Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Automated Discourse Analysis Techniques and Implications for Writing Assessment

Bibliographic Data

ID5900930
AuthorsTrisevgeni Liontou (0000-0003-1810-0598, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume8
Issue1
Pages3
Publication date2022-12-21
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLanguages (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2226-471X • E-ISSN: 2226-471X
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/languages8010003
OpenAlexW4313209350
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited81

Analysing writing development as a function of foreign language competence is important in secondary school children because the developmental patterns are strongest at a young age when successful interventions are needed. Although a number of researchers have explored the degree to which specific textual characteristics in EFL students' essays are associated with high and low ratings by teachers, the extent to which such characteristics are associated with rater-mediated assessment under standard exam conditions remains relatively unexplored. Motivated by the above void in pertinent literature, the overall aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between specific discourse features present in the writing scripts of EFL learners sitting for the British Council's APTIS for TEENS exam and the assigned scores during operational scoring by specially trained raters. A total of 800 international EFL students aged 13 to 15 years old took part in the study, and 800 scored written essays on the same task prompt of the pertinent test produced under standard exam conditions were analysed. The results showed statistically significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between the linguistic features identified in the essays produced by young EFL learners at different levels of language competence. The main text features that were repeatedly found to make a significant contribution to distinguishing scores assigned to texts both within and across levels were word frequency, word abstractness, lexical diversity, lexical and semantic overlap, all of which could be used to obtain a numerical cut-off point between proficiency levels. These findings support the notion that progress in L2 writing is primarily associated with producing more elaborate texts with more sophisticated words, more complex sentence structure and fewer cohesive features as a function of increased language competence. The findings of the study could provide practical guidance to EFL teachers, material developers and test designers as to the kind of linguistic strategies young EFL learners develop as a function of their level of language competence and suggestions to consider when designing EFL classroom curricula, writing skills textbooks and exam papers on written production

Competence (human resources · Lexical Diversity · Linguistics · Mathematics education · Scripting language · Vocabulary · Computer Science · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Psychology · Second Language Acquisition and Learning · Social Psychology · Writing and Handwriting Education

  • O „subtelnościach” metod oceny wydźwięku wypowiedzi pisanych. Porównanie trzech podejść w analizie sentymentu

    Open Access•Krzysztof Tomanek•Przeglad Socjologii Jakosciowej•2024

  • Psychology of Reading

    Keith Rayner, Alexander Pollatsek et al.•Psychology of Reading•2012

  • Assessing Writing

    Open Access•Sara Cushing Weigle•Assessing Writing•2002

  • Lexical Diversity and Language Development

    Open Access•David Malvern, Brian Richards et al.•Lexical Diversity and Language…•2004

  • Longitudinal relationships of levels of language in writing and between writing and reading in grades 1 to 7.

    Robert D Abbott, Virginia W Berninger et al.•Journal of Educational Psychology•2010

  • Syntactic and lexical development in an intensive English for Academic Purposes programme

    Open Access•Diana Mazgutova, Judit Kormos•Journal of Second Language Writing•2015

  • Predicting human judgments of essay quality in both integrated and independent second language writing samples

    Liang Guo, Scott A Crossley et al.•Assessing Writing•2013

  • Different topics, different discourse

    Open Access•WeiWei Yang, Xiaofei Lu et al.•Journal of Second Language Writing•2015

  • Coh-Metrix

    Open Access•Arthur C Graesser, D S Mcnamara et al.•Behavior Research Methods,…•2004

  • The development and use of cohesive devices in L2 writing and their relations to judgments of essay quality

    Open Access•Scott A Crossley, Kristopher Kyle et al.•Journal of Second Language Writing•2016

  • Predicting second language writing proficiency

    Open Access•Scott A Crossley, D S Mcnamara•Journal of Research in Reading•2012

  • MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D

    Open Access•Philip M McCarthy, Scott Jarvi et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2010

  • Linguistic Features of Writing Quality

    Open Access•D S Mcnamara, Scott A Crossley et al.•Written Communication•2010

  • Using Computer-Tagged Linguistic Features to Describe L2 Writing Differences

    Open Access•Leslie Grant, April Ginther•Journal of Second Language Writing•2000

  • Does writing development equal writing quality? A computational investigation of syntactic complexity in L2 learners

    Open Access•Scott A Crossley, D S Mcnamara•Journal of Second Language Writing•2014

  • Syntactic complexity in college-level English writing

    Open Access•Xiaofei Lu, Haiyang Ai•Journal of Second Language Writing•2015

  • How Large a Vocabulary is Needed For Reading and Listening?

    Paul Nation, I Nation•Canadian Modern Language Review/…•2006

  • Conceptualizing and measuring short-term changes in L2 writing complexity

    Open Access•Bram Bulté, Alex Housen•Journal of Second Language Writing•2014

  • Researching Vocabulary Through a Word Knowledge Framework

    Open Access•Norbert Schmitt, Paul Meara•Studies in Second Language…•1997

  • The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension

    Walter Kintsch•Psychological Review•1988

  • Lexical Frequency Profiles

    Paul Meara•Applied Linguistics•2005

  • Vocabulary Size and Use

    Berthold Laufer, Paul Nation•Applied Linguistics•1995

  • Lexical Diversity in Writing and Speaking Task Performances

    Guoxing Yu•Applied Linguistics•2010

  • Syntactic Complexity Measures and their Relationship to L2 Proficiency

    Lourdes Ortega•Applied Linguistics•2003

  • The Child Language Data Exchange System

    Open Access•Brian Macwhinney, Catherine E Snow et al.•Journal of Child Language•1990

  • Functional adequacy in L2 writing

    Open Access•Folkert Kuiken, Ineke Vedder•Language Testing•2017

  • Investigating accommodation in language proficiency interviews using a new measure of lexical diversity

    Open Access•David Malvern, Brian Richards•Language Testing•2002

  • Baddeley's Grammatical Reasoning Test

    Open Access•N Clayton Silver, Glenn R Phelps et al.•Language Testing•1989

  • Predicting lexical proficiency in language learner texts using computational indices

    Open Access•Scott A Crossley, Tom Salsbury et al.•Language Testing•2011

  • An analytic and cognitive parameterization of coherence relations

    Open Access•Max Louwerse•Cognitive Linguistics•2002

  • Onset and expansion of L2 cognitive academic language proficiency in bilingual settings

    Open Access•Francisco Lorenzo, Leticia Rodrı́guez et al.•System•2014

  • Process writing and vocabulary development

    Open Access•James Muncie•System•2002

  • Psycholinguistic word information in second language oral discourse

    Open Access•Tom Salsbury, Scott A Crossley et al.•Second language Research•2011

  • Structure of the second language mental lexicon

    Open Access•Alla Zareva•Second language Research•2007

  • Coh-Metrix

    D S Mcnamara, Max M Louwerse et al.•Discourse Processes•2010

  • Learning from texts

    D S Mcnamara, Walter Kintsch•Discourse Processes•1996

  • Avoiding Obstacles to Student Comprehension of Test Questions

    Michal Kirschner, Carol Wexler et al.•TESOL Quarterly•1992

  • Lexical and Syntactic Features of ESL Writing by Students at Different Levels of L2 Proficiency

    Dana R Ferris•TESOL Quarterly•1994

  • Assessing Text Readability Using Cognitively Based Indices

    Open Access•Scott A Crossley, J C Greenfield et al.•TESOL Quarterly•2008

  • The Role of Conjunctions in L2 Text Comprehension

    Esther Geva•TESOL Quarterly•1992

  • A Corpus‐Based Evaluation of Syntactic Complexity Measures as Indices of College‐Level ESL Writers' Language Development

    Open Access•Xiaofei Lu•TESOL Quarterly•2011

  • Repeated Reading and Reading Fluency in Learning Disabled Children

    Open Access•Carol A Rashotte, Joseph K Torgesen•Reading Research Quarterly•1985

  • Coh-Metrix

    Open Access•Arthur C Graesser, D S Mcnamara et al.•Educational Researcher•2011

  • Psycholinguistic Determinants of Foreign Language Vocabulary Learning

    Open Access•Nick C Ellis, Alan Beaton•Language Learning•1993

  • Effects of First Language on Second Language Writing

    Open Access•Hiroe Kobayashi, Carol Rinnert•Language Learning•1992

  • Measuring L2 Lexical Growth Using Hypernymic Relationships

    Open Access•Scott A Crossley, Scott Crossley et al.•Language Learning•2009

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae