Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Support For A Supreme Court Affirmative Action Decision

A Story in Black and White

Bibliographic Data

ID6180202
AuthorsRosalee A Clawson (0000-0003-2217-3968), Eric N Waltenburg (0000-0003-3901-2503, Purdue University West Lafayette)
Year2003
Volume31
Issue3
Pages251-279
Publication date2003-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Politics Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1532-673X • E-ISSN: 1552-3373
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1532673x03251197
OpenAlexW2082412753
LanguageEN
Citations received33
References cited37

Unlike other policy-making institutions that actively attempt to shape public opinion, the Supreme Court is largely dependent upon others to disseminate its policy pronouncements to the public. One consequence: How the media frame the Court’s actions can affect public support for Court policies. This article presents the results of an experiment designed to take soundings on the effect of different media frames on White and Black support for a controversial affirmative action ruling. Using stimuli we created based on coverage of the Adarand v. Pena (1995) decision in the Black press and the mainstream press, we find that media framing has a significant effect on agreement with the Court’s policy among White subjects. For Blacks, the impact of the media framing is moderated by ideological predispositions. In addition, both White and Black support for the Court’s ruling is influenced by the media portrayal of Justice Clarence Thomas

Affirmative action · Concurring opinion · Court of record · Ideology · Mainstream · Majority opinion · News media · Original jurisdiction · Political science · Politics · Public opinion · Sociology · Supreme court · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law, Rights, and Freedoms · Legal Issues in Education

  • Backlash or a Positive Response

    Emily Kazyak, Mathew Stange•Journal of Homosexuality•2018

  • Understanding Affirmative Action

    Faye J Crosby, Aarti Iyer et al.•Annual Review of Psychology•2006

  • Between law and conscience

    Open Access•Mane Kara-Yakoubian, Jonathan A Fugelsang et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2026

  • The Political Effects of Affirmative Action

    Open Access•Abhay Aneja, Jacob M Grumbach•The Journal of Legal Studies•2025

  • Executives Strike Back

    Open Access•Matthew Montgomery, Natalie Rogol et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2024

  • Politicization and the Two Modes of Evaluating Judicial Decisions

    Open Access•Benjamin Woodson•Journal of Law and Courts•2015

  • Understanding coverage of rights claiming in LGBTQ+ media

    Perry Mcd Collins, Charles E Pierce et al.•Politics Groups and Identities•2025

  • Between Usefulness and Legitimacy

    Open Access•Oliver Quiring, Mathias Weber•The International Journal of…•2012

  • Understanding Variations in Media Coverage of U.S. Supreme Court Decisions

    Open Access•Donald P Haider-Markel, Mahalley D Allen et al.•Harvard International Journal of…•2006

  • Frame Spillover

    Open Access•Stephen M Engel•Law & Social Inquiry•2012

  • The Mechanisms of Ethnoracialization and Asian American Support for Race-conscious Admissions

    Open Access•Ji-Won Lee, W Carson Byrd•Sociology of Race and Ethnicity•2024

  • How low can we go

    Open Access•Matthew Montgomery, Natalie Rogol•Social Science Quarterly•2023

  • Defying the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Michael A Zilis, Xander Borne•Social Science Quarterly•2021

  • Disagreeable Rhetoric and the Prospect of Public Opposition

    Open Access•Justin Wedeking, Michael A Zilis•Political Research Quarterly•2017

  • Media Coverage and Public Approval of the U.S. Supreme Court

    Matthew P Hitt, Kathleen Searles•Political Communication•2018

  • Public Opinion Reaction to Repeated Events

    Open Access•Danette Brickman, Drexel A Peterson et al.•Political Behavior•2006

  • Naming Names

    Open Access•Scott S Boddery, Laura P Moyer et al.•Law & Society Review•2019

  • Perpetuating the Myth of the Culture War Court? Issue Attention in Newspaper Coverage of U.S. Supreme Court Nominations

    Open Access•Michael Evans, Shanna Pearson-Merkowitz•American Politics Research•2012

  • Explaining Processes of Institutional Opinion Leadership

    Brandon L Bartels, Diana C Mutz•The Journal of Politics•2009

  • Issue-Specific Opinion Change

    D P Christenson, David M Glick•Public Opinion Quarterly•2015

  • Sensationalism and Sobriety Differential Media Exposure and Attitudes Toward American Courts

    Chris Johnston, C D Johnston et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2010

  • Ideas, Discourse, and Rhetoric in Political Choice

    Open Access•Leigh Raymond, Andrea Olive•Polity•2009

  • Reassessing the Impact of Supreme Court Decisions on Public Opinion

    Open Access•James W Stoutenborough, Donald P Haider-Markel et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2006

  • Shattering the Myth of Legality

    Open Access•Vanessa A Baird, Amy Gangl•Political Psychology•2006

  • Finding the Right Value

    Open Access•Amelia Caron Andrews, Rosalee A Clawson et al.•Political Psychology•2017

  • The Supreme Court and Issue Attention

    Joseph Daniel Ura•Political Communication•2009

  • Supreme Court Legitimacy and Group-Centric Forces

    Open Access•Rosalee A Clawson, Elizabeth R Kegler et al.•Political Behavior•2003

  • The Racialization of the United States Supreme Court? Examining Changes in Public Opinion Toward SCOTUS Over Time

    Open Access•K Shoub, Jamie S Scott et al.•Political Behavior•2025

  • Can Affirmative Motivations Improve Compliance in Emissions Trading Programs

    Open Access•Leigh Raymond, Timothy N Cason•Policy Studies Journal•2011

  • Using cross‐encoders to measure the similarity of short texts in political science

    Open Access•Gechun Lin•American Journal of Political…•2025

  • After the Supreme Word

    Open Access•Michael A Unger•American Politics Research•2008

  • Losing, but Accepting

    Open Access•James L Gibson, Milton Lodge et al.•Law & Society Review•2014

  • Media Framing and Public Attitudes Toward Biofuels

    Open Access•Ashlie Delshad, Ashlie B Delshad et al.•Review of Policy Research•2013

  • Black visions

    Michael C Dawson•Black visions•2001

  • Chapter 6 Understanding Whites' Resistance to Affirmative Action

    Laura Stoker•Perception and Prejudice•2017

  • The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion

    Open Access•John R Zaller, John Zaller•Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion•1992

  • With Malice toward Some

    Open Access•George E Marcus, John L Sullivan et al.•With Malice Toward Some•1995

  • Experimental Foundations of Political Science

    Donald Kinder, Thomas R Palfrey•Experimental foundations of…•1993

  • Institutional Legitimacy, Policy Legitimacy, and the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Jeffery J Mondak•American Politics Quarterly•1992

  • Perception and Prejudice

    Jon Hurwitz, Mark Peffley•Perception and Prejudice•2017

  • Framing Supreme Court Decisions

    Open Access•Rosalee A Clawson, Harry C “neil” Strine et al.•Journal of Black Studies•2003

  • The Legitimacy-conferring Authority of the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Rosalee A Clawson, Elizabeth R Kegler et al.•American Politics Research•2001

  • Issue Frames and Group-Centrism in American Public Opinion

    Thomas E Nelson, Donald R Kinder•The Journal of Politics•1996

  • The Shepherding of Local Public Opinion

    Valerie J Hoekstra, Jeffrey A Segal•The Journal of Politics•1996

  • On Hearing and Interpreting Political Messages

    James H Kuklinski, Norman L Hurley•The Journal of Politics•1994

  • Blacks and the United States Supreme Court

    James L Gibson, Gregory A Caldeira•The Journal of Politics•1992

  • The Political and Social Relevancy of Malcolm X

    Darren W Davis, Christian Davenport•The Journal of Politics•1997

  • On the Limits of Framing Effects

    James N Druckman•The Journal of Politics•2001

  • Policy Legitimacy and the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Jeffery J Mondak•Political Research Quarterly•1994

  • The intersection of race and crime in television news stories

    Mark Peffley, Mark Hurwitz Peffley et al.•Political Communication•1996

  • Perceived legitimacy of Supreme Court decisions

    Open Access•Jeffery J Mondak•Political Behavior•1990

  • Toward a Psychology of Framing Effects

    Open Access•Thomas E Nelson, Zoe M Oxley et al.•Political Behavior•1997

  • The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court

    Gregory A Caldeira, James L Gibson•American Journal of Political…•1992

  • Prime Suspects

    Franklin D Gilliam, Sharad Iyengar et al.•American Journal of Political…•2000

  • Exploring the Racial Divide

    Donald R Kinder, Nicholas Winter et al.•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • Prejudice and politics

    Donald R Kinder, David O Sears•Journal of Personality and Social…•1981

  • Race Trumps Gender

    Open Access•Joanna Mansbridge, Jane Mansbridge et al.•PS Political Science & Politics•1992

  • College sophomores in the laboratory

    David O Sears•Journal of Personality and Social…•1986

  • Understandings of Justice

    Open Access•James L Gibson•Law & Society Review•1989

  • The Supreme Court and Local Public Opinion

    Open Access•Valerie J Hoekstra•American Political Science Review•2000

  • Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance

    Open Access•Thomas E Nelson, Rosalee A Clawson et al.•American Political Science Review•1997

  • The Boundaries of Blackness

    Cathy J Cohen, Cathy Cohen•The boundaries of blackness•1999

Unique citing works33
Citations per year1,43
Citation span2003 - 2026 (24)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 32

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae