Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The When and Why of Nominations

Determinants of Presidential Appointments

Bibliographic Data

ID6180144
AuthorsGary E Hollibaugh (0000-0001-9844-2437, University of Notre Dame, corresponding author), Lawrence S Rothenberg (0000-0003-2788-5585, University of Rochester)
Year2017
Volume45
Issue2
Pages280-303
Publication date2017-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Politics Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1532-673X • E-ISSN: 1552-3373
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1532673x16628266
OpenAlexW3125663870
LanguageEN
Citations received19
References cited44

Scholars interested in bargaining over political appointments typically analyze the duration between the candidate’s nomination and eventual disposition, ignoring the prior period between vacancy and nomination. Using a dataset of vacancies reported to the Government Accountability Office, we instead examine the nomination stage. We uncover both commonalities and differences between the dynamics of nomination and those of confirmation. Ideological divergence between the President and the Senate filibuster pivot tends to delay nominations but only under divided government. Presidents not only move more quickly on more important positions, but are also influenced by the ideological leanings of the agencies

Accountability · Ideology · Law and economics · Nomination · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research

  • Presidential Strategy amidst the “Broken” Appointments Process

    Open Access•Christopher Piper•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2022

  • Going for Goals

    Open Access•Christopher Piper•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2022

  • Prioritizing Judicial Nominations after Presidential Transitions

    Open Access•Jonathan M King, Ian Ostrander•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2020

  • Party Defection in Senate Confirmations of Executive Nominees

    Ryan Bookstein, Kristina C Miler•Congress & the Presidency•2026

  • Executive policymaking influence via the administrative apparatus

    Open Access•Susan Webb Yackee•Public Administration Review•2024

  • Appointee vacancies in US executive branch agencies

    Open Access•William G Resh, Gary E Hollibaugh et al.•Journal of Public Policy•2021

  • Presidential directives in a resistant bureaucracy

    Open Access•Alex Acs•Journal of Public Policy•2021

  • Agency control through the appointed hierarchy

    Open Access•Gary E Hollibaugh, Lawrence S Rothenberg•Journal of Public Policy•2024

  • Appointments and attrition

    Open Access•Gary E Hollibaugh, Lawrence S Rothenberg•Journal of Public Policy•2020

  • Do Vacancies Hurt Federal Agency Performance

    Open Access•Christopher Piper, David E Lewis•Journal of Public Administration…•2023

  • The Incompetence Trap

    Gary E Hollibaugh•Journal of Public Administration…•2016

  • The Who, When, and Where of Executive Nominations

    Open Access•Gary E Hollibaugh, Lawrence S Rothenberg•American Journal of Political…•2018

  • The Longer You Wait, the Longer It Takes

    Heather Ba, Brandon Schneider et al.•Congress & the Presidency•2022

  • Competition or Collusion? How Presidents and the Senate Evade or Enforce Statutory Requirements for Ambassadorial Nominees

    Evan T Haglund•Congress & the Presidency•2022

  • Studying Bureaucracy in a Diverse Democracy

    Alexander Bolton, Sharece Thrower•Congress & the Presidency•2023

  • Quick to Judge? Confirmation by Cloture in the Post-Nuclear Senate

    Open Access•Jonathan M King, Ian Ostrander•American Politics Research•2025

  • Control without Confirmation

    Open Access•Christina M Kinane•American Political Science Review•2021

  • As sabatinas dos indicados ao TCU no pós-1988

    Open Access•Cecília Olivieri, David Guilherme Andriotto Gonçalves et al.•Revista Brasileira de Ciência…•2025

  • The confirmation hearings of appointees to the Brazilian Federal Court of Accounts post-1988

    Open Access•Cecília Olivieri, David Guilherme Andriotto Gonçalves et al.•Revista Brasileira de Ciência…•2025

  • The Politics of Presidential Appointments

    David E Lewis•Politics of Presidential…•2008

  • The Efficiency of Cox's Likelihood Function for Censored Data

    Bradley Efron•Journal of the American…•1977

  • Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations

    Edward L Kaplan, Paul Meier•Journal of the American…•1958

  • Regression Models and Life-Tables

    Open Access•D R Cox•Journal of the Royal Statistical…•1972

  • Pivotal Politics

    Keith Krehbiel•Pivotal Politics•1998

  • Senate Gate-Keeping, Presidential Staffing of “Inferior Offices,” and the Ideological Composition of Appointments to the Public Bureaucracy

    Adam Bonica, Jowei Chen et al.•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2015

  • Pivotal Politics, Presidential Capital, and Supreme Court Nominations

    Timothy R Johnson, Jason M Roberts•Congress & the Presidency•2005

  • The Invisible Presidential Appointments

    Open Access•David E Lewis, Richard W Waterman•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2013

  • The Appointments Process and the Administrative Presidency

    Open Access•Joel D Aberbach, Bert A Rockman•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2009

  • Staffing Alone

    Open Access•David E Lewis•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2005

  • The Political Determinants of Ambassadorial Appointments

    Open Access•Gary E Hollibaugh•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2015

  • Experiential Learning and Presidential Management of the U.S. Federal Bureaucracy

    Open Access•George A Krause, George Krause et al.•American Journal of Political…•2016

  • Changing minds? Not in Congress

    Open Access•Keith T Poole•Public Choice•2007

  • The Triumph of Loyalty Over Competence

    Open Access•Donald P Moynihan, Alasdair Roberts et al.•Public Administration Review•2010

  • A Unified Theory of U.S. Lawmaking

    Fang-Yi Chiou, Fang‐yi Chiou et al.•The Journal of Politics•2009

  • Recovering a Basic Space From a Set of Issue Scales

    Keith T Poole•American Journal of Political…•1998

  • Naive Cronyism and Neutral Competence

    Gary E Hollibaugh•Journal of Public Administration…•2014

  • Advice and Consent

    Nolan Mccarty, Rose Razaghian•American Journal of Political…•1999

  • Dividers, Not Uniters

    Frances E Lee, Frances Lee•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • The Changing Dynamics of Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees

    Lee Epstein, René Lindstädt et al.•The Journal of Politics•2006

  • Presidential Capital and the Supreme Court Confirmation Process

    Timothy R Johnson, Jason M Roberts•The Journal of Politics•2004

  • Recommendations for an Effective 2008 Transition

    Open Access•Clay Johnson•Public Administration Review•2008

  • Senatorial Discourtesy

    Open Access•Lauren C Bell•Political Research Quarterly•2002

  • Expert Opinion, Agency Characteristics, and Agency Preferences

    Open Access•Joshua D Clinton, David E Lewis•Political Analysis•2008

  • Female and Minority Judicial Nominees

    Open Access•Nicole Asmussen, Nicole Jo Asmussen•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2011

  • Vacancies, vetting, and votes

    Open Access•Gary E Hollibaugh•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2015

  • Federal employee unionization and presidential control of the bureaucracy

    Open Access•Jowei Chen, Tim Johnson•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2015

  • Executive appointments

    Open Access•Fang-Yi Chiou, Fang‐yi Chiou et al.•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2014

  • Nonproportional Hazards and Event History Analysis in International Relations

    Open Access•J M Box-Steffensmeier, Dan Reiter et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2003

  • Comparable Preference Estimates across Time and Institutions for the Court, Congress, and Presidency

    Open Access•Michael A Bailey•American Journal of Political…•2007

  • Slackers and Zealots

    Open Access•Sean Gailmard, John W Patty•American Journal of Political…•2007

  • Time is of the Essence

    J M Box-Steffensmeier, Bradford Jones et al.•American Journal of Political…•1997

  • Delaying Justice(s)

    Charles R Shipan, Megan L Shannon•American Journal of Political…•2003

  • Duration Models and Proportional Hazards in Political Science

    J M Box-Steffensmeier, Christopher J W Zorn et al.•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • Parametric Models, Duration Dependence, and Time-Varying Data Revisited

    D Scott Bennett•American Journal of Political…•1999

  • The Logic of Collective Inaction

    Open Access•Ian Ostrander•American Journal of Political…•2016

  • Separated Powers in the United States

    Open Access•Joshua D Clinton, Anthony M Bertelli et al.•American Journal of Political…•2012

  • Presidents and Patronage

    Open Access•Gary E Hollibaugh, Gabriel Horton et al.•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • The Changing Politics of Federal Judicial Nominations

    Scott Basinger, Maxwell Mak•Congress & the Presidency•2010

  • Politicizing Priority Departments

    Open Access•Kevin Parsneau•American Politics Research•2013

  • The Increasing Senate Scrutiny of Lower Federal Court Nominees

    Open Access•Roger E Hartley, Lisa M Holmes et al.•Political Science Quarterly•2002

  • From Abe Fortas to Zoë Baird

    Open Access•Glen S Krutz, Glen Krutz et al.•American Political Science Review•1998

  • Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees

    Open Access•Charles M Cameron, Albert D Cover et al.•American Political Science Review•1990

Unique citing works19
Citations per year1,9
Citation span2016 - 2026 (11)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 19

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae