Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Portfolio Allocation as Leadership Strategy

Intraparty Bargaining in Japan

Bibliographic Data

ID6230554
AuthorsYoshikuni Ono (0000-0002-9222-4014, International University of Japan, corresponding author)
Year2012
Volume56
Issue3
Pages553-567
Publication date2012-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0092-5853 • E-ISSN: 1540-5907
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00586.x
OpenAlexW1513455978
LanguageEN
Citations received26
References cited46

How do the dynamics of portfolio allocation work within parties? While much of the existing literature focuses on portfolio allocation among parties in coalition governments, bargaining over cabinet portfolios also takes place within parties because many parties have internal divisions or factions that influence these decisions. By analyzing data on portfolio allocation in the Liberal Democratic Party of Japan from 1960 through 2007, this study demonstrates that, contrary to the proportionality proposition (Gamson's Law), substantial variance exists in allocation outcomes over time because party leaders allocate cabinet portfolios among factions as a means of preventing defections and challenges from their party's members. The resulting portfolio allocation reflects the bargaining dynamics within the party: I find that party leaders surrender more portfolios as they become more vulnerable to challenges posed by internal rivals

Business · Cabinet (room · Democracy · Economics · Microeconomics · Negotiation · Political science · Politics · Portfolio · Portfolio allocation · Proposition · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Finance · Game Theory and Voting Systems · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies

  • Stock markets and economic uncertainty

    Open Access•Avinash Ghalke, Rudra Sensarma et al.•European Journal of Political…•2023

  • The quantitative and qualitative allocation of ministerial portfolios to European radical right parties

    Open Access•Tian Yuan Tan•Frontiers in Political Science•2025

  • The logic of delegation and institutional contexts

    Open Access•Hiroki Kubo•Asian Journal of Comparative…•2018

  • The Liberal Democratic Party

    Open Access•Michio Umeda•Asian Journal of Comparative…•2018

  • Causes, Effects, and Forms of Factionalism in Southeast Asia

    Open Access•P Chambers, Andreas Ufen•Journal of Current Southeast…•2020

  • Rule by the elderly

    Open Access•Daniel Stockemer, Aksel Sundström•French Politics•2021

  • Partisan distribution of ministerial portfolios in Asian-Pacific democracies

    Open Access•Jinhyuk Jang•Party Politics•2023

  • Indirect executive accountability of prime ministers

    Open Access•Akitaka Kamijo•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2026

  • Hidden Majoritarianism and Women’s Career Progression in Proportional Representation Systems

    Open Access•Daniel M Smith, Alessio Cirone et al.•American Political Science Review•2025

  • Examining the appointment of women to ministerial positions across Europe

    Open Access•DEE GODDARD•Party Politics•2021

  • Entering the men's domain? Gender and portfolio allocation in European governments

    Open Access•DEE GODDARD•European Journal of Political…•2019

  • Disentangling the Value of a Ministry

    Johannes Raabe, Eric Linhart•West European Politics•2014

  • Bargaining in legislatures, portfolio allocation, and the electoral costs of governing

    Shane Martins•West European Politics•2018

  • Within‐party Allocation of Committee Seats

    Open Access•Martin Baekgaard•Scandinavian Political Studies•2014

  • Why Change a Winning Team? Explaining Post-Election Cabinet Reshuffles in Four Westminster Democracies

    Open Access•Thomas G Fleming•Political Studies•2023

  • Selecting Ministers in Times of Crisis

    Open Access•Johan Bo Davidsson, Hanna Bäck•Political Studies•2019

  • Analyzing gender gaps in bicameral legislatures

    Open Access•Yoshikuni Ono, Yuko Kasuya et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2025

  • Political Dynasties and the Selection of Cabinet Ministers

    Open Access•Daniel M Smith, Shane Martins et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2017

  • Multiple Principals and Legislative Cohesion

    Open Access•Stephen A Meserve, Stephen Meserve et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2017

  • Personal Attributes of Legislators and Parliamentary Behavior

    Open Access•Yoshikuni Ono•Japanese Journal of Political…•2015

  • The distribution of individual cabinet positions in coalition governments

    Open Access•Alejandro Ecker, Thomas M Meyer et al.•European Journal of Political…•2015

  • Gamson rule not for all

    Open Access•Andrea Ceron•European Journal of Political…•2014

  • Testing the “China Model” of Meritocratic Promotions

    Open Access•Don S Lee, P Schuler•Comparative Political Studies•2020

  • Arguing for a Negligible Effect

    Open Access•Carlisle Rainey•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • Bending the Iron Law

    Open Access•Giovanna M Invernizzi, Carlo Prato•American Journal of Political…•2025

  • Who Answers for the Government? Bureaucrats, Ministers, and Responsible Parties

    Open Access•Max Goplerud, Daniel M Smith•American Journal of Political…•2023

  • Parties and party systems

    Giovanni Sartori•Parties and party systems•1976

  • Why Parties?

    John H Aldrich•Why Parties?•1995

  • Political Parties and Hard Choices

    Open Access•Kaare W Strøm, Kaare Strom et al.•Policy, Office, or Votes?•1999

  • L. S. Shapley and Martin Shubik. “A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System,” American Political Science Review 48 (1954)

    Open Access•Kenneth A Shepsle•American Political Science Review•2006

  • Homogeneity, independence, and power indices

    Open Access•Philip D Straffin•Public Choice•1977

  • Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Models with Beta-Distributed Dependent Variables

    Open Access•Philip Paolino•Political Analysis•2001

  • The missing piece

    Open Access•James N Druckman, Paul Warwick et al.•European Journal of Political…•2005

  • Changing policy views at the local level

    Open Access•Michiel S De Vries•European Journal of Political…•2005

  • Breaking the Parliamentary Chain of Delegation

    Open Access•Octavio Amorim Neto, Kaare W Strøm et al.•British Journal of Political…•2006

  • Aspects of Coalition Payoffs in European Parliamentary Democracies

    Open Access•Eric C Browne, Mark N Franklin•American Political Science Review•1973

  • Theories of Government Formation and the 1996 General Election in Japan

    Open Access•Junko Kato, Michael Laver•Party Politics•1998

  • Implications of the Effective Number of Parties for Cabinet Formation

    Open Access•Rein Taagepera•Party Politics•2002

  • The Lady's Not for Turning’ but What About the Rest? Margaret Thatcher and the Conservative Party 1979–89

    Philip Norton•Parliamentary Affairs•1990

  • As a Matter of Factions

    Open Access•Mathew D Mccubbins, Michael F Thies et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1997

  • The Timing of Cabinet Reshuffles in Five Westminster Parliamentary Systems

    Open Access•Christopher Kam, Indridi Indridason•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2005

  • The portfolio allocation paradox

    Open Access•Paul Warwick, Paul V Warwick et al.•European Journal of Political…•2006

  • Formation rules and minority governments

    Open Access•Torbjörn Bergman•European Journal of Political…•1993

  • Effective” Number of Parties

    Open Access•Markku Laakso, Rein Taagepera•Comparative Political Studies•1979

  • Electoral Rules, Career Ambitions, and Party Structure

    Gary W Cox, Frances Mccall Rosenbluth et al.•American Journal of Political…•2000

  • Allocating Coalition Payoffs by Conventional Norm

    Eric C Browne, John P Frendreis•American Journal of Political…•1980

  • Government Formation in Parliamentary Democracies

    Leonard W Martins, Lanny W Martins et al.•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • Contending Models of Portfolio Allocation and Office Payoffs to Party Factions

    Carol Mershon•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • Keeping Tabs on Partners

    Michael F Thies, Michael Thies•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • A Comparative Approach to Legislative Organization

    David Epstein, David Mark Epstein et al.•American Journal of Political…•1997

  • Voting Weights and Formateur Advantages in the Formation of Coalition Governments

    Open Access•Stephen Ansolabehere, Jane Mcintosh Snyder et al.•American Journal of Political…•2005

  • Portfolio Salience and the Proportionality of Payoffs in Coalition Governments

    Open Access•Paul Warwick, Paul V Warwick et al.•British Journal of Political…•2001

  • Cabinet Reshuffles and Ministerial Drift

    Open Access•Indridi H Indridason, Indridi Indridason et al.•British Journal of Political…•2008

  • Electoral Reform and the Fate of Factions

    Open Access•Gary W Cox, Frances Mccall Rosenbluth et al.•British Journal of Political…•1999

  • Japan's Political Marketplace

    Yakushiji Taizo, J Mark Ramseyer et al.•Journal of Japanese Studies•1994

  • A Theory of Coalition Formation

    William A Gamson•American Sociological Review•1961

  • Replacing Cabinet Ministers

    Open Access•John D Huber, Cecilia Martinez-Gallardo et al.•American Political Science Review•2008

  • Leadership Effects in Parliamentary Elections in Australia and Britain

    Open Access•Clive Bean, Anthony Mughan•American Political Science Review•1989

  • The Vote of Confidence in Parliamentary Democracies

    Open Access•John D Huber•American Political Science Review•1996

  • Bargaining in Legislatures

    Open Access•David P Baron, John Ferejohn et al.•American Political Science Review•1989

  • Factions and Coalitions in One-Party Japan

    Open Access•Michael Leiserson•American Political Science Review•1968

  • Ministerial Selection and Intraparty Organization in the Contemporary British Parliament

    Open Access•Christopher Kam, William T Bianco et al.•American Political Science Review•2010

  • A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System

    Open Access•L S Shapley, Martin Shubik•American Political Science Review•1954

  • Demand Competition and Policy Compromise in Legislative Bargaining

    Open Access•Massimo Morelli•American Political Science Review•1999

  • Contemporary Japanese Budget Politics

    Hiroshi Itoh, Itoh Hiroshi et al.•Pacific Affairs•1978

Unique citing works26
Citations per year2,17
Citation span2014 - 2026 (13)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 26

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae