Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

How Partisan Conflict in Congress Affects Public Opinion

Strategies, Outcomes, and Issue Differences

Bibliographic Data

ID6180296
AuthorsD J Flynn (0000-0002-4143-8098, Northwestern University), Laurel Harbridge (Northwestern University, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume44
Issue5
Pages875-902
Publication date2016-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Politics Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1532-673X • E-ISSN: 1552-3373
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1532673x15610425
OpenAlexW2277857572
LanguageEN
Citations received16
References cited70

Scholars are increasingly interested in how partisan conflict in Congress affects public evaluations of institutional performance. Yet, existing research overlooks how the public responds to one of the most widely discussed consequences of partisan conflict: legislative gridlock. We develop expectations about how partisan conflict resulting in partisan wins, losses, and gridlock will affect evaluations of Congress, and how these relationships will differ across consensus and non-consensus issues. Results from two survey experiments indicate that partisan conflict resulting in a victory for one’s own party boosts approval relative to compromise, but conflict resulting in gridlock substantially damages approval. However, the degree to which gridlock decreases approval hinges on the type of policy under consideration. On consensus issues, citizens reward legislative action by either party—their party or the opposing party—over gridlock

Compromise · Damages · Divided government · Economics · Gridlock · Law and economics · Legislature · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Public opinion · Public relations · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research

  • Antipartyism and Public Opinion toward Presidential Unilateral Actions

    Open Access•Tsung-Han Tsai, Ching-Hsin Yu•International Journal of Public…•2019

  • Depictions of Partisan Bias at Oral Argument and Public Evaluations of the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Joshua Boston, Christopher Krewson et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2026

  • The Political Determinants of Public Support for Obstruction of Supreme Court Nominees

    Open Access•Andrew Stones•Journal of Law and Courts•2024

  • Media Coverage of the Senate Filibuster and Its Effects on Public Opinion

    Open Access•Scott R Meinke•Political Research Quarterly•2024

  • Proving Her Strength

    Open Access•Nicole Huffman, Lauren P Olson et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2025

  • Claiming and Blaming

    Open Access•Jessie E Munson•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2026

  • Divisions at Home, Broken Promises Abroad? How Domestic Politics Shapes the United States’ Nuclear Credibility

    Open Access•Helen Webley-Brown, Lauren Sukin•International Studies Quarterly•2026

  • Breaking Down Bipartisanship

    Celia Paris•Public Opinion Quarterly•2017

  • Partisan Bias in Bipartisan Places

    Open Access•Bernard Guay, Brian Guay et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2021

  • The Supreme Court as an electoral issue

    Open Access•Alex Badas, Elizabeth N Simas et al.•Political Science Research and…•2022

  • Partisanship and Perceptions of Party-Line Voting in Congress

    Open Access•Logan Dancey, Geoffrey Sheagley•Political Research Quarterly•2018

  • Who is Punished? Conditions Affecting Voter Evaluations of Legislators Who Do Not Compromise

    Open Access•Nichole M Bauer, Laurel Harbridge-Yong et al.•Political Behavior•2017

  • You Can’t Always Get What You Want

    Open Access•Laurel Harbridge-Yong, Celia Paris•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2021

  • Dynamics of Polarizing Rhetoric in Congressional Tweets

    Open Access•Andrew O Ballard, Ryan Detamble et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2023

  • On democratic intelligence and failure

    Open Access•Christian Adam, Steffen Hurka et al.•Governance•2022

  • The Collective “Congress” on the Ballot? A Voter and Aggregate-Level Analysis of Collective Responsibility in Congressional Elections

    C Algara•Congress & the Presidency•2021

  • Stealth Democracy

    Open Access•John R Hibbing, Elizabeth Theiss-Morse et al.•Stealth Democracy•2002

  • Congress and the Politics of Problem Solving

    Open Access•E Scott Adler, John D Wilkerson et al.•Congress and the Politics of…•2013

  • Party Polarization in Congress

    Open Access•Sean M Theriault•Party Polarization in Congress•2008

  • Spiral of Cynicism

    Joseph N Cappella, Joseph Cappella et al.•Spiral of cynicism•1997

  • Political Ideologies and Political Parties in America

    Open Access•Hubert Noël, Hans Noel•Political Ideologies and…•2014

  • How Partisan Media Polarize America

    Matthew Levendusky•How Partisan Media Polarize…•2013

  • The Ambivalent Partisan

    Howard Lavine, Howard G Lavine et al.•The ambivalent partisan•2012

  • Myth of the Independent Voter

    Keith Magleby, Elizabeth Orr et al.•Myth of the Independent Voter•1992

  • The Broken Branch

    Thomas E Mann, Norman J Ornstein•The Broken Branch•2006

  • Students as Experimental Participants

    Open Access•James N Druckman, Cindy D Kam•Cambridge Handbook of Experimental…•2011

  • The framing of politics as strategy and game

    Open Access•Toril Aalberg, Jesper Strömbäck et al.•Journalism•2012

  • Internal and External Validity

    Open Access•Rose Mcdermott•Cambridge Handbook of Experimental…•2011

  • Polarized America

    Adam Bonica, Howard Rosenthal et al.•Polarized America•2016

  • Pivotal Politics

    Keith Krehbiel•Pivotal Politics•1998

  • Congress as Public Enemy

    Open Access•John R Hibbing, Elizabeth Theiss-Morse et al.•Congress As Public Enemy•1995

  • Strategic Disagreement

    John B Gilmour, John Gilmour•Strategic Disagreement•1995

  • Beyond Ideology

    Frances E Lee, Frances Lee•Beyond Ideology•2009

  • Cross-Sample Comparisons and External Validity

    Open Access•Yanna Krupnikov, Adam Seth Levine•Journal of Experimental Political…•2014

  • Is There a Cost to Convenience? An Experimental Comparison of Data Quality in Laboratory and Online Studies

    Open Access•Clifford, Jennifer Jerit•Journal of Experimental Political…•2014

  • Are Outcome Fairness and Outcome Favorability Distinguishable Psychological Constructs? A Meta-Analytic Review

    Open Access•Linda J Skitka, Linda Skitka et al.•Social Justice Research•2003

  • It's Even Worse Than It Looks

    Open Access•Gerald M Pomper•Political Science Quarterly•2013

  • Variability in Citizens’ Reactions to Different Types of Negative Campaigns

    Open Access•Kim Fridkin, Kim L Fridkin et al.•American Journal of Political…•2011

  • Doing News Framing Analysis II

    Paul D’angelo, Paul D'Angelo•Doing News Framing Analysis II•2018

  • The spirit of compromise

    Amy Gutmann•The spirit of compromise•2012

  • The Shared Fortunes of Congress and Congressmen

    Richard Born, Richard T Born•The Journal of Politics•1990

  • The Policy Origins of Congressional Approval

    Mark D Ramirez•The Journal of Politics•2013

  • Do Something” Politics and Double-Peaked Policy Preferences

    Philip J Egan, Patrick J Egan•The Journal of Politics•2014

  • Reconsidering Moral Issues in Politics

    Timothy J Ryan•The Journal of Politics•2014

  • Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Issue Framing Effects

    Rune Slothuus, Claes H De Vreese•The Journal of Politics•2010

  • Understanding the Party Brand

    Daniel M Butler, Eleanor Neff Powell•The Journal of Politics•2014

  • Self-Fulfilling Misperceptions of Public Polarization

    Douglas J Ahler•The Journal of Politics•2014

  • Orientations toward Conflict and the Conditional Effects of Political Disagreement

    Paul F Testa, Paul Testa et al.•The Journal of Politics•2014

  • Targeted Campaign Appeals and the Value of Ambiguity

    E Hersh, Eitan D Hersh et al.•The Journal of Politics•2013

  • Why Do People Accept Public Policies They Oppose? Testing Legitimacy Theory with a Survey-Based Experiment

    Open Access•James L Gibson, Gregory A Caldeira et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2005

  • Party Polarization and Legislative Gridlock

    David R Jones•Political Research Quarterly•2001

  • Understanding Party Identification

    Open Access•Steven Greene•Political Psychology•1999

  • Game-Framing the Issues

    Regina G Lawrence•Political Communication•2000

  • Procedural Justice Theory and Evaluations of the Lawmaking Process

    Open Access•Amy Gangl•Political Behavior•2003

  • Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research

    Open Access•Adam J Berinsky, Gregory A Huber et al.•Political Analysis•2012

  • How Policy and Procedure Shape Citizens' Evaluations of Senators

    Open Access•David Doherty•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2015

  • Public Preferences for Bipartisanship in the Policymaking Process

    Open Access•Laurel Harbridge, N Malhotra et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2014

  • Do Major Policy Enactments Affect Public Evaluations of Congress? The Case of Health Care Reform

    Open Access•David R Jones•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2013

  • Preference Change in Competitive Political Environments

    James N Druckman, Arthur Lupia•Annual Review of Political Science•2016

  • Opinion Backlash and Public Attitudes

    Open Access•Benjamin G Bishin, Thomas J Hayes et al.•American Journal of Political…•2016

  • Cognitive Biases and the Strength of Political Arguments

    Open Access•Kevin Arceneaux•American Journal of Political…•2012

  • Strategic Party Government

    Open Access•Matthew J Lebo, Adam Mcglynn et al.•American Journal of Political…•2007

  • Explaining Explanations

    Open Access•Christian R Grose, N Malhotra et al.•American Journal of Political…•2015

  • Partisan Polarization and Congressional Accountability in House Elections

    Open Access•David R Jones•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs

    Open Access•Charles S Taber, Milton Lodge•American Journal of Political…•2006

  • Chief Justice Roberts's Health Care Decision Disrobed

    Open Access•D P Christenson, David M Glick•American Journal of Political…•2015

  • Electoral Incentives and Partisan Conflict in Congress

    Open Access•Laurel Harbridge, N Malhotra•American Journal of Political…•2011

  • Attacks without Consequence? Candidates, Parties, Groups, and the Changing Face of Negative Advertising

    Open Access•Conor M Dowling, Amber Wichowsky•American Journal of Political…•2015

  • Separating the Shirkers from the Workers? Making Sure Respondents Pay Attention on Self‐Administered Surveys

    Open Access•Adam J Berinsky, Michele F Margolis et al.•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • Explaining Congressional Approval

    Robert H Durr, Robert Dürr et al.•American Journal of Political…•1997

  • Partisanship, Political Control, and Economic Assessments

    Open Access•Alan S Gerber, Gregory A Huber•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • The Electoral Costs of Party Loyalty in Congress

    Open Access•Jamie L Carson, Gregory Koger et al.•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • Beyond Negativity

    Open Access•Deborah Jordan Brooks, John G Geer•American Journal of Political…•2007

  • The Dynamics of Partisan Conflict on Congressional Approval

    Open Access•Mark D Ramirez•American Journal of Political…•2009

  • Perceived Motives in the Political Arena

    Open Access•David Doherty•American Politics Research•2015

  • Social Identity Theory and Party Identification

    Open Access•Steven Greene•Social Science Quarterly•2004

  • Affect, Not Ideology

    Sharad Iyengar, Shanto Iyengar et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2012

  • The House Committee on Ways and Means

    Open Access•John F Manley•American Political Science Review•1965

  • Governing amid Diversity

    Open Access•T R Tyler•Law & Society Review•1994

  • Unpacking the Black Box of Causality

    Open Access•Katsushi Imai, Kosuke Imai et al.•American Political Science Review•2011

  • The New Videomalaise

    Open Access•Diana C Mutz, Byron Reeves•American Political Science Review•2005

  • Public Opinion and the Democratic Peace

    Open Access•Michael Tomz, Michael R Tomz et al.•American Political Science Review•2013

  • Out of Step, Out of Office

    Open Access•Brandice Canes-Wrone, D Brady et al.•American Political Science Review•2002

  • How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation

    Open Access•James N Druckman, Erik Peterson et al.•American Political Science Review•2013

Unique citing works16
Citations per year1,78
Citation span2017 - 2026 (10)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 16

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae