Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Refining collection-unit survey methodology

The Maharal Valley project case study

Bibliographic Data

ID5953633
AuthorsY Jaffe (0000-0002-4114-0910), Dmitry D Vasyukov (0000-0002-9142-2481), Gal Barmatov-Paz (0009-0004-3382-752X), R Shimelmitz (0000-0002-0395-9036), Nurit Shtober‐zisu (0000-0002-5711-2586), Michael Lazar (0000-0002-1415-8840), I Patania (0000-0003-3723-0582), Joel Roskin (0000-0003-3031-9605), Shmuel Bar (0009-0004-6101-5641)
Year2025
Volume17
Issue11
Publication date2025-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueArchaeological and Anthropological Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1866-9557 • E-ISSN: 1866-9565
PublisherSpringer Nature (PUBLISHER • SG)
DOI10.1007/s12520-025-02337-w
OpenAlexW4415757571
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited100

Archaeological field surveys frequently rely on collection unit methodologies to map surface artifact distributions across landscapes. While effective in rapidly covering large areas, these methods face persistent limitations that arise from sampling biases and post-depositional histories. The Maharal Valley Project, Israel, tackles these challenges through an innovative integrative framework that strengthens the analytical capabilities of collection unit field surveys. This includes high-resolution, contiguous collection-unit survey integrated with hexagonal tessellation for post-field data standardization as well as considering multiple parameters that influence artifact collection numbers. These steps enable modeling the effects of visibility conditions to adjust artifact counts for sampling biases towards a more accurate exploration of their distribution across time and space (To this end the article is accompanied by substantial methodological detail in the supplementary materials). We further emphasize the importance of incorporating geoarchaeology as an integral part of the survey and, accordingly, excavated several trenches to assess post-depositional processes, aiming to exclude sediment displacement and support the integrity of surface scatters as proxies for ancient activity. The results are discussed in comparison to former work in the southern Levant, highlighting the importance of landscape exploitation and reveal several distinct patterns from the Middle Paleolithic to the Ottoman-period. This integrative framework enhances the analytical power of surface surveys, providing a replicable model for bridging field data collection and spatial analysis in regional archaeological research

  • Qedesh in Galilee

    Ido Wachtel, Roi Sabar et al.•Bulletin of the American Society…•2026

  • Scratching the Surface at Gath

    Jacques Uziel, Joe Uziel et al.•Tel Aviv•2005

  • Town and Country in the Southern Carmel

    Shimon Gibson, Sean Kingsley et al.•Levant•1999

  • A conceptual model of multi-scale formation processes of open-air Middle Paleolithic sites in the arid Negev desert, Israel

    Open Access•Maya Oron, Joel Roskin et al.•Quaternary Research•2023

  • Sampling in Archaeology

    Open Access•Clive Orton•Sampling in Archaeology•2000

  • Archaeological Survey

    Open Access•Edward B Banning•Archaeological Survey•2002

  • Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis

    Bernard W Silverman•Density Estimation for Statistics…•2018

  • The Siteless Survey

    Open Access•Robert C Dunnell, William S Dancey•Advances in Archaeological Method…•1983

  • Rectangular and hexagonal grids used for observation, experiment and simulation in ecology

    Open Access•Colin P D Birch, Colin Birch et al.•Ecological Modelling•2007

  • BRMS

    Open Access•Paul-Christian Bürkner•Journal of Statistical Software•2017

  • A guide to good practice in Mediterranean surface survey projects

    Open Access•Peter Attema, John Bintliff et al.•JOURNAL OF GREEK ARCHAEOLOGY•2020

  • Refuse Usage and Architectural Reuse in the Field

    Itamar Taxel, Joel Roskin•Journal of Islamic Archaeology•2022

  • Reassessing Surface Artefact Scatters. The Integration of Artefact‐Accurate Fieldwalking with Geophysical Data at Medieval Harbour Sites Near Bruges (Belgium)

    Open Access•Jan Trachet, Samuël Delefortrie et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2017

  • Determining the settlement history of Hellenistic, Roman, and Byzantine sites in the Galilee, Israel

    Uzi Leibner•Journal of Field Archaeology•2014

  • Stone Tools in the Paleolithic and Neolithic Near East

    Open Access•John J Shea•Stone Tools in the Paleolithic…•2013

  • The Political Landscape

    A T Smith•The Political Landscape•2003

  • The Acheulo-Yabrudian of Jamal Cave, Mount Carmel, Israel

    Yossi Zaidner, Dothan Druck et al.•Journal of the Israel Prehistoric…•2005

  • Hongshan households and communities in Neolithic northeastern China

    Open Access•R D Drennan, Christian E Peterson et al.•Journal of Anthropological…•2017

  • Sovereignty, mobility, and political cartographies in Late Bronze Age southern Caucasia

    Open Access•Ian Lindsay, Alan Greene•Journal of Anthropological…•2013

  • Changes in regional settlement patterns and the development of complex societies in southeastern Shandong, China

    Open Access•A P Underhill, G M Feinman et al.•Journal of Anthropological…•2008

  • Archaeological surveys in areas with a high density of artefacts

    Open Access•Ignasi Grau Mira•Quaternary International•2017

  • Chert exploitation and environmental awareness of the prehistoric inhabitants of Nahal Me‘arot Caves, Mount Carmel, Israel

    Open Access•Dotan Druck•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2020

  • Lingjiatan early complex societies and social organization in the Yuxi Valley, China

    Open Access•Wenjing Wang, WU Wei-hong•Archaeological Research in Asia•2021

  • Surface Artifact Scatters, Data Collection, and Significance

    Open Access•Matthew Douglass, Luann Wandsnider et al.•Advances in Archaeological Practice•2023

  • Regression with Archaeological Count Data

    Open Access•B F Codding, Scott Brewer•Advances in Archaeological Practice•2024

  • Simulating Trial Trenches for Archaeological Prospection

    Open Access•Kristof Haneca, Sofie Debruyne et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2016

  • How Does Visibility Count? An Open Data‐Driven Approach to Compare the Use of Ground Visibility in Archaeological Field‐Walking Surveys in the Mediterranean Region

    Open Access•Néhémie Strupler•Archaeological Prospection•2024

  • Survey, Shovel Probes, and Population Estimates

    Open Access•C Adam Berrey, Scott D Palumbo et al.•Journal of Archaeological Method…•2021

  • Quality Assurance in Archaeological Survey

    Open Access•Edward B Banning, Alicia L Hawkins et al.•Journal of Archaeological Method…•2016

  • The Archaeology of Regions

    Open Access•J Kantner•Journal of Archaeological Research•2007

  • Regional Settlement Pattern Studies

    Open Access•A Kowalewski•Journal of Archaeological Research•2008

  • The Hidden Landscape of Prehistoric Greece

    John Bintliff, John L Bintliff et al.•Journal of Mediterranean…•2000

  • Finding Sites in Mediterranean Survey

    Nathan Meyer•Journal of Mediterranean…•2023

  • Siteless Survey and Intensive Data Collection in an Artifact-rich Environment

    William Caraher, William R Caraher et al.•Journal of Mediterranean…•2006

  • Assessing visibility and geomorphological biases in regional field surveys

    Open Access•Anita Casarotto, Tesse D Stek et al.•Geoarchaeology•2017

  • Survey, Shovel Tests and Excavations at Tel 'Eton

    Avraham Faust, Hayah Katz•Tel Aviv•2012

  • Sweep widths and the detection of artifacts in archaeological survey

    Open Access•Edward B Banning, Alicia L Hawkins et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2011

  • Mapping archaeometallurgical data of the Iberian Copper Age

    Open Access•Laura Perucchetti, I Montero-Ruiz et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2020

  • A probabilistic framework for assessing spatio-temporal point patterns in the archaeological record

    Open Access•Enrico R Crema, A Bevan et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2009

  • Predictive modeling for archaeological site locations

    Open Access•Ido Wachtel, Royi Zidon et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2018

  • Our Checkered Past

    Open Access•Phillip O Leckman, Michael Heilen•Advances in Archaeological Practice•2023

  • A Nested Approach to Survey in the Egiin Gol Valley, Mongolia

    William Honeychurch, Joshua Wright et al.•Journal of Field Archaeology•2007

  • Parallel Archaeological and Visibility Survey in the Western Lower Papaloapan Basin, Veracruz, Mexico

    B L Stark, Christopher P Garraty•Journal of Field Archaeology•2008

  • GIS, Archaeological Survey, and Landscape Archaeology on the Island of Kythera, Greece

    A Bevan, James Conolly•Journal of Field Archaeology•2002

  • The Character of Surface Archaeological Deposits and Its Influence on Survey Accuracy

    Luann Wandsnider, Eileen L Camilli•Journal of Field Archaeology•1992

  • Multi-Scale and Nested-Intensity Sampling Techniques for Archaeological Survey

    Oskar Burger, Lawrence C Todd et al.•Journal of Field Archaeology•2004

  • Landscapes of Urbanization and De-Urbanization

    Open Access•A S Green, C A Petrie•Journal of Field Archaeology•2018

  • The Definition of Ancient Manured Zones by Means of Extensive Sherd-Sampling Techniques

    T J Wilkinson•Journal of Field Archaeology•1982

  • Reliability of Archaeological Records on Cultivated Surfaces

    Michael Shott, Michael J Shott•Journal of Field Archaeology•1995

  • Artifact Size and Plowzone Processes

    Robert C Dunnell, Jan F Simek•Journal of Field Archaeology•1995

  • Human adaptation and socioeonomic change in northeast China

    Gideon Shelach-Lavi, Mingyu Teng et al.•Journal of Field Archaeology•2016

  • Plow-Zone Experiments in Calabria, Italy

    A J Ammerman•Journal of Field Archaeology•1985

  • Qedesh in the Galilee

    Ido Wachtel, Uri Davidovich•Journal of Field Archaeology•2021

  • Off-Site Scatters and the Manuring Hypothesis in Greek Survey Archaeology

    Hamish Forbes, Hamish Forbes Hamish Forbes•Hesperia The Journal of the…•2013

  • Evaluating the effect of plowing on the archaeological record

    Open Access•Fernando Diez-Martín•Quaternary International•2009

  • Exploring the land

    Open Access•Alexandra Miller, C Michael Barton•Journal of Archaeological Science•2007

  • Shallow site archaeology

    Open Access•Todd A Surovell, Nicole M Waguespack et al.•Geoarchaeology•2005

  • Redistribution of archaeological assemblages in plowzones

    Open Access•Marta Navazo, Carlos Díez et al.•Geoarchaeology•2008

  • Archaeological Survey in Guadalajara

    A Burke, Manuel Alcaraz-Castaño et al.•Journal of Field Archaeology•2020

  • Surface Stone Artifact Scatters, Settlement Patterns, and New Methods for Stone Artifact Analysis

    Open Access•Simon Holdaway, Benjamin Davies•Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology•2019

  • The Lower to Middle Paleolithic transition and the diversification of Levallois technology in the Southern Levant

    Open Access•R Shimelmitz, Mina Weinstein-Evron et al.•Quaternary International•2016

  • The toolkit in the core

    Open Access•R Shimelmitz, L Kuhn•Quaternary International•2017

  • Dynamic landscapes, artifact taphonomy, and landuse modeling in the western Mediterranean

    Open Access•C Michael Barton, Joan Bernabeu Aubán et al.•Geoarchaeology•2002

  • An Archaeology of Landscapes

    Open Access•Kurt F Anschuetz, Richard H Wilshusen et al.•Journal of Archaeological Research•2001

  • Mapping the Political Landscape

    Open Access•Steve Kosiba, Andrew M Bauer•Journal of Archaeological Method…•2012

  • Surveying along the Slopes

    Open Access•Luka Gruškovnjak•Journal of Field Archaeology•2025

  • The Size Effect

    Open Access•Charles M Baker•American Antiquity•1978

  • Archaeological Survey Design, Units of Observation, and the Characterization of Regional Variability

    Open Access•Alan P Sullivan, Alan P Sullivan III et al.•American Antiquity•2007

  • Monte Alban's Hinterland, Part I

    Richard E Blanton, Stephen A Kowalewski et al.•Monte Alban's hinterland.•1982

  • Agricultural Intensification and the Evidence from Offsite Survey Archaeology

    Open Access•John Bintliff•Journal of World Prehistory•2023

  • The Harif Point

    Anthony E Marks•Paléorient•1973

  • Lithic raw material acquisition and use by early Homo sapiens at Skhul, Israel

    Open Access•Ravid Ekshtain, Christian Tryon et al.•Journal of Human Evolution•2019

  • Mediterranean myopia

    Open Access•Richard E Blanton•Antiquity•2001

  • Between the Carmel and the Sea

    Ayelet Gilboa, Ilan Sharon•Near Eastern Archaeology•2008

  • The Brown University Petra Archaeological Project

    Alex R Knodell, Susan E Alcock et al.•American Journal of Archaeology•2017

  • A grave matter

    Y Jaffe•World Archaeology•2020

  • Novel survey methods shed light on prehistoric exploration in Cyprus

    Open Access•T Stewart, Sarah T Stewart et al.•Antiquity•2017

  • Detection Functions for Archaeological Survey

    Open Access•Edward B Banning, Alicia L Hawkins et al.•American Antiquity•2006

  • Empirical Bayesian Methods for Archaeological Survey Data

    Open Access•G Ortman, Scott G Ortman et al.•American Antiquity•2007

  • Coastal Shandong, China

    Open Access•G M Feinman, Hui Fang et al.•Journal of Anthropological…•2019

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae