Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Consumer Opinions about Genetically Engineered Salmon and Information Effect on Opinions

A Qualitative Approach

Bibliographic Data

ID6219580
AuthorsWei Qin (0000-0002-9199-966X, Pennsylvania State University, University Park,, corresponding author), Jayne Brown (0000-0002-9489-1654, Pennsylvania State University), J Lynne Brown (Pennsylvania State University, University Park)
Year2006
Volume28
Issue2
Pages243-272
Publication date2006-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScience Communication (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1075-5470 • E-ISSN: 1552-8545
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1075547006294770
OpenAlexW1973523437
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited35

American consumers remain uninformed about genetically engineered (GE) foods, raising the prospect of their rejection based on outrage rather than risk. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is considering introduction of GE salmon into the food supply, an animal application likely to raise consumer concerns. As the first step in designing balanced information to help consumers reach informed opinions about GE salmon, we held eleven focus group discussions to compare the effect of limited (six groups) and detailed (five groups) information on the participants’ formulated consequences of this GE application. The results suggested that an effective communication piece about a specific GE application should contain basic and specific, including process- and product-related, information to help the recipient formulate consequences, and hence, opinions. It should also incorporate multiple viewpoints on certain and uncertain consequences to increase perceptions of source trustworthiness and help consumers reach informed opinions

Business · Food and drug administration · Genetically engineered · Genetically modified food · Genetically modified organism · Outrage · Political science · Trustworthiness · Viewpoints · Animal Genetics and Reproduction · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Computer Science · Genetically Modified Organisms Research · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology · Marketing

  • Public perceptions of agri-food applications of genetic modification – A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Open Access•Lynn J Frewer, Ivo A Van Der Lans et al.•Trends in Food Science & Technology•2013

  • Understanding Public Calls for Labeling of Genetically Modified Foods

    Shauna Nep, Kieran C O''Doherty•Society & Natural Resources•2012

  • Not just about “the science”

    Open Access•Heather Bray, Rachel A Ankeny•New Genetics and Society•2017

  • Communicating Sensitive Scientific Issues

    Open Access•Katie M Abrams, Thais M Zimbres et al.•Science Communication•2015

  • Cultural Characters and Climate Change

    Open Access•Michael D Jones•Social Science Quarterly•2014

  • Factors Influencing People’s Acceptance of Gene Technology

    Open Access•Melanie Connor, Michael Siegrist•Science Communication•2010

  • Communicative Aspects of the Public-Science Relationship Explored

    Open Access•Anne M Dijkstra, Jan M Gutteling•Science Communication•2012

  • Public Perceptions of Everyday Food Hazards

    Open Access•Chris Fife‐schaw, Gene Rowe•Risk Analysis•1996

  • Proposed Model of the Relationship of Risk Information Seeking and Processing to the Development of Preventive Behaviors

    Open Access•Robert J Griffin, Sharon Dunwoody et al.•Environmental Research•1999

  • Facts and Fears

    Open Access•Paul Slovic, Baruch Fischhoff et al.•Societal Risk Assessment•1980

  • Risk Perception and Communication Unplugged

    Open Access•Baruch Fischhoff•Risk Analysis•1995

  • Presenting Uncertainty in Health Risk Assessment

    Open Access•Branden B Johnson, Paul Slovic•Risk Analysis•1995

  • Public perception of scientific uncertainty in relation to food hazards

    Susan Miles, Lynn J Frewer•Journal of Risk Research•2003

  • Lay views on uncertainty in environmental health risk assessment

    Branden B Johnson, Paul Slovic•Journal of Risk Research•1998

  • Ethical concerns and risk perceptions associated with different applications of genetic engineering

    Open Access•Lynn J Frewer, Robert Shepherd et al.•Agriculture and Human Values•1995

  • Objection’ mapping in determining group and individual concerns regarding genetic engineering

    Open Access•Lynn J Frewer, Duncan Hedderley et al.•Agriculture and Human Values•1997

  • The influence of initial attitudes on responses to communication about genetic engineering in food production

    Open Access•Lynn J Frewer, Chaya Howard et al.•Agriculture and Human Values•1998

  • Consumer perceptions of genetically modified and organic foods. What kind of knowledge matters

    Open Access•ULLA-KAISA KOIVISTO HURSTI, Maria K Magnusson•Appetite•2003

  • Role of Sensory and Cognitive Information in the Enhancement of Certainty and Linking for Novel and Familiar Foods

    Open Access•Hely Tuorila, Herbert L Meiselman et al.•Appetite•1994

  • Consumers» Cognitions With Regard to Genetically Modified Foods. Results of a Qualitative Study in Four Countries

    Open Access•Lone Bredahl•Appetite•1999

  • Beyond the knowledge deficit

    Open Access•Janus Hansen, Lotte Holm et al.•Appetite•2003

  • Consumer attitudes towards genetically modified foods

    Open Access•Maria Magnusson, Maria K Magnusson et al.•Appetite•2002

  • Dimensions of novelty

    Open Access•Anna Backstrom, Anna-Maija Pirttilä-Backman et al.•Appetite•2003

  • Trends

    Jarrod Shanahan, Dietram A Scheufele et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2001

  • Misplaced Faith

    Open Access•Susanna Hornig Priest•Science Communication•2001

  • Affect, generalization, and the perception of risk

    E Johnson, Amos Tversky•Journal of Personality and Social…•1983

  • Public Concerns in the United Kingdom about General and Specific Applications of Genetic Engineering

    Open Access•Lynn J Frewer, Chaya Howard et al.•Science Technology & Human Values•1997

  • Context Effects on Judgment under Uncertainty

    Chezy Ofir, J Lynch et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•1984

  • Consequence Analysis

    Open Access•Sarah K Moore, Mark A Mattaini•Behavior and Social Issues•2001

Citations per year0.44
Citation span2010 - 2017 (8)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae