What's Recalled Depends on the Nature of the Recall Procedure
The Case of Mnemic Neglect
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5339010 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Leonard S Newman (0000-0001-9385-4707, Syracuse University), Maxwell S Sapolsky (Syracuse University), Ying Tang (0000-0002-1745-3685, Syracuse University), Daria A Bakina (Syracuse University) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 93-102 |
| Publication date | 2014-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1864-9335 • E-ISSN: 2151-2590 |
| Publisher | Hogrefe Publishing Group (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1027/1864-9335/a000164 |
| OpenAlex | W1822351102 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 36 |
According to the mnemic neglect model, people process non-threatening feedback more deeply than threatening feedback. Tests of the model rely on behavior recall as the primary dependent variable. Similar to other research programs in social psychology, little attention has been paid to determining the optimal recall procedure for testing the model and replicating its predicted findings. Four experiments reveal that the results of mnemic neglect studies are significantly affected by recall period length and how recalled behaviors are reported. A few basic principles (e.g., output interference, output primacy as an index of accessibility) can account for these findings. The lessons learned apply not just to mnemic neglect research, but to any investigation of social-cognitive processes utilizing free recall measures
Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Developmental psychology · Free recall · Neglect · Recall · Recall test · Deception detection and forensic psychology · Memory Processes and Influences · Policing Practices and Perceptions · Psychology · Social Psychology
Methods of Research In Social Psychology (Cram101 Textbook Outlines - Textbook NOT Included)
Search of associative memory.
Person memory
Person memory and judgment.
Scientific Utopia
Retrieval Selectivity in the Processing of Self-referent Information
Memory for expectancy-congruent and expectancy-incongruent information
Mnemic neglect is not an artifact of expectancy
Mnemic neglect and self-threat
Individual construct accessibility, person memory, and the recall-judgment link
Illusory correlation in the perception of groups
Illusory correlation in interpersonal perception
Forgotten but not gone
The reality of repressed memories
The formation of stereotypic beliefs
The need to evaluate
Person memory
Exhaustive and heuristic retrieval processes in person cognition
How automatic are social judgments
Effects of instructions to disregard information on its subsequent recall and use in making judgments
Individual differences in social categorization
Resolving the apparent discrepancy between the incongruency effect and the expectancy-based illusory correlation effect
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,45 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2025 (11) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |