Retrenchment as a Screening Mechanism
Power Shifts, Strategic Withdrawal, and Credible Signals
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6231504 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Brandon K Yoder (0000-0001-8815-8854, National University of Singapore, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 63 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 130-145 |
| Publication date | 2019-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0092-5853 • E-ISSN: 1540-5907 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/ajps.12395 |
| OpenAlex | W2897277586 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 23 |
| References cited | 40 |
Both advocates and opponents of retrenchment have treated it as an undesirable, last‐ditch strategy for states that have already experienced severe decline. This article presents a formal model that identifies an unrecognized benefit of retrenchment: It can provide declining states with valuable information about rising states' future intentions. By removing constraints over the behavior of rising states in a particular region, a declining state can induce hostile risers to attempt revision of the regional order. This, in turn, makes a riser's cooperative behavior more credible as a signal of benign intentions, allowing the decliner to oppose hostile types while accommodating benign ones. In contrast to the existing focus on retrenchment as a desperate strategy taken from a position of weakness, this article suggests that the informational benefits of retrenchment are greatest when it is undertaken early, from a position of strength
Economics · Focus (optics · Mechanism (biology · Political science · Position (finance · Power (physics · Retrenchment · State (computer science · Computer Science · Culture, Economy, and Development Studies · Finance · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Political Conflict and Governance · Public Administration
Grand Strategies of Declining Powers
The Dynamics of US Retrenchment in the Middle East
Parameters Summer 2024
Behavioral responses to fiscal rules
Military Presence and Risk Mitigation
The Domestic Sources of International Trust
The Peril of Peaking Powers
Do Small Powers Retrench
Conflicts that Leave Something to Chance
Do States Really Sink Costs to Signal Resolve
Reassurance versus coercive bargaining
Power shifts, third-party threats, and credible signals
Trust, cooperation, and the tradeoffs of reciprocity
Mutual uncertainty and credible reassurance
Bad-faith cooperation
Signaling under the Security Dilemma
Provocation, Bargaining, and War
Costly Concealment
From Foes to Friends
Endogenous preferences, credible signaling, and the security dilemma
Offsetting Uncertainty
Untying Hands
Uncertainty, Shifting Power and Credible Signals in US-China Relations
The United States and the origins of the cold war, 1941-1947.
In the Shadow of Power
Producing Security
Rational Theory of International Politics
Rising to the Challenge
War and Change in World Politics
Trust and Mistrust in International Relations
World Out of Balance
Brothers Across the Ocean
Is China a Status Quo Power
Don't Come Home, America
Graceful Decline? The Surprising Success of Great Power Retrenchment
Decline and Retrenchment
Why International Primacy Matters
Military Primacy Doesn't Pay (Nearly As Much As You Think)
The Pivot before the Pivot
A U.S.-China Grand Bargain? The Hard Choice between Military Competition and Accommodation
The Inscrutable Intentions of Great Powers
Unrest Assured
The Great Rapprochement
The Rise of the Anglo-German Antagonism 1860–1914
The Tragedy of Great Power Politics
Taming American Power
Game Theory and the Spiral Model
Declining Power and the Preventive Motivation for War
Hedging for Better Bets
Information, Commitment, and War
Signaling Foreign Policy Interests
Decline and Devolution
This Time It’s Real
Rational Appeasement
Known Unknowns
Trust, Reassurance, and Cooperation
Managing Uncertainty
The United States and the Origins of the Cold War
Uncertainty, Shifting Power, and Appeasement
| Unique citing works | 23 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3,29 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 23 |