Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Discretion and military frontline workers

Investigating civil-military relations policies in Afghanistan

Bibliographic Data

ID5724302
AuthorsLene Ekhaugen (Norwegian Institute for Defence Studies (IFS), Norwegian Defence University College, Oslo, Norway, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume32
Issue8
Pages1394-1417
Publication date2021-11-17
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSmall Wars and Insurgencies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0959-2318 • E-ISSN: 1743-9558
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09592318.2021.1980185
OpenAlexW3200988942
LanguageEN
References cited17

This article explores how military ‘frontline workers’ use their discretion to interpret and then comply, breach or bypass policies that reach into the tactical level, and why. Based on extensive primary sources including in-depth interviews, end-of-tour reports and data from records, the case study explores the implementation of policies on civil-military relations by military commanders in the Norwegian-led Provincial Reconstruction Team (PRT) in Afghanistan in 2005–2012. This article finds that the commanders used their considerable discretion to implement policies that parted from national directives. In doing so, the Norwegian military strove to align their approach with close allies and NATO and became actual policy-makers. This article contributes to the debate on how western militaries behave at the tactical level by employing the concept of ‘discretion’

Civil–military relations · Discretion · Military justice · Norwegian · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Gender, Security, and Conflict · Law · Military History and Strategy · Peacebuilding and International Security · Public Administration

  • Understanding street-level bureaucracy

    Open Access•Peter Hupe, Michael Hill et al.•Understanding Street-Level…•2015

  • Street-Level Bureaucracy

    Michael Lipsky•Michigan Law Review•1981

  • Military Cultures in Peace and Stability Operations

    Chiara Ruffa•Military Cultures in Peace and…•2018

  • Divided We Stand

    Conor Keane, Glenn Diesen•International Peacekeeping•2015

  • A Clash of Mindsets? An Insider's Account of Provincial Reconstruction Teams

    Touko Piiparinen•International Peacekeeping•2007

  • Empire Lite Revisited

    M J Williams, Marc Williams•International Peacekeeping•2011

  • Bureaucracy Does Its Thing

    Todd Greentree•Journal of Strategic Studies•2013

  • On Frontline Workers as Bureau-Political Actors

    Open Access•Jori Pascal Kalkman, Peter Groenewegen•Administration & Society•2019

  • Revisiting Lipsky

    Open Access•Catherine Durose•Political Studies•2011

  • Mind the Gap

    Anat Gofen•Journal of Public Administration…•2014

  • Learning from Afghanistan

    Sebastiaan Rietjen, Joseph Soeters et al.•Small Wars and Insurgencies•2013

  • Comprehensive approaches, diverse coherences

    J van der Lijn•Small Wars and Insurgencies•2015

  • Soldiers drawn into politics? The influence of tactics in civil-military relations

    Chiara Ruffa, Christopher Dandeker et al.•Small Wars and Insurgencies•2013

  • Bureaucratic Politics, Role Conflict, and the Internal Dynamics of US Provincial Reconstruction Teams in Afghanistan

    Open Access•Conor Keane, Steve Wood•Armed Forces & Society•2016

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae