Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

How Policy and Procedure Shape Citizens' Evaluations of Senators

Bibliographic Data

ID6301431
AuthorsDavid Doherty (0000-0001-9084-7982, Loyola University Chicago, corresponding author)
Year2015
Volume40
Issue2
Pages241-272
Publication date2015-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLegislative Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0362-9805 • E-ISSN: 1939-9162
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/lsq.12074
OpenAlexW1604870853
LanguageEN
Citations received23
References cited60

I report findings from survey experiments that improve our understanding of how people want individual Senators to approach their role as representatives. The findings show that people are committed to the idea that Senators should prioritize their states' preferences over those of the national public. This preference persists in situations where a Senator's advocacy for her state plays a key role in defeating nationally supported legislation. This finding contradicts popular claims that voters are hungry for Senators who prioritize national preferences over those of their constituents. I also find that people who support a piece of legislation—but not those who oppose it—evaluate a Senator who helps to defeat the legislation by filibustering substantially less favorably than one who accomplishes the same ends through majoritarian means. This suggests that how people respond to some procedural characteristics of politicians' behavior depends on how they feel about the outcomes it yields

Economics · Law and economics · Legislation · Microeconomics · Political science · Preference · Public relations · Sociology · State (computer science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Public Administration

  • Voter Preferences for Legislators' Effort Allocation

    Open Access•Nick C N Lin, Ellen Ying‐Shiou Kao•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2026

  • The Political Determinants of Public Support for Obstruction of Supreme Court Nominees

    Open Access•Andrew Stones•Journal of Law and Courts•2024

  • Media Coverage of the Senate Filibuster and Its Effects on Public Opinion

    Open Access•Scott R Meinke•Political Research Quarterly•2024

  • Ends versus means? Ideology and support for repeals in the mass public

    Open Access•Nathaniel A Birkhead, Jordan Ragusa et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2024

  • Attitudes Toward Delegation to Presidential Commissions

    Open Access•David Ryan Miller, Andrew Reeve et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2017

  • Representation Imperatives in the Public Mind

    Open Access•David Doherty, Amanda Clare Bryan et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2019

  • Senate Representation on Twitter

    Open Access•Annelise Russell•Social Science Quarterly•2021

  • The Member-Level Determinants and Consequences of Party Legislative Obstruction in the U.S. Senate

    Open Access•C Algara, Joseph Zamadics et al.•American Politics Research•2019

  • Unilateral Powers, Public Opinion, and the Presidency

    Andrew Reeve, Andrew Reeves et al.•The Journal of Politics•2016

  • Does Procedural Fairness Influence Evaluations of Government Efforts to Combat Gender-Based Violence? Evidence from Brazil

    Open Access•Helen Rabello Kras•Politics & Gender•2024

  • Public Support for State Challenges to National Laws

    Open Access•Jennifer Wolak•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • Rethinking Representation from a Communal Perspective

    Open Access•Mia Costa, Kaylee T Johnson et al.•Political Behavior•2018

  • Who is Punished? Conditions Affecting Voter Evaluations of Legislators Who Do Not Compromise

    Open Access•Nichole M Bauer, Laurel Harbridge-Yong et al.•Political Behavior•2017

  • You Can’t Always Get What You Want

    Open Access•Laurel Harbridge-Yong, Celia Paris•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2021

  • How Filibuster Rhetoric Informs Perceptions of Politicians

    Open Access•Kevin K Banda, James Sievert et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2024

  • Holding agencies accountable

    Open Access•Susan M Miller, Alexander I Ruder et al.•Journal of Public Policy•2020

  • Ideology, Not Affect

    Open Access•Mia Costa•American Journal of Political…•2021

  • The Public Cost of Unilateral Action

    Open Access•Andrew Reeve, Andrew Reeves et al.•American Journal of Political…•2018

  • How Partisan Conflict in Congress Affects Public Opinion

    Open Access•D J Flynn, Laurel Harbridge•American Politics Research•2016

  • Mass Preferences on Shared Representation and the Composition of Legislative Districts

    Open Access•D P Christenson, Dino Christenson et al.•American Politics Research•2015

  • Humanitarianism, Egalitarianism, and Public Support for Political Compromise

    Open Access•David C Barker, Christopher J Carman et al.•American Politics Research•2023

  • Ask Only What Your Country Can Do for You

    Open Access•D P Christenson, Jennifer Lin et al.•American Politics Research•2021

  • Executive Power in Crisis

    Open Access•Kenneth Lowande, Jon C Rogowski•American Political Science Review•2021

  • Procedural Justice

    John W Thibaut, Laurens Walker•Procedural Justice•1976

  • Stealth Democracy

    Open Access•John R Hibbing, Elizabeth Theiss-Morse et al.•Stealth Democracy•2002

  • The Rationalizing Voter

    Open Access•Milton Lodge, Charles S Taber•Rationalizing Voter•2013

  • The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion

    Open Access•John R Zaller, John Zaller•Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion•1992

  • With Malice toward Some

    Open Access•George E Marcus, John L Sullivan et al.•With Malice Toward Some•1995

  • The Concept of Constituency

    Open Access•Andrew Rehfeld•Concept of Constituency•2005

  • Three Steps toward a Theory of Motivated Political Reasoning

    Open Access•Milton Lodge, Charles Taber et al.•Elements of Reason•2000

  • Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk

    Open Access•Gabriele Paolacci, Joan Chandler et al.•Judgment and Decision Making•2010

  • Amazon's Mechanical Turk

    Open Access•Michael D Buhrmester, Michael Buhrmester et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2011

  • Congress as Public Enemy

    Open Access•John R Hibbing, Elizabeth Theiss-Morse et al.•Congress As Public Enemy•1995

  • What Should Be Done with Equity Theory

    Gerald S Leventhal•Social Exchange•1980

  • The 2006 Cooperative Congressional Election Study

    Lynn Vavreck, Douglas Rivers•Journal of Elections Public…•2008

  • Why Congressional Reforms Fail

    Open Access•J A Jenkins•Political Science Quarterly•2003

  • National Surveys Via Rdd Telephone Interviewing Versus the Internet

    Linchiat Chang, Jon A Krosnick•Public Opinion Quarterly•2009

  • Living Up to Expectations

    David C Kimball, Samuel C Patterson•The Journal of Politics•1997

  • Patterns of Representation

    Open Access•Christopher Wlezien•The Journal of Politics•2004

  • Representation in Congress

    Joshua D Clinton•The Journal of Politics•2006

  • The Pandering Politicians of Suspicious Minds

    Kathleen M Mcgraw, Milton Lodge et al.•The Journal of Politics•2002

  • To Whom Do People Think Representatives Should Respond

    David Doherty•Public Opinion Quarterly•2013

  • Public Opinion and Public Policy, 1980-1993

    Alan D Monroe•Public Opinion Quarterly•1998

  • How Citizens and Their Legislators Prioritize Spheres of Representation

    Open Access•John D Griffin, P Flavin•Political Research Quarterly•2011

  • When Do the Ends Justify the Means? Evaluating Procedural Fairness

    Open Access•David Doherty, Jennifer Wolak•Political Behavior•2012

  • Procedural Justice Theory and Evaluations of the Lawmaking Process

    Open Access•Amy Gangl•Political Behavior•2003

  • Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research

    Open Access•Adam J Berinsky, Gregory A Huber et al.•Political Analysis•2012

  • The Effect of Survey Mode and Sampling on Inferences about Political Attitudes and Behavior

    Open Access•N Malhotra, Jon A Krosnick•Political Analysis•2007

  • The Job of Representation in Congress

    Open Access•J Tobin Grant, Thomas J Rudolph et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2004

  • Perceptions of Electoral Fairness and Voter Turnout

    Open Access•Sarah Birch•Comparative Political Studies•2010

  • Election Proximity and Senatorial Roll Call Voting

    Martin Thomas•American Journal of Political…•1985

  • Representational Role, Constituency Opinion, and Legislative Roll-Call Behavior

    James H Kuklinski, Richard C Elling•American Journal of Political…•1977

  • "What They Say or What They Do?" The Impact of Elite Explanation and Policy Outcomes on Public Opinion

    Kathleen M Mcgraw, Samuel Best et al.•American Journal of Political…•1995

  • Electoral Incentives and Partisan Conflict in Congress

    Open Access•Laurel Harbridge, N Malhotra•American Journal of Political…•2011

  • Appropriators not Position Takers

    Open Access•Justin Grimmer•American Journal of Political…•2013

  • American Ambivalence Towards Abortion Policy

    R Michael Alvarez, John Brehm•American Journal of Political…•1995

  • Value Conflict, Group Affect, and the Issue of Campaign Finance

    Open Access•J Tobin Grant, Thomas J Rudolph et al.•American Journal of Political…•2003

  • The Delegate Theory of Representation

    Donald J Mccrone, James H Kuklinski•American Journal of Political…•1979

  • Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation

    James L Gibson•American Journal of Political…•2002

  • The Public and the Paradox of Leadership

    Lee Sigelman, Carol K Sigelman et al.•American Journal of Political…•1992

  • How People Think, Reason, and Feel about Rights and Liberties

    Dennis Chong•American Journal of Political…•1993

  • The Cognitive and Affective Bases of Political Tolerance Judgments

    James H Kuklinski, Ellen D B Riggle et al.•American Journal of Political…•1991

  • Explaining Congressional Approval

    Robert H Durr, Robert Dürr et al.•American Journal of Political…•1997

  • Electoral Change and Policy Representation in Congress

    Open Access•Walter J Stone•British Journal of Political…•1982

  • Americans’ Attitudes About the Senate Filibuster

    Open Access•Stephanie S Smith, Steven S Smith et al.•American Politics Research•2013

  • Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation

    T R Tyler•Annual Review of Psychology•2005

  • The case for motivated reasoning

    Ziva Kunda•Psychological Bulletin•1990

  • Constituency Influence in Congress

    Open Access•Warren E Miller, Donald E Stokes et al.•American Political Science Review•1963

  • Collective vs. Dyadic Representation in Congress

    Open Access•Robert Weissberg•American Political Science Review•1978

  • Freshman Committee Assignments and Re-election in the United States House of Representatives

    Open Access•Charles S Bullock•American Political Science Review•1972

  • The Role of the Representative

    Open Access•Heinz Eulau, John C Wahlke et al.•American Political Science Review•1959

  • Leapfrog Representation and Extremism

    Open Access•Joseph Bafumi, Michael C Herron•American Political Science Review•2010

  • Who Wants To Deliberate-And Why

    Open Access•Michael A Neblo, Kevin M Esterling et al.•American Political Science Review•2010

  • Dynamic Representation

    Open Access•James A Stimson, James Stimson et al.•American Political Science Review•1995

  • Representation Rethought

    Open Access•Andrew Rehfeld•American Political Science Review•2009

  • The Nature of Political Representation, II

    Open Access•John A Fairlie•American Political Science Review•1940

  • The Nature of Political Representation, I

    Open Access•John A Fairlie•American Political Science Review•1940

  • Effects of Public Opinion on Policy

    Open Access•Benjamin I Page, Robert Y Shapiro•American Political Science Review•1983

Unique citing works23
Citations per year2,09
Citation span2015 - 2026 (12)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 23

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae