Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Vulnerability of Emerging Sign Languages

(E)merging Sign Languages

Bibliographic Data

ID5901403
AuthorsMarah Jaraisy (0000-0002-7119-9569, University of Birmingham, corresponding author), Rose Stamp (0000-0002-1993-559X, Bar-Ilan University)
Year2022
Volume7
Issue1
Pages49
Publication date2022-02-24
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLanguages (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2226-471X • E-ISSN: 2226-471X
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/languages7010049
OpenAlexW4213422149
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited58

Emerging sign languages offer linguists an opportunity to observe language emergence in real time, far beyond the capabilities of spoken language studies. Sign languages can emerge in different social circumstances-some in larger heterogeneous communities, while others in smaller and more homogeneous communities. Often, examples of the latter, such as Ban Khor Sign Language (in Thailand), Al Sayyid Bedouin Sign Language (in Israel), and Mardin Sign Language (in Turkey), arise in communities with a high incidence of hereditary deafness. Traditionally, these communities were in limited contact with the wider deaf community in the region, and so the local sign language remained relatively uninfluenced by the surrounding signed language(s). Yet, in recent years, changes in education, mobility, and social communication patterns have resulted in increased interaction between sign languages. Rather than undergoing language emergence, these sign languages are now facing a state of "mergence" with the majority sign language used by the wider deaf community. This study focuses on the language contact situation between two sign languages in Kufr Qassem, Israel. In the current situation, third-generation deaf signers in Kufr Qassem are exposed to the local sign language, Kufr Qassem Sign Language (KQSL), and the dominant sign language of the wider Israeli deaf community, Israeli Sign Language (ISL), both of which emerged around 90 years ago. In the current study, we analyzed the signing of twelve deaf sign-bilinguals from Kufr Qassem whilst they engaged in a semi-spontaneous task in three language conditions: (1) with another bilingual signer, (2) with a monolingual KQSL signer, and (3) with a monolingual ISL signer. The results demonstrate that KQSL-ISL sign-bilinguals show a preference for ISL in all conditions, even when paired with a monolingual KQSL signer. We conclude that the degree of language shift in Kufr Qassem is considerable. KQSL may be endangered due to the risk of social and linguistic mergence of the KQSL community with the ISL community in the near future

Language interpretation · Linguistics · Manually coded language · Sign (mathematics · Sign language · Sociolinguistics of sign languages · Computer Science · Hearing Impairment and Communication · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Mathematics · Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism

  • The effects of topic and interlocutor on code-switching patterns in the Kufr Qassem deaf community

    Open Access•Duaa Omar-Hajdawood, Rose Stamp et al.•International Journal of…•2026

  • Word of mouth

    Open Access•Marah Jaraisy, Rose Stamp•Language in Society•2024

  • Gesture

    Erica A Cartmill•Annual Review of Anthropology•2022

  • New Perspectives on Endangered Languages

    José Antonio Flores Farfán, Fernando F Ramallo•New perspectives on endangered…•2010

  • One Speaker, Two Languages

    Open Access•Lesley Milroy, Pieter Muysken•One Speaker, Two Languages•1995

  • Everyone Here Spoke Sign Language

    Nora Ellen Groce, Nora Groce•Everyone Here Spoke Sign Language•1985

  • The emergence of grammar

    Open Access•Wendy Sandler, Irit Meir et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2005

  • Children Creating Core Properties of Language

    Open Access•Ann Senghas, Sachiko Kita et al.•Science•2004

  • Language Contact

    Open Access•Sarah G Thomason•International encyclopedia of the…•2001

  • Categorical data analysis

    Open Access•T Florian Jaeger•Journal of Memory and Language•2008

  • Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items

    Open Access•R Harald Baayen, D J Davidson et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2008

  • The Status of Arabic in Israel

    Open Access•Ilan Saban, Muhammad Amara•Israel Law Review•2002

  • Keeping Languages Alive

    Open Access•M C Jones, Sarah Ogilvie•Keeping Languages Alive•2013

  • Loanwords in the World's Languages

    Jorge Gómez, Willem Adelaar et al.•Loanwords in the World's…•2009

  • Deaf people with “no language”

    Elaine Moriarty, Erin Moriarty Harrelson•Applied Linguistics Review•2019

  • When Parents Are Deaf Versus Hard of Hearing

    Ross E Mitchell•The Journal of Deaf Studies and…•2004

  • Anger, gender, language shift and the politics of revelation in a Papua New Guinean village

    Open Access•D Kulick•Pragmatics Quarterly Publication…•2022

  • Negation in San Juan Quiahije Chatino Sign Language

    Kate Mesh, Lynn Hou•Gesture•2018

  • Dedicated gestures and the emergence of sign language

    Wendy Sandler•Gesture•2012

  • Beyond languages, beyond modalities

    A Kusters, Massimiliano Spotti et al.•International Journal of…•2017

  • Understanding and forecasting Ethnolinguistic Vitality

    Mark E Karan•Journal of Multilingual and…•2011

  • Describe, don't prescribe. The practice and politics of translanguaging in the context of deaf signers

    Open Access•Maartje De Meulder, A Kusters et al.•Journal of Multilingual and…•2019

  • Endangered languages

    Peter K Austin, Julia Sallabank•Journal of Multilingual and…•2013

  • Comparing codeswitching and borrowing

    Carol Myers‐scotton•Journal of Multilingual and…•1992

  • Rating the vitality of sign languages

    J Albert Bickford, M Paul Lewis et al.•Journal of Multilingual and…•2015

  • On the Conventionalization of Mouth Actions in Australian Sign Language

    Open Access•Trevor Johnston, Jane van Roekel et al.•Language and Speech•2016

  • Getting off the GoldVarb Standard

    Open Access•Daniel Ezra Johnson•Language and Linguistics Compass•2009

  • Kata Kolok Color Terms and the Emergence of Lexical Signs in Rural Signing Communities

    Connie De Vos•The Senses and Society•2011

  • Sign to me, not the children

    Open Access•Elaine Moriarty•Language & Communication•2020

  • The tipping point

    Open Access•A Kusters•Language & Communication•2020

  • The emergence of referential shift devices in three young sign languages

    Open Access•Rose Stamp, Wendy Sandler•Lingua•2021

  • The influence of community on language structure

    Irit Meir, Assaf Israel et al.•Linguistic Variation•2012

  • (Almost) everyone here spoke Ban Khor Sign Language-Until they started using TSL

    Open Access•Angela M Nonaka•Language & Communication•2014

  • Globalization, hybridity, and vitality in the linguistic ideologies of New Zealand Sign Language users

    Open Access•Rachel Mckee, David Mckee•Language & Communication•2020

  • Ideologies behind the scoring of factors to rate sign language vitality

    Open Access•Jenny Webster, Josefina Safar•Language & Communication•2020

  • Ideologies of linguistic research on small sign languages in the global South

    Open Access•Ben Braithwaite•Language & Communication•2020

  • Introduction

    Open Access•K Snoddon, Maartje De Meulder•Language & Communication•2020

  • Classifications and typologies

    Open Access•Lynn Hou, Connie De Vos•Journal of Sociolinguistics•2022

  • Sign language endangerment and linguistic diversity

    Open Access•Ben Braithwaite•Language•2019

  • Language vitality

    Open Access•Salikoko S Mufwene•Language•2017

  • Language ideologies in the shared signing community of Adamorobe

    Open Access•A Kusters•Language in Society•2014

  • The forgotten endangered languages

    Angela M Nonaka•Language in Society•2004

  • Deaf Discourse

    Shifra Kisch•Medical Anthropology•2008

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,75
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae