting data quality. A sample of 1,602 students was sent an e-mail invitation to participate in a Web survey on attitudes toward affirmative action. Three experiments on design approaches were added to the survey application. One experiment varied whether respondents were reminded of their progress through the instrument. In a second experiment, one version presented several related items on one screen, while the other version presented one question per screen. In a third experiment, for one series of questions a random half of the sample clicked radio buttons to indicate their answers, while the other half entered a numeric response in a box. This article discusses the overall implementation and outcome of the survey, and it describes the results of the imbedded design experiments
Administration (probate law · Political science · Survey research · Web application · Web survey · World Wide Web · Applied Psychology · Computer Science · Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods · Law · Psychology · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Exploring expectations of Iranian audiences in terms of consecutive interpreting
Network Data Collected via the Web
The Impact of Mass Media on Political Support
Optimal experience of flow enhanced by telepresence
The validity of self‐reports of alcohol consumption
Factors affecting response rates of the web survey
Estigma social y adopción internacional en España. ¿Es la familia adoptiva un modelo familiar menos «auténtico» que los basados en lazos biológicos
Evaluation of the Q Method as a Public Engagement Tool in Examining the Preferences of Residents in Metal Mining Areas
Crowdsourcing without Data Bias
Normaliser l’hétérosexualité
Mobile vs. PC
Effects of travel vloggers’ attributes on tourists’ intention
Measuring stakeholder preferences for ecosystem services interacting with salmon aquaculture in Tasmania under expansion
Physics curriculum in upper secondary schools
Mapping the Unmapped
Depressive symptoms and loneliness among early adolescents
Marital closeness, autonomy, mastery, and depressive symptoms in a U.S. Internet sample
A Study on Technical and Cultural Differences in Survey Methodology Between Japan and the United States
Stop avoiding the inevitable
Context effects in Internet surveys
Social and Behavioral Research and the Internet
Using Social Media Networks to Conduct Questionnaire Based Research in Social Studies Case Study
Designing Effective Web Surveys
Conducting Online Surveys
Promoting Destinations via Film Tourism
Non-response in student surveys
Combining web and face-to-face in travel surveys
Reliability and validity of egocentered network data collected via web
Rushing to the end
Las encuestas autoadministradas por Internet. Un estudio de caso
Beyond Bullying, Aggression, Discrimination, and Social Safety
Undergraduate student drinking and related harms at an Australian university
Comparing Internet-Based and Venue-Based Methods to Sample MSM in the San Francisco Bay Area
Prevalence and Profiling
Using Web Surveys in Early Front-End Evaluations with Open Populations
Web-Based Surveys
Test–retest reliability of the EQ-5D-5L and the reworded Qolibri-OS in the general population of Italy, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom
The Potential of Electronic Communication and Information Technologies as Research Tools
The Effects of Grids on Web Surveys Completed with Mobile Devices
Persistence and Attrition among Participants in a Multi-Page Online Survey Recruited via Reddit’s Social Media Network
The influence of online quizzes on the acquisition of public affairs knowledge
Intra‐European Student Mobility and European Identity
Online Election Surveys
When near means related
The quality of responses to grid questions as used in Web questionnaires (compared with paper questionnaires)
The impact of respondent attentiveness on reliability and validity
The effect of format and device on the performance and usability of web-based questionnaires
Using individually adapted progress indicator in web surveys
Explaining the intention to participate in a web survey
Is a Web Survey as Effective as a Mail Survey? A Field Experiment Among Computer Users
Design of Web Survey Questionnaires
Privates, pee-pees, and coochies
Promoting Development in Weak Institutional Environments
Mode Differences Between Face-to-Face and Web Surveys
Should I Stay or Should I go
Asking for Numbers and Quantities
Comparing Grids With Vertical and Horizontal Item-by-Item Formats for PCs and Smartphones
The Design of Grids in Web Surveys
Matching the Message to the Medium
Comparing Survey Results Obtained via Mobile Devices and Computers
E-Mail Contacts
E-mail Subject Lines and Their Effect on Web Survey Viewing and Response
Sliders for the Smart
Using Questionnaire Design to Fight Nonresponse Bias in Web Surveys
Differences in the Visual Design Language of Paper-and-Pencil Surveys Versus Web Surveys
Straightlining
An Evaluation of the Effect of Response Formats on Data Quality in Web Surveys
Grid and Item-by-Item Formats in PC and Mobile Web Surveys
Usability Evaluation of Computer-Assisted Survey Instruments
Item-by-item Versus Matrix Questions
Web Surveys
How You Ask Counts
Words, Numbers, and Visual Heuristics in Web Surveys
Alternative Layouts for Grid Questions in PC and Mobile Web Surveys
Where Am I? A Meta-Analysis of Experiments on the Effects of Progress Indicators for Web Surveys
A Typology of Real-Time Validations in Web-Based Surveys
A Web Experiment Showing Negative Effects of Slider Scales Compared to Visual Analogue Scales and Radio Button Scales
Drop Downs and Scroll Mice
Instrument Effects of Images in Web Surveys
Effective Sampling From Social Media Sites and Search Engines for Web Surveys
Displaying Videos in Web Surveys
The Influence of Topic Interest and Interactive Probing on Responses to Open-Ended Questions in Web Surveys
Experiments in Mobile Web Survey Design
Measuring Hate
What Is the Best Size for Matrix-Style Questions in Online Surveys
What They See Is What We Get
Jeunes, génération numérique et sondage en ligne - L'exemple de deux enquêtes conduites auprès de jeunes québécois
Smileys, Stars, Hearts, Buttons, Tiles or Grids
Impacts of privatization
Gender Differences in the ABC’s of the Birds and the Bees
Response Quality in Nonprobability and Probability-based Online Panels
Recodificación de escalas en investigaciones sociológicas
Surveying Colorado Band Directors’ Opinions of Skills and Characteristics Important to Successful Music Teaching
A comparison of data collection methods
Designing Passwords for Web Survey Access
Clicking vs. Dragging
Psychological Research Online
Comparing Response Rates from Web and Mail Surveys
What Crowdsourcing Can Offer to Cross-Cultural Psychological Science
National Jewish population survey 2000–01
Using E-mail To Survey Internet Users In The United States
Usability Evaluation of Computer-Assisted Survey Instruments
Development of a Standard E-Mail Methodology
Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Part-Whole Question Sequences
Effects of Questionnaire Design on the Quality of Survey Data
Effects of Grouping Related Questions in Questionnaires
| Unique citing works | 135 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 5,19 |
| Citation span | 2000 - 2026 (27) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | Yes |
| Citation types | Neutral: 134 |