Effects of information content and evaluative extremity on positivity and negativity biases
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6200568 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Bogdan Wojciszke (0000-0002-6328-8043, University of Gdańsk, corresponding author), Hanna Brycz (0000-0001-7003-9793), Peter Borkenau (0000-0002-2815-3215) |
| Year | 1993 |
| Volume | 64 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 327-335 |
| Publication date | 1993-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315 |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1037//0022-3514.64.3.327 |
| OpenAlex | W4254819624 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 42 |
| References cited | 28 |
This article extends models that assume that the integration of mixed (positive and negative) information results in a negativity bias in the morality domain but a positivity bias in the competence domain. Using functional analysis, this study predicted a positivity bias for moderately evaluated information and a negativity bias for extremely evaluated information. Content domain (competence vs. morality) and evaluative extremity produced main effects in a 2 x 2 experiment where 108 Ss were provided with descriptions of negative and positive behaviors of fictitious targets. As expected, the negativity effect in the morality domain was strong for extremely evaluated information but weak or nonexistent for moderately evaluated information. In contrast, the positivity effect in the competence domain was stronger for moderately than for extremely evaluated information. We suggest that positive and negative evaluations serve as approach and avoidance cues in interpersonal perception. The border between good and evil is located within rather than between persons: Usually, the same person shows both positive and negative attributes. An exception may be characters in the trivial literature, but this literature is considered trivial exactly because it is populated with black and white characters. According to the well-known averaging model of information integration (N. H. Anderson, 1981), observers' impressions of a person should be neutral if this person shows the same number of positive and negative attributes, each to the same extent. Numerous studies reveal, however, that even if the relative number of positive and negative attributes is controlled and balanced, negative impressions tend to emerge (e.g., Birnbaum, 1973; Fiske, 1980; Oden & Anderson, 1971; Reeder & Coovert, 1986; Reeder & Spores, 1983; Roskey & Birnbaum, 1974; Van der Pligt & Eiser, 1980; Warr, 1974). This suggests that negative information, even if equal in extremity to positive information, is given more weight in information integration, thus yielding a negativity effect. This effect has been explained in terms of the relative novelty of negative information (Fiske, 1980), its lower ambiguity (Birnbaum, 1972; Wyer, 1973), or its greater discrepancy with the general positivity of the typical or average person (Simpson & Ostrom, 1976). According to Skowronski and Carl
Cognitive psychology · Content (measure theory · Impression formation · Negativity bias · Negativity effect · Perception · Social perception · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Psychology · Psychometric Methodologies and Testing · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology · Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Belief in Equality and Democratic Leadership Behavior in Two Russian Samples
Interdependent sampling and social influence
The Self in Impression Formation
Universal dimensions of social cognition
Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion
Positive and Negative Social Exchanges
Valenced appearance-behavior cues affect the extent of impression memory
Similarity to the self influences memory for social targets
When Do Corporate Good Deeds Become a Burden? The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility Following Negative Events
In the Aftermath of an Ethical Violation
What Are My Friends Really Like? How We Change Our Perceptions of Familiar Others’ Traits and Actions
Multiple Reputations
Potential alliance partners' reactions to focal firm misconduct
One strike and you’re a lout
Genuine CSR motive and organizational attractiveness
The Maximizing Penalty
Stereotype contents, emotions, and public attitudes
Children and Young Peoples’ Views on Well-Being
Everybody is doing it
Warmth and Competence as Universal Dimensions of Social Perception
A Brief History of Theory and Research on Impression Formation
Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others
The psychosemantics of free riding
The Bias map
The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components
How leader gender influences external audience response to organizational failures
On the Dominance of Moral Categories in Impression Formation
Why Most People Disapprove of Me
The True Self
Morality and competence in person- and self-perception
Trait Inferences, Impression Formation, and Person Memory
How do destination negative events trigger tourists’ perceived betrayal and boycott? The moderating role of relationship quality
Everyday dynamics in generalized social and political trust
Impression formation and cooperative behavior
Negativity and potency effects in impression formation
Trust and respect as mediators of the other‐ and self‐profitable trait effects on interpersonal attraction
Atypicality and the two fundamental dimensions
Whispered words and organizational dynamics
The bigger one of the “Big Two”? Preferential processing of communal information
The primacy of communality in humanization
The Effects of Counterfactual Attacks on Social Judgments
Averaging versus adding as a stimulus-combination rule in impression formation.
Relative importance of probabilities and payoffs in risk taking.
The adaptive nature of human categorization.
Person memory and judgment.
A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception.
A Continuum of Impression Formation, from Category-Based to Individuating Processes
The logic of social exchange
Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation
From dispositions to behaviors
Lay inferences of personality traits
The positive‐negative asymmetry
Negativity and descriptive extremity in impression formation
Inference magnitude, range, and elevative direction as factors affecting relative importance of cues in impression formation
Contrast effects in impression formation
Social judgment and social memory
Attention and weight in person perception
Majority Influence on Group Choices Among Bets
When actions speak louder than words
Social stereotypes and judgments of individuals
Negativity effects in impression formation
Value and uncertainty as weighting factors in impression formation
Dimensional asymmetry in attributional inference
Effect of valence on relative weighting in impression formation
Traits as goal-based categories
Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words
The attribution of morality
Traits as ideal-based and goal-derived social categories
Use of categorical and individuating information in making inferences about personality
| Unique citing works | 41 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,27 |
| Citation span | 1993 - 2026 (34) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 39 |