Collective versus individual induction
Recognition of truth, rejection of error, and collective information processing
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6201374 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Patrick R Laughlin (corresponding author), Scott W Vanderstoep, Andrea B Hollingshead |
| Year | 1991 |
| Volume | 61 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 50-67 |
| Publication date | 1991-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315 |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1037//0022-3514.61.1.50 |
| OpenAlex | W4246349117 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 29 |
| References cited | 6 |
Four-person groups and 4 independent individuals solved rule induction problems under 4 levels of potential information. Groups performed at the level of the 2nd-best individuals for correct hypotheses (recognition of truth) and at the level of the best individuals for nonplausible hypotheses (rejection of error)
Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Information processing · Perception · Social information processing · Social perception · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Deception detection and forensic psychology · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Multi-Criteria Decision Making · Neuroscience · Psychology · Social Psychology
Sequential Choice in Group Settings
How we know-and sometimes misjudge-what others know
The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors
Proper analysis of the accuracy of group judgments
Collective versus individual induction with single versus multiple hypotheses
Group Behavior and Performance
Group Performance and Decision Making
Motivated Information Processing in Group Judgment and Decision Making
Centrality and Accuracy in Group Quantity Estimations
Maximizing as satisficing
A Dynamic Model of Group Performance
Collaboration during the diagnostic decision‐making process
Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology
The process of inductive inference in groups
An input-process-output analysis of influence and performance in problem-solving groups
Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems
Confirmation as coping with competition
Developing complex group products
Modeling collective choice
Informational intra‐group influence
Can Confirmation Bias Improve Group Learning
Effects of Individual versus Mixed Individual and Group Experience in Rule Induction on Group Member Learning and Group Performance
The anchoring-bias in groups
Productivity is not enough
Accentuation of information processes and biases in group judgments integrating base-rate and case-specific information
Adapting Teacher Interventions to Student Needs During Cooperative Learning
Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems
Righting language
| Unique citing works | 28 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,94 |
| Citation span | 1995 - 2024 (30) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 24 |