Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Explaining the Divergence in Asylum Grant Rates among Immigration Judges

An Attitudinal and Cognitive Approach

Bibliographic Data

ID6090255
AuthorsLinda Camp Keith (The University of Texas at Austin), Jennifer S Holmes (0000-0002-7672-5935, The University of Texas at Austin), Banks Miller (0000-0002-7948-8947, The University of Texas at Austin), Banks P Miller
Year2013
Volume35
Issue4
Pages261-289
Publication date2013-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLaw & Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0265-8240 • E-ISSN: 1467-9930
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/lapo.12008
OpenAlexW1506985590
LanguageEN
Citations received30
References cited49

In seeking to understand the variation in asylum grant rates by immigration judges (IJs), we apply a variation of the attitudinal model that we modify by incorporating a cognitive model of decision making, arguing that some pieces of information before IJs are treated objectively while others are treated subjectively. This model allows us to account for informational cues that influence decisions while assessing the impact of national interests and human rights conditions. We find that IJ policy predispositions play a dominant role, and that liberal IJs respond to applicant characteristics differently than conservatives, but also that the law constrains decision making

Cognition · Divergence (linguistics · Immigration · Political science · Sociology · Variation (astronomy · Corruption and Economic Development · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Do applications respond to changes in asylum policies in European countries

    Open Access•Simone Bertoli, Herbert Brücker et al.•Regional Science and Urban…•2022

  • Thumb on the Scale

    Open Access•Maurice E Baker, Matthew E Baker•Political Research Quarterly•2026

  • Trois nuances de l’expertise stratégique

    Sule Tomkinson•Politique et Sociétés•2019

  • The Preferences of Political Elites and Humanitarian Immigration to the United States

    Open Access•Banks Miller, Jennifer S Holmes et al.•RSF The Russell Sage Foundation…•2020

  • Congressional Constraint? The Review of In Absentia Immigration Removal Orders in Federal Circuit Courts

    Open Access•Christina L Boyd, R F Carlos et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2023

  • Predicting Danger in Immigration Courts

    Open Access•Emily Ryo•Law & Social Inquiry•2019

  • Gender Bias in Asylum Adjudications

    Open Access•Alejandro Ecker, Laurenz Ennser-Jedenastik et al.•Sex Roles•2019

  • Protecting Agency Judges in an Age of Politicization

    Open Access•Daniel E Chand•The American Review of Public…•2019

  • The Limits of Refugee Status Determination Through Credibility Assessment

    Open Access•Thomas Wimark•International Migration Review•2025

  • Independence in Administrative Adjudications

    Open Access•Daniel E Chand, William D Schreckhise•Administration & Society•2020

  • Deporting children

    Open Access•Chiara Galli, Tanalís Padilla et al.•Social Forces•2025

  • A Strategy Typology

    Zayda Sorrell-Medina•Journal of Immigrant & Refugee…•2024

  • Why courts are the life buoys of migrant rights

    Open Access•Natascha Zaun, Martin Leroch et al.•Journal of European Public Policy•2024

  • Judicial diversity and immigration appeals

    Open Access•Michal Ovádek•West European Politics•2025

  • Mixed messages & bounded rationality

    Open Access•Maureen Stobb, Banks Miller et al.•Policy Studies Journal•2023

  • The Dynamics of State and Local Contexts and Immigration Asylum Hearing Decisions

    Daniel E Chand, William D Schreckhise et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2017

  • Human rights violations and the gender gap in asylum recognition rates

    Open Access•Thomas Plümper, E Neumayer•Journal of European Public Policy•2021

  • Learning to be Unbiased

    Open Access•Mathilde Emeriau•American Journal of Political…•2023

  • Children seeking asylum

    Open Access•Daniel Braaten, Claire Nolasco Braaten•Law & Policy•2021

  • Leveling the Odds

    Open Access•Banks Miller, Linda Camp Keith et al.•Law & Society Review•2015

  • Hollow law and utilitarian law

    Open Access•Lili Dao•Law & Society Review•2023

  • "A "good fit

    Open Access•Lilly Yu•Law & Society Review•2023

  • Detained

    Open Access•Emily Ryo•Law & Society Review•2016

  • Deportation Decisions

    Open Access•Asad L Asad•American Behavioral Scientist•2019

  • From the asylum official's point of view

    Katherine Jensen•New Community•2023

  • The mark of a criminal record in US immigration bond hearings

    Lorena Avila, David Ibañez•New Community•2025

  • Deciding on asylum dilemmas

    Open Access•Katerina Glyniadaki•New Community•2024

  • How the Trump Administration's Quota Policy Transformed Immigration Judging

    Open Access•Elise N Blasingame, Christina L Boyd et al.•American Political Science Review•2024

  • Preserving Law and Order

    Open Access•Angela Y Mcclean•International Political Sociology•2024

  • Sisterhood and credible narratives

    Open Access•Diego Vaes, Samantha Bielen et al.•Social Science Research•2025

  • How nations behave

    Louis Henkin•How nations behave•1979

  • The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Segal, Harold J Spaeth•Supreme Court and the Attitudinal…•2002

  • Working, Shirking, and Sabotage

    Open Access•John Brehm, John O Brehm et al.•Working, Shirking, and Sabotage•1997

  • After Hegemony

    Robert O Keohane•After Hegemony•2005

  • The halse Promise of International Institutions

    John J Mearsheimer•International Organization•2017

  • Hierarchical Linear Models

    Open Access•J Kyle Roberts•The Blackwell Encyclopedia of…•2007

  • The Political Terror Scale (PTS)

    Robert Muir Wood, Reed M Wood et al.•Human Rights Quarterly•2010

  • The Power of Human Rights

    Open Access•Steve C Ropp, Thomas Risse-Kappen et al.•Power of Human Rights•1999

  • The Use and Misuse of ‘National Security’ Rationale in Crafting U.S. Refugee and Immigration Policies

    Donald Kerwin•International Journal of Refugee…•2005

  • Law of Asylum in the United States

    Jane Mcadam•International Journal of Refugee…•2012

  • A Rare Examination of Typically Unobservable Factors in US Asylum Decisions

    Linda Camp Keith, Jennifer S Holmes•Journal of Refugee Studies•2009

  • A Comparative Analysis of the Asylum Policy of Seven European Governments

    Liza Schuster•Journal of Refugee Studies•2000

  • Deterrence Measures and the Preservation of Asylum in the United Kingdom and United States

    Liman Sa‘adatu Hassan, L HASSAN•Journal of Refugee Studies•2000

  • USA Refugee Policy

    Mark Gibney, Vanessa K Dalton et al.•Journal of Refugee Studies•1992

  • What's Law Got to Do with It? Judicial Behavioralists Test the “Legal Model” of Judicial Decision Making

    Open Access•Howard Gillman•Law & Social Inquiry•2001

  • The Causes of Pro-Immigration Voting in the United States Supreme Court

    Open Access•Melissa G Ocepek, Joel S Fetzer•International Migration Review•2010

  • The Path to Asylum in the US and the Determinants for who Gets in and Why

    Open Access•Andy J Rottman, Christopher J Fari et al.•International Migration Review•2009

  • Calculated Kindness

    Michael G Heyman, Gil Loescher et al.•International Migration Review•1987

  • An analysis of public opinion toward undocumented immigration

    Open Access•Thomas J Espenshade, Charles A Calhoun•Population Research and Policy…•1993

  • An analysis of public opinion toward undocumented immigration

    Open Access•Thomas J Espenshade, Charles A Calhoun•Population Research and Policy…•1994

  • The False Promise of International Institutions

    John J Mearsheimer•International Security•1994

  • Measuring the ideological preferences of U.S. presidents

    Open Access•Mark A Zupan•Public Choice•1992

  • Asylum Recognition Rates in Western Europe

    Open Access•E Neumayer•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2005

  • The European Union after 9/11

    Open Access•Carl Levy•Government and Opposition•2005

  • Theory of international politics

    Kenneth Neal Waltz•Theory of international politics•1979

  • An Empirical Test of the Rational-Actor Theory of Litigation

    Donald R Songer, Charles M Cameron et al.•The Journal of Politics•1995

  • International Relations, Domestic Politics, and Asylum Admissions in the United States

    Open Access•Idean Salehyan, Marc R Rosenblum•Political Research Quarterly•2008

  • What Judges Want

    Lawrence Baum•Political Research Quarterly•1994

  • On compliance

    Open Access•Abram Chayes, Antonia Handler Chayes•International Organization•1993

  • Mechanism of Motivated Reasoning? Analogical Perception in Discrimination Disputes

    Open Access•Eileen Braman, Thomas E Nelson•American Journal of Political…•2007

  • Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging

    Open Access•Christina L Boyd, Lee Epstein et al.•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • Time Binding and Theory Building in Personal Attribute Models of Supreme Court Voting Behavior, 1916-88

    C Neal Tate, Roger Handberg•American Journal of Political…•1991

  • Does the Fear of Terrorists Trump the Fear of Persecution in Asylum Outcomes in the Post–September 11 Era

    Open Access•Jennifer S Holmes, Linda Camp Keith•PS Political Science & Politics•2010

  • A Refugee from Justice? Disparate Treatment in the Federal Court of Canada

    Open Access•Jon B Gould, Colleen Sheppard et al.•Law & Policy•2010

  • Norms and Interests in US Asylum Enforcement

    Open Access•Marc R Rosenblum, Idean Salehyan•Journal of Peace Research•2004

  • Repression of Human Rights to Personal Integrity in the 1980s

    Open Access•Steven C Poe, C Neal Tate•American Political Science Review•1994

  • Accounting for the effects of accountability

    Jennifer S Lerner, Philip E Tetlock•Psychological Bulletin•1999

  • How Nations Behave. Law and Foreign Policy

    Louis Henkin•Verfassung in Recht und Übersee•1969

  • Expertise, Experience, and Ideology on Specialized Courts

    Open Access•Banks Miller, Brett Curry•Law & Society Review•2009

  • On the Nature of Supreme Court Decision Making

    Open Access•Tracey E George, Lee Epstein•American Political Science Review•1992

  • Social Backgrounds as Predictors of Votes On State Courts of Last Resort

    Gerard S Gryski, Eleanor C Main et al.•The Western Political Quarterly•1986

  • Workload Influences on Supreme Court Case Acceptance Rates, 1975-1984

    Open Access•Joseph Jucewicz, Lawrence Baum•The Western Political Quarterly•1990

Unique citing works30
Citations per year2,73
Citation span2015 - 2026 (12)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 30

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae