Inclusive innovation
Balancing Gender Equality and Gender Neutrality in Hackathons
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6058748 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Maciej Rys (0000-0002-7692-781X, University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow), Anna Maria Górska (0000-0003-3406-5454, Kozminski University) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 45 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 292-309 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-02-18 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Equal Opportunities International (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1758-7093 • E-ISSN: 2040-7149 |
| Editorial | Emerald (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1108/edi-08-2024-0344 |
| OpenAlex | W4407666378 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 45 |
Purpose This study explores women’s experiences and perceptions of gender inclusivity in hackathons, aiming to understand how tailored equality initiatives can evolve into gender-neutral, merit-based environments. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on 43 semi-structured interviews with women participants, organizers and mentors at multiple hackathons, the research employs thematic analysis to identify key barriers, strategies and long-term opportunities for advancing inclusivity. Findings The study reveals that initially focused gender equality measures help restore balance and mitigate entrenched stereotypes. Over time, transitioning to gender-neutral policies sustains hackathons as dynamic innovation platforms. Continuous feedback mechanisms, targeted interventions and robust data analytics ensure that these policies evolve, thus enhancing both the diversity of participants and the quality of their solutions. Practical implications The findings guide hackathon organizers and stakeholders in implementing adaptable measures – such as short-term mentorship programs, regular feedback loops and bias-awareness training – that respond directly to participants’ experiences. These interventions not only address current disparities but also pave the way for long-term, skill-driven meritocracies in innovation ecosystems. Social implications By informing more equitable innovation ecosystems, this research supports broader efforts to diversify STEM participation and improve gender equity. Originality/value Where previous research often treats inclusivity as an isolated concern, this study outlines a strategic, iterative pathway: from direct equality-focused actions to a genuinely merit-based context. By incorporating firsthand perspectives, it provides a nuanced, evidence-based framework that extends beyond broad recommendations
Gender balance · Originality · Political science · Psychological intervention · Public relations · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Thematic analysis · Biomedical and Engineering Education · Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences · Psychology
Female peers in small work groups enhance women's motivation, verbal participation, and career aspirations in engineering
Latent Ability
The Diversity–Innovation Paradox in Science
On Social Stability and Social Change
Gender in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics
Women in STEM
Talking Shop and Shooting the Breeze
Gender schema theory
A Threatening Intellectual Environment
Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes
Women on the Block
Resistance towards increasing gender diversity in masculine domains
Gender Mainstreaming
Gender Mainstreaming and Resistance to Gender Training
Challenging the status quo
Despite the Smoke, There Is No Gun
The implicit revolution
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Battle of the sexes
Interacting with sexist men triggers social identity threat among female engineers
Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans
Gender, language, and influence
Retraining attitudes and stereotypes to affect motivation and cognitive capacity under stereotype threat
When Does Contact with Successful Ingroup Members Change Self-Stereotypes
Grounded theory research
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 2 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |