Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Attending the Giraffe

Bibliographic Data

ID6148705
AuthorsJody Berland (York University, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume9
Issue1
Pages22-45
Publication date2017-09-22
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHumanimalia (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2151-8645 • E-ISSN: 2151-8645
PublisherHumanimalia, Utrecht University (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.52537/humanimalia.9612
OpenAlexW4245097128
LanguageEN
References cited10

In this article I compare the story of the first contact tribute giraffe sent from Bengal to China in 1414 with the story of April, the famously web-cam pregnant giraffe of 2017. Both giraffes were transported by new technologies that brought together geographically dispersed people through a notable event. Both giraffes had to be conveyed from natural habitats into confinement, from distance into quasi-intimacy with European and global observers, from matriarchal family structure into an individual with a face that could at least hypothetically look back at its human viewer. The space between these two events has been marked by the emergence of a capitalist world order together with growing public anxiety about environmental risk. This shared precarity, commonly named the Anthropocene, is widely conceptualized as the result of human domination of and estrangement from nature. But the history of the giraffe reminds us that some people were estranged from nature, while others were defined by and exploited precisely because of their proximity to its resources. Each step of being made visible has relied on something else being made invisible. The double act of foregrounding and disappearing has discursively shaped both our relations with animals and the visual aesthetics of modern culture. To borrow Marshall McLuhan’s well-known phrase, the medium is the message, and in this article, the medium is an animal. Two giraffes, two historical eras, two distinct sociopolitical and technological situations. Why giraffes, and what are they mediating

Aesthetics · Anthropocene · Art · Art history · Biology · Environmental ethics · Ephemeral key · Event (particle physics · Face (sociological concept · Foregrounding · Liminality · Literature · Media studies · Precarity · Social science · Sociology · Tribute · Gender Studies · Geographies of human-animal interactions · History · Ecology

  • Audience for a Giraffe

    Erik Ringmar•Journal of world history•2006

  • Critical Terms for Media Studies

    W J T Mitchell, Mark B N Hansen•Critical Terms for Media Studies•2010

  • Animal and/as Medium

    Jody Berland•The Global South•2009

  • Charismatic life

    Cheryl Lousley•Environmental Communication•2016

  • The Marvelous Clouds

    John Durham Peters•Marvelous Clouds•2015

  • Creaturely Poetics

    Anat Pick•Creaturely poetics•2011

  • Understanding media

    Marshall Mcluhan, Marshal McLuhan•Understanding media•1994

  • The Vanishing Mediator

    Fredric Jameson•New German Critique•1973

  • Culture and Imperialism

    Andrew J Pierre, Edward Said et al.•Foreign Affairs•1993

  • The Climate of History

    Dipesh Chakrabarty•Critical Inquiry•2009

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae