Forward to the past
Lessons for the future of e-government from the story so far
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6149045 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Frank Bannister (0000-0003-3673-0374, Trinity College Dublin), Robert Connolly (0000-0003-3196-2889, Dublin City University) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 3,4 |
| Pages | 211-226 |
| Publication date | 2012-12-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Information Polity (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1875-8754 • E-ISSN: 1570-1255 |
| Publisher | IOS Press (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.3233/ip-2012-000282 |
| OpenAlex | W1916199046 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 23 |
| References cited | 17 |
While the development of e-government since the early 1990s has been characterized by many successful applications and systems, it has also been notable for a number of failures to fully realise visions and for several stalled ideas. Governments, professionals and indeed scholars have a tendency to embrace the latest technological developments before older ones have been fully exploited or in some cases even fully understood and this can leave a trail of uncompleted projects in its wake. The future success of e-government depends in part on understanding this phenomenon, addressing it and developing the ability to discern when a technology or concept is no longer of value and therefore should be abandoned and when a task needs to be finished properly, no matter how unglamorous that task may be
Business · E-Government · Economics · Epistemology · Government (linguistics · Information and Communications Technology · Management · Phenomenon · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Task (project management · Value (mathematics · Vision · Computer Science · Digital Platforms and Economics · E-Government and Public Services · ICT Impact and Policies · Law
Big data in the policy cycle
Advancing Citizen Engagement Through Digital Tools
Trust, Integrity and the Weaponising of Information
What is the point of benchmarking e-government? An integrative and critical literature review on the phenomenon of benchmarking e-government
E-regulation and the rule of law
The practitioners guide to a digital index
How European Union policy actors use and assess the effectiveness of e-transparency
Social media for openness and accountability in the public sector
Universal and contextualized public services
Sustainable eGovernance? Practices, problems and beliefs about the future in Swedish eGov practice
Why E-participation systems fail
Context clues for the stall of the Citizens’ Initiative
Exploring services in a smart city through socio-technical design principles
Smart advisors in the front office
Dynamic capabilities of a smart city
From conventional governance to e-democracy
A matter of perspective
A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Research on the Impacts of e‐Government
Implementing e-government in hard times
Big questions of e-government research
Financial incentives and open government
An empirical study of the role of e-government benchmarking in China
Incorporating agile practices in public sector IT management
User Acceptance of Information Technology
Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology
The Chinese Room Argument
The Culture of Contentment
Sociopolitical Aspects of Interoperability and Enterprise Architecture in E-Government
Do they want it? Do they use it? The ‘Demand-Side’ of e-Government in Australia and New Zealand
A two-stage model of e-government growth
Interoperability frameworks and enterprise architectures in e-government initiatives in Europe and the United States
Reinventing Local Governments and the E‐Government Initiative
Joined-Up Government in Ireland
Is the party over? The decline of party activism and membership across the democratic world
The virtual public servant
Just how risky is online voting
| Unique citing works | 23 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,64 |
| Citation span | 2012 - 2026 (15) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 23 |