Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

An empirical study of the role of e-government benchmarking in China

Bibliographic Data

ID6149129
AuthorsJesper Schlæger (0000-0003-2999-1103, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume21
Issue4
Pages383-397
Publication date2016-12-22
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInformation Polity (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1875-8754 • E-ISSN: 1570-1255
PublisherIOS Press (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.3233/ip-160399
OpenAlexW2563709581
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited36

The topic of this paper is the role of benchmarking in Chinese e-government. Through content analysis of documentary material, this paper addresses the following questions: Which benchmarking schemes have been applied to e-government in China? What are the intentions behind the different benchmarking schemes? and Whose interests are served? Whereas previous research finds that benchmarking addresses mainly the front office of e-government (websites), this paper finds that organizational indicators are also used. Benchmarking efforts now increasingly address the back office, and basic benchmarking schemes have become institutionalized into a census. Benchmarking reinforces the interests of the central government and communicates the values of the Communist Party to the fragmented bureaucracy. In this way, benchmarking is used as an integrative mechanism that centralizes governance while maintaining adaptive capacity at the local level

Benchmarking · Business · China · E-Government · Empirical research · Geography · Government (linguistics · Information and Communications Technology · Political science · Regional science · Statistics · E-Government and Public Services · Local Government Finance and Decentralization · Mathematics · Public Policy and Administration Research · Marketing

  • What is the point of benchmarking e-government? An integrative and critical literature review on the phenomenon of benchmarking e-government

    Open Access•Fredric Skargren•Information Polity•2020

  • What shapes the formation of interstate benchmarking networks

    Open Access•Shuai Cao, Hongtao Yi•Review of Policy Research•2025

  • “Fragmented Authoritarianism 2.0”

    Open Access•Andrew Mertha•The China Quarterly•2009

  • The politics of performance measurement

    Open Access•Bente Bjørnholt, Flemming Larsen•Evaluation•2014

  • China's Political System

    Michel Oksenberg•The China Journal•2001

  • E-Government in China

    Open Access•Xiang Zhou•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2006

  • Exploring Online Structures on Chinese Government Portals

    Open Access•Min Jiang, Heng Xu•Social Science Computer Review•2009

  • The forgotten promise of e-government maturity

    Open Access•Kim Normann Andersen, Rony Medaglia et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2011

  • E-government success factors

    Open Access•Jose Ramon Gil-Garcia, Theresa A Pardo•Government Information Quarterly•2005

  • Integration and coordination

    Open Access•Xian Gao, Yingfa Song et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2013

  • Strategic e-government development and the role of benchmarking

    Open Access•Endrit Kromidha•Government Information Quarterly•2012

  • Benchmarking e-Government

    Open Access•Abebe Rorissa, Dawit Demissie et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2011

  • Is Success and Failure—the Problem of Scale

    Open Access•David Kreps, Helen Richardson•The Political Quarterly•2007

  • The curse of the benchmark

    Open Access•Frank Bannister•International Review of…•2007

  • The Architecture of Control

    Open Access•Randolph Kluver•Journal of Public Policy•2005

  • What can ‘benchmarking’ offer the open method of co-ordination

    James Arrowsmith, Keith Sissons et al.•Journal of European Public Policy•2004

  • Europeanization of eGovernment policy. Institutional mechanisms and implications for public sector innovation

    Open Access•J Ignacio Criado Grande•Information Polity•2009

  • E-Government in Africa

    Richard Heeks•Information Polity•2003

  • Local e-government Benchlearning

    Joan Batlle-Montserrat, Josep Blat et al.•Information Polity•2016

  • Forward to the past

    Frank Bannister, Robert Connolly•Information Polity•2012

  • The Reinvention of Development Planning in China, 1993–2012

    Open Access•Sebastian Heilmann, Oliver Melton•Modern China•2013

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,33
Citation span2020 - 2025 (6)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae