Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The quality of responses to grid questions as used in Web questionnaires (compared with paper questionnaires)

Bibliographic Data

ID12595367
AuthorsVidal Díaz De Rada (0000-0002-9638-3741, Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), corresponding author), Juan Antonio Chávez Domínguez, Juan Antonio Domínguez
Year2014
Volume18
Issue4
Pages337-348
Publication date2014-03-17
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Social Research Methodology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1364-5579 • E-ISSN: 1464-5300
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13645579.2014.895289
OpenAlexW2016854712
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited36

This paper analyses the quality of information collected by a self-administered survey responded to by a general population, who were offered the possibility of answering using the post or Internet. The analysis will be focused on the use of three grid questions with using rating scales with 6, 6 and 8 items, respectively. There was a polar point labelled scale (0–10) with verbal labels only at the endpoints. The postal survey showed greater acquiescence, a greater choice of extreme response categories and ‘easy’ answers, and a greater number of incomplete questions

Acquiescence · Developmental psychology · Geography · Point (geometry · Population · Quality (philosophy · Rating scale · Repertory grid · Scale (ratio · Sociology · The Internet · World Wide Web · Applied Psychology · Computer Science · Demography · Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods · Healthcare Systems and Technology · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Psychology · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse

  • Mode effects in cultural domain analysis

    Clarence C Gravlee, Chad R Maxwell et al.•International Journal of Social…•2017

  • The Effects of Grids on Web Surveys Completed with Mobile Devices

    Open Access•Michael Stern, David Sterrett et al.•Social Currents•2016

  • Investigating recruitment and completion mode biases in online and door to door electronic surveys

    Nadine Dodge, Ralph Chapman•International Journal of Social…•2017

  • The Logic and Psychology of Constructing Questionnaires

    Don A Dillman•International Handbook of Survey…•2015

  • Mail Surveys

    Thomas W Mangione, Thomas Mangione•Mail Surveys•1995

  • The Psychology of Survey Response

    Open Access•Roger Tourangeau, Lance J Rips et al.•Psychology of Survey Response•2000

  • Designing Effective Web Surveys

    Open Access•Mick P Couper, Mick Couper•Designing Effective Web Surveys•2008

  • Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys

    Open Access•Jon A Krosnick•Applied Cognitive Psychology•1991

  • International Handbook of Survey Methodology

    Joop J Hox, Don A Dillman et al.•International Handbook of Survey…•2012

  • Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys

    Open Access•Angela Payne Wetzel•Journal of Continuing Education…•2010

  • Item non‐response rates

    Martyn Denscombe•International Journal of Social…•2008

  • Mode Differences Between Face-to-Face and Web Surveys

    Dirk Heerwegh•International Journal of Public…•2009

  • Web-Based Questionnaires and the Mode Effect

    Open Access•Martyn Denscombe•Social Science Computer Review•2006

  • Color, Labels, and Interpretive Heuristics for Response Scales

    Roger Tourangeau, Mick P Couper et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2007

  • The Influence of Graphical and Symbolic Language Manipulations on Responses to Self-Administered Questions

    L M Christian, Christian Lovis et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2004

  • The Impact of “No Opinion” Response Options on Data Quality

    Jon A Krosnick, Allyson L Holbrook et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2001

  • National Surveys Via Rdd Telephone Interviewing Versus the Internet

    Linchiat Chang, Jon A Krosnick•Public Opinion Quarterly•2009

  • Response Order Effects in Dichotomous Categorical Questions Presented Orally

    Allyson L Holbrook, Jon A Krosnick et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2007

  • Telephone versus Face-to-Face Interviewing of National Probability Samples with Long Questionnaires

    Allyson L Holbrook, Melanie C Green et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2003

  • Spacing, Position, and Order

    Roger Tourangeau•Public Opinion Quarterly•2004

  • The Measurement of Personal Values in Survey Research

    John A Mccarty, L J Shrum•Public Opinion Quarterly•2000

  • Picture This

    Mick P Couper, Roger Tourangeau et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2004

  • Visual Context Effects in Web Surveys

    Mick P Couper, Frederick G Conrad et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2007

  • Social Desirability Bias in Cati, IVR, and Web Surveys

    Frauke Kreuter, Stanley Presser et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2008

  • Comparing Oral Interviewing with Self-Administered Computerized QuestionnairesAn Experiment

    Liu Chang, Jon A Krosnick•Public Opinion Quarterly•2010

  • The Future of Modes of Data Collection

    Mick P Couper•Public Opinion Quarterly•2011

  • An Experimental Comparison of Web and Telephone Surveys

    Fricker, Scott Fricker•Public Opinion Quarterly•2005

  • Web Survey Design and Administration

    Mick P Couper, Michael W Traugott et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2001

  • Survey Research

    Jon A Krosnick•Annual Review of Psychology•1999

  • Design of Web Questionnaires

    Open Access•Vera Toepoel, Marcel Das et al.•CAM•2009

  • The Reliability of Survey Attitude Measurement

    Open Access•Duane F Alwin, Jon A Krosnick•Sociological Methods & Research•1991

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,3
Citation span2016 - 2017 (2)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae