Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Effect of valence on relative weighting in impression formation

Bibliographic Data

ID6206505
AuthorsBert H Hodges (0000-0002-3676-9458, corresponding author)
Year1974
Volume30
Issue3
Pages378-381
Publication date1974-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1037/h0036890
OpenAlexW2149182681
LanguageEN
Citations received32
References cited5

This experiment assessed relative weighting of traits in three types of personality descriptions; those with only favorable traits (PP), with favorable and unfavorable traits (PN), and with only unfavorable traits (NN), Predictions that traits in PP descriptions would be weighted equally and that the more negative trait in PN and NN descriptions would receive greater weight were supported by the results. The results were generally consistent with the initial impression averaging model, although a possible difficulty with respect to the relative size of set-size effects for PP and NN descriptions was noted. Stimulus traits in impression formation may vary in polarization or in valence. Polarization refers to distance from the neutral point, while valence refers to evaluative sign, favorable or unfavorable, of the trait. This study explores the effect of valence on relative weighting in impression formation. Three valence combinations are possible: those in which all traits are favorable (PP); those in which some traits are favorable and some unfavorable (PN); and those in which all are unfavorable (NN). PP descriptions have generally shown equal weighting of traits, as well as set-size effects when traits have the same polarization (e.g., Anderson

Advertising · Impression · Impression formation · Impression management · Perception · Social perception · Valence (chemistry) · Weighting · Chemistry · Cognitive and psychological constructs research · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Individual Motivations and Information Source Relevance in Political Decision Making

    Bruce E Pinkleton, Edward R Murrow•Mass Communication & Society•1999

  • The Tri-Mediation Model of persuasion

    Keith S Coulter•International Journal of…•2008

  • Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation

    John J Skowronski, Donal E Carlston•Psychological Bulletin•1989

  • Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events

    Shelley E Taylor•Psychological Bulletin•1991

  • Social judgment and social memory

    John J Skowronski, Donal E Carlston•Journal of Personality and Social…•1987

  • The puzzle of negative self-views

    Bertram F Malle, Leonard M Horowitz•Journal of Personality and Social…•1995

  • The Effects of Negative Comparative Political Advertising on Candidate Evaluations and Advertising Evaluations

    Bruce E Pinkleton, Bruce Pinkleton•Journal of Advertising•1997

  • Potential alliance partners' reactions to focal firm misconduct

    Open Access•Lulu Shi, Yi Liu•Technological Forecasting and…•2024

  • A qualitative study on the experiences and strategies used by French professional negotiators to detect deception

    Frieder Lempp, Maïs Testa•International Journal of Conflict…•2022

  • The organizational principles of impression formation

    Open Access•Gabriele Bellucci•Cognition•2023

  • Exploring the Consequences of Negative Political Advertising for Liberal Democracy

    Janine Dermody, Richard Scullion•Journal of Political Marketing•2003

  • Effects of Image–Issue and Positive–Negative Scene Orders in Broadcast News

    Yun Jung Choi, Jong Hyuk Lee•Mass Communication & Society•2007

  • Individual Motivations and Information Source Relevance in Political Decision Making

    Bruce E Pinkleton, Edward R Murrow•Mass Communication & Society•1999

  • Coparent Support and Conflict in African American Single Mother-Headed Families

    Open Access•Deborah J Jones, Rex Forehand et al.•Journal of Family Violence•2005

  • The negativity effect and its implications for initial interaction

    Kathy Kellermann•Communication Monographs•1984

  • Issue-Advocacy versus Candidate Advertising

    Open Access•Michael Pfau, R L Holbert et al.•Journal of Communication•2002

  • Effects of Print Comparative Political Advertising on Political Decision-Making and Participation

    Open Access•Bruce E Pinkleton•Journal of Communication•1998

  • Attention and weight in person perception

    Susan T Fiske•Journal of Personality and Social…•1980

  • Effects of information content and evaluative extremity on positivity and negativity biases

    Bogdan Wojciszke, Hanna Brycz et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1993

  • Less is more

    Michael I Norton, Jeana H Frost et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2007

  • Avoiding Blame

    Open Access•Kathleen M Mcgraw•British Journal of Political…•1990

  • Bad is Stronger than Good

    Open Access•Roy F Baumeister, Ellen Bratslavsky et al.•Review of General Psychology•2001

  • The effect of the angry emoji position on consumers’ perception of the sender’s anger

    Ruijuan WU, Jiuqi CHEN et al.•Acta Psychologica Sinica•2021

  • Positive-Negative Asymmetry in Evaluations

    Guido Peeters, Janusz Czapinski•European Review of Social…•1990

  • Negativity and descriptive extremity in impression formation

    Open Access•Joop Van Der Pligt, J Richard Eiser•European Journal of Social…•1980

  • A negativity bias in interpersonal evaluation

    Open Access•Teresa M Amabile, Ann H Glazebrook•Journal of Experimental Social…•1982

  • Effects of Equivalence Framing on the Perceived Truth of Political Messages and the Trustworthiness of Politicians

    Thomas Koch, Christina Peters et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2017

  • The Strengthening of Partisan Affect

    Open Access•Sharad Iyengar, Shanto Iyengar et al.•Political Psychology•2018

  • News, Politics, and Negativity

    Stuart Soroka, Stephen Mcadam•Political Communication•2015

  • An Integrative Perspective on Social Justice

    Open Access•Kjell Törnblom, Kjell Y Tornblom et al.•Social Justice Research•1999

  • The Negativity Effect in Interaction It's All in Your Point of View

    Open Access•Kathy Kellermann•Human Communication Research•1989

  • Mode of Accomplishing Positive and Negative Outcomes

    Open Access•Kjell Törnblom, Elva Ahlin•Social Justice Research•1998

  • Averaging versus adding as a stimulus-combination rule in impression formation.

    Norman H Anderson•Journal of Experimental…•1965

  • Personality impression change as a function of the favorableness of first impressions

    Open Access•May E Briscoe, Howard D Woodyard et al.•Journal of Personality•1967

  • Information redundancy, inconsistency, and novelty and their role in impression formation

    Open Access•Robert S Wyer•Journal of Experimental Social…•1970

  • Application of a linear-serial model to a personality-impression task using serial presentation

    Norman H Anderson•Journal of Personality and Social…•1968

  • Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words

    Norman H Anderson•Journal of Personality and Social…•1968

Unique citing works32
Citations per year0,7
Citation span1980 - 2024 (45)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 26

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae