Assessing source material difficulty for consecutive interpreting
Quantifiable measures and holistic judgment
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6152298 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Minhua Liu (0000-0003-0642-1407, Fu Jen University), Yu-Hsien Chiu (National Taiwan Normal University) |
| Year | 2009 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 244-266 |
| Publication date | 2009-09-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Interpreting International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1384-6647 • E-ISSN: 1569-982X |
| Publisher | John Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1075/intp.11.2.07liu |
| OpenAlex | W1984126763 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 24 |
| References cited | 9 |
Motivated by the need for better control of standards of a certification examination for interpreters in Taiwan, this exploratory study aimed at identifying indicators that may be used to predict source material difficulty for consecutive interpreting. A combination of quantifiable measures — readability level, information density and new concept density — was used to examine different aspects of three English source materials. Expert judgment was also used as a more holistic method of judging source material difficulty. The results of these analyses were compared with two groups of student interpreters’ performance on consecutive interpreting of the source materials into Mandarin Chinese. The participants’ assessment of speech difficulty after the interpreting task was also compared with the other measures and the expert judgment. The quantifiable measures all failed statistically in predicting source material difficulty, possibly due to the very small sample size of the materials or to the fact that the materials were very similar in the aspects assessed by these measures. A trend emerged to suggest that information density and sentence length may be potentially useful indicators for predicting source material difficulty. It was also shown that source material difficulty affected the performance of lower-skilled interpreters more than that of higher-skilled interpreters
Certification · Information source (mathematics · Interpreter · Linguistics · Mandarin Chinese · Natural language processing · Readability · Sample (material · Sentence · Statistics · Computer Science · Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare · Mathematics · Psychology
Number training in simultaneous interpreting
Impact of Directionality on Student Interpreters’ Performance in Consecutive Interpreting
Pre-task cultural knowledge preparation and its effects on consecutive interpreting quality
Language in interpreting
Effects of note-taking on the accuracy and fluency of consecutive interpreters' immediate free recall of source texts
Parallel translation process in consecutive interpreting
Cognitive processing of the extra visual layer of live captioning in simultaneous interpreting. Triangulation of eye-tracked process and performance data
Interpreting testing and assessment
Self‐Report and Physiological Arousal in Measuring Interpreting‐Related Anxiety
Dependency distance as indicator for cognitive load in into-B interpreting
Coping with syntactic complexity in English–Chinese sight translation by translation and interpreting students
Investigating the effects of speech rate and accent on simultaneous interpretation
Collaborative learning in interpreting
How does interpreting performance correlate with note-taking process, note-taking product and note-reading process? An eye-tracking and pen-recording study
The construct of cognitive load in interpreting and its measurement
The effect of cognitive load on simultaneous interpreting performance
Note-taking effort in video remote interpreting
Empowering Metacognitive Interpreter Training
Visual processing during computer-assisted consecutive interpreting
Developing an analytic scale for assessing undergraduate students’ consecutive interpreting performances
Assessing the fidelity of consecutive interpreting
Text characteristics, perceived difficulty and task performance in sight translation
Ear–voice span in simultaneous interpreting
Effect of dependency distance of source text on disfluencies in interpreting
A new readability yardstick.
Linguistic Complexity and Text Comprehension
Simultaneous Interpretation
Working memory and expertise in simultaneous interpreting
Conscious monitoring of attention during simultaneous interpretation
Simultaneous interpreters and the effect of concurrent articulation on immediate memory
The linguistic assumptions underlying readability formulae
Simultaneous Listening and Speaking in English into Korean Simultaneous Interpretation
Speech Proportion and Accuracy in Simultaneous Interpretation from English into Korean
| Unique citing works | 24 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,18 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2026 (12) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 24 |